TSTP Solution File: KLE063+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.78s 1.07s
% Output   : Refutation 0.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : KLE063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 11:23:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.42/1.05  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/1.05  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/1.05  Process 15127 was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/1.05  Thu Jun 16 11:23:57 2022
% 0.42/1.05  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_14947_n003.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/1.05  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_14947_n003.cluster.edu
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/1.05  set(auto2).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/1.05      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/1.05      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/1.05      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/1.05  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/1.05  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/1.05  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/1.05  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/1.05  clear(print_given).
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (18 formulas)
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/1.05  
% 0.42/1.05  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/1.05  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  10 (all A multiplication(A,zero) = zero) # label(right_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  11 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  12 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  13 (all X0 addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) # label(domain1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/1.05  14 (all X0 all X1 domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) # label(domain2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.07  15 (all X0 addition(domain(X0),one) = one) # label(domain3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.07  16 (all X0 all X1 domain(addition(X0,X1)) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1))) # label(domain5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.07  17 -(all X0 all X1 (addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X1),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X0) -> addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(X1))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.78/1.07  18 leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) != B # label(order) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 0.78/1.07  19 -leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) = B # label(order) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  Auto_denials:
% 0.78/1.07    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  % Assigning unary symbol domain kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (8).
% 0.78/1.07  Function symbol KB weights:  zero=1. one=1. c1=1. c2=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. domain=0.
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.78/1.07  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.78/1.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.01) seconds: goals.
% 0.78/1.07  % Length of proof is 30.
% 0.78/1.07  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.78/1.07  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.78/1.07  % Given clauses 40.
% 0.78/1.07  
% 0.78/1.07  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.07  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  14 (all X0 all X1 domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) # label(domain2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  15 (all X0 addition(domain(X0),one) = one) # label(domain3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  16 (all X0 all X1 domain(addition(X0,X1)) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1))) # label(domain5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  17 -(all X0 all X1 (addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X1),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X0) -> addition(domain(X0),domain(X1)) = domain(X1))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.78/1.08  23 multiplication(A,one) = A # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.78/1.08  24 multiplication(one,A) = A # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 0.78/1.08  27 addition(domain(A),one) = one # label(domain3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.78/1.08  28 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.78/1.08  29 domain(multiplication(A,domain(B))) = domain(multiplication(A,B)) # label(domain2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(14)].
% 0.78/1.08  30 domain(addition(A,B)) = addition(domain(A),domain(B)) # label(domain5) # label(axiom).  [clausify(16)].
% 0.78/1.08  36 multiplication(domain(c2),c1) = addition(c1,multiplication(domain(c2),c1)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(17)].
% 0.78/1.08  37 addition(c1,multiplication(domain(c2),c1)) = multiplication(domain(c2),c1).  [copy(36),flip(a)].
% 0.78/1.08  38 multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.78/1.08  39 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)).  [copy(38),flip(a)].
% 0.78/1.08  40 multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.78/1.08  41 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B).  [copy(40),flip(a)].
% 0.78/1.08  42 domain(c2) != addition(domain(c1),domain(c2)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(17)].
% 0.78/1.08  43 addition(domain(c1),domain(c2)) != domain(c2) # answer(goals).  [copy(42),flip(a)].
% 0.78/1.08  46 domain(domain(A)) = domain(A).  [para(24(a,1),29(a,1,1)),rewrite([24(4)])].
% 0.78/1.08  62 addition(A,multiplication(A,domain(B))) = A.  [para(27(a,1),39(a,2,2)),rewrite([23(4),28(3),23(5)])].
% 0.78/1.08  65 addition(A,multiplication(domain(B),A)) = A.  [para(27(a,1),41(a,2,1)),rewrite([24(4),28(3),24(5)])].
% 0.78/1.08  73 multiplication(domain(c2),c1) = c1.  [back_rewrite(37),rewrite([65(6)]),flip(a)].
% 0.78/1.08  87 addition(domain(A),domain(multiplication(A,B))) = domain(A).  [para(62(a,1),30(a,1,1)),rewrite([29(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.78/1.08  139 addition(domain(c1),domain(c2)) = domain(c2).  [para(73(a,1),87(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([46(3),28(5),46(8)])].
% 0.78/1.08  140 $F # answer(goals).  [resolve(139,a,43,a)].
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.78/1.08  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  Given=40. Generated=825. Kept=114. proofs=1.
% 0.78/1.08  Usable=37. Sos=58. Demods=97. Limbo=4, Disabled=34. Hints=0.
% 0.78/1.08  Megabytes=0.16.
% 0.78/1.08  User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.78/1.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.78/1.08  
% 0.78/1.08  Process 15127 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 11:23:57 2022
% 0.78/1.08  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------