TSTP Solution File: KLE057+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KLE057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:49:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.79s 2.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 7 ( 6 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
domain(esk1_0) != zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfhrsmn3/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfhrsmn3/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
domain(zero) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tfhrsmn3/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
domain(esk1_0) != zero,
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = zero,
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
domain(zero) = zero,
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : KLE057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 10:03:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.79/2.37 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 4.79/2.37 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.79/2.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 4.79/2.37
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof found!
% 4.79/2.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.79/2.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 4.79/2.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.79/2.37 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 4.79/2.37 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Initial clauses : 20
% 4.79/2.37 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 4.79/2.37 # Processed clauses : 21
% 4.79/2.37 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # ...subsumed : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 4.79/2.37 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 4.79/2.37 # Generated clauses : 69
% 4.79/2.37 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 39
% 4.79/2.37 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Paramodulations : 69
% 4.79/2.37 # Factorizations : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 4.79/2.37 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 4.79/2.37 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 4.79/2.37 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 4.79/2.37 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 37
% 4.79/2.37 # ...number of literals in the above : 37
% 4.79/2.37 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 4.79/2.37 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 4.79/2.37 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # BW rewrite match attempts : 13
% 4.79/2.37 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 4.79/2.37 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.79/2.37 # Termbank termtop insertions : 770
% 4.79/2.37
% 4.79/2.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.79/2.37 # User time : 0.008 s
% 4.79/2.37 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.79/2.37 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 4.79/2.37 # ...preprocessing : 0.011 s
% 4.79/2.37 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 4.79/2.37 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 4.79/2.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------