TSTP Solution File: KLE067+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KLE067+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:44:48 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.22s 1.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (;  14   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ leq > multiplication > addition > #nlpp > domain > zero > one > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(domain,type,
    domain: $i > $i ).

tff(multiplication,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(addition,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(one,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( multiplication(one,A) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

tff(f_116,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ( domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain2) ).

tff(f_121,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ( domain(addition(X0,X1)) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain5) ).

tff(f_126,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] : ( domain(addition(domain(X0),domain(X1))) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [A_12] : ( multiplication(one,A_12) = A_12 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_339,plain,
    ! [X0_46,X1_47] : ( domain(multiplication(X0_46,domain(X1_47))) = domain(multiplication(X0_46,X1_47)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_116]) ).

tff(c_365,plain,
    ! [X1_47] : ( domain(multiplication(one,X1_47)) = domain(domain(X1_47)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14,c_339]) ).

tff(c_381,plain,
    ! [X1_47] : ( domain(domain(X1_47)) = domain(X1_47) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_14,c_365]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [X0_27,X1_28] : ( addition(domain(X0_27),domain(X1_28)) = domain(addition(X0_27,X1_28)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_121]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    domain(addition(domain('#skF_1'),domain('#skF_2'))) != addition(domain('#skF_1'),domain('#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    domain(domain(addition('#skF_1','#skF_2'))) != domain(addition('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_36,c_38]) ).

tff(c_386,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_381,c_39]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : KLE067+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:45:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.22/1.82  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.22/1.83  
% 3.22/1.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.22/1.85  
% 3.22/1.85  Inference rules
% 3.22/1.85  ----------------------
% 3.22/1.85  #Ref     : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Sup     : 84
% 3.22/1.85  #Fact    : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Define  : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Split   : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Chain   : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Close   : 0
% 3.22/1.85  
% 3.22/1.85  Ordering : KBO
% 3.22/1.85  
% 3.22/1.85  Simplification rules
% 3.22/1.85  ----------------------
% 3.22/1.85  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Demod        : 39
% 3.22/1.85  #Tautology    : 73
% 3.22/1.85  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.22/1.85  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.22/1.85  
% 3.22/1.85  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.22/1.85  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.22/1.85  
% 3.22/1.85  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.22/1.85  ----------------------
% 3.22/1.85  Preprocessing        : 0.49
% 3.22/1.85  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.22/1.85  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.22/1.85  Main loop            : 0.29
% 3.22/1.85  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.22/1.85  Reduction            : 0.11
% 3.22/1.85  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.22/1.85  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.22/1.85  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.22/1.86  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.22/1.86  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.22/1.86  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.22/1.86  Total                : 0.82
% 3.22/1.86  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.22/1.86  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.22/1.86  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.22/1.86  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------