TSTP Solution File: KLE067+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KLE067+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:49:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.34s 2.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 10 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
domain(addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0))) != addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vjr08v9w/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
domain(addition(X1,X2)) = addition(domain(X1),domain(X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vjr08v9w/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(multiplication(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vjr08v9w/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-vjr08v9w/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
domain(addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0))) != addition(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0)),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
domain(addition(X1,X2)) = addition(domain(X1),domain(X2)),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
domain(multiplication(X1,domain(X2))) = domain(multiplication(X1,X2)),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
domain(domain(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0))) != domain(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
domain(domain(X1)) = domain(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : KLE067+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 15:08:40 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.34/2.29 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.34/2.29 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.34/2.29 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 7.34/2.29
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof found!
% 7.34/2.29 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.34/2.29 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 7.34/2.29 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 7.34/2.29 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.34/2.29 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 7.34/2.29 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Initial clauses : 19
% 7.34/2.29 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 7.34/2.29 # Processed clauses : 21
% 7.34/2.29 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 7.34/2.29 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 7.34/2.29 # Generated clauses : 75
% 7.34/2.29 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 40
% 7.34/2.29 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Paramodulations : 75
% 7.34/2.29 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 7.34/2.29 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 7.34/2.29 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 7.34/2.29 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 7.34/2.29 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
% 7.34/2.29 # ...number of literals in the above : 37
% 7.34/2.29 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 7.34/2.29 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 7.34/2.29 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 7.34/2.29 # BW rewrite match successes : 12
% 7.34/2.29 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.34/2.29 # Termbank termtop insertions : 819
% 7.34/2.29
% 7.34/2.29 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.34/2.29 # User time : 0.015 s
% 7.34/2.29 # System time : 0.002 s
% 7.34/2.29 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 7.34/2.29 # ...preprocessing : 0.016 s
% 7.34/2.29 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 7.34/2.29 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.34/2.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------