TSTP Solution File: KLE057+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : KLE057+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:25:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : KLE057+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 11:28:14 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.22/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.22/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.22/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.22/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  % File     : KLE057+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.22/0.64  % Domain   : Kleene Algebra (Domain Semirings)
% 0.22/0.64  % Problem  : Domain is very strict
% 0.22/0.64  % Version  : [Hoe08] axioms.
% 0.22/0.64  % English  :
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Refs     : [DS08]  Desharnais & Struth (2008), Modal Semirings Revisited
% 0.22/0.64  %          : [Hoe08] Hoefner (2008), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.22/0.64  % Source   : [Hoe08]
% 0.22/0.64  % Names    :
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.22/0.64  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.1.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.1.0, 0.10 v5.0.0, 0.08 v4.1.0, 0.04 v4.0.1, 0.09 v4.0.0
% 0.22/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  16 unt;   0 def)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   20 (  19 equ)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of connectives :    2 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.22/0.64  %                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   1  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.22/0.64  %            Number of variables   :   29 (  29   !;   0   ?)
% 0.22/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  % Comments : %          encoding
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %---Include axioms for domain semiring
% 0.22/0.64  include('Axioms/KLE001+0.ax').
% 0.22/0.64  %---Include axioms for domain
% 0.22/0.64  include('Axioms/KLE001+5.ax').
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  fof(goals,conjecture,
% 0.22/0.64      ! [X0] :
% 0.22/0.64        ( domain(X0) = zero
% 0.22/0.64       <= X0 = zero ) ).
% 0.22/0.64  
% 0.22/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.22/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.64  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.22/0.64  %VarNum:65(SingletonVarNum:30)
% 0.22/0.64  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.22/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.22/0.64  %SharedTerms:8
% 0.22/0.64  %goalClause: 11 28
% 0.22/0.64  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.22/0.64  [11]E(a1,a4)
% 0.22/0.64  [12]E(f2(a4),a4)
% 0.22/0.64  [28]~E(f2(a1),a4)
% 0.22/0.65  [13]E(f5(x131,a4),a4)
% 0.22/0.65  [14]E(f5(a4,x141),a4)
% 0.22/0.65  [15]E(f3(x151,a4),x151)
% 0.22/0.65  [16]E(f5(x161,a6),x161)
% 0.22/0.65  [17]E(f5(a6,x171),x171)
% 0.22/0.65  [18]E(f3(x181,x181),x181)
% 0.22/0.65  [19]E(f3(f2(x191),a6),a6)
% 0.22/0.65  [23]E(f3(x231,f5(f2(x231),x231)),f5(f2(x231),x231))
% 0.22/0.65  [20]E(f3(x201,x202),f3(x202,x201))
% 0.22/0.65  [21]E(f2(f3(x211,x212)),f3(f2(x211),f2(x212)))
% 0.22/0.65  [22]E(f2(f5(x221,f2(x222))),f2(f5(x221,x222)))
% 0.22/0.65  [24]E(f3(f3(x241,x242),x243),f3(x241,f3(x242,x243)))
% 0.22/0.65  [25]E(f5(f5(x251,x252),x253),f5(x251,f5(x252,x253)))
% 0.22/0.65  [26]E(f3(f5(x261,x262),f5(x261,x263)),f5(x261,f3(x262,x263)))
% 0.22/0.65  [27]E(f3(f5(x271,x272),f5(x273,x272)),f5(f3(x271,x273),x272))
% 0.22/0.65  [29]~P1(x291,x292)+E(f3(x291,x292),x292)
% 0.22/0.65  [30]P1(x301,x302)+~E(f3(x301,x302),x302)
% 0.22/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.22/0.65  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.22/0.65  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.22/0.65  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.22/0.65  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.22/0.65  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f5(x51,x53),f5(x52,x53))
% 0.22/0.65  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x63,x61),f5(x63,x62))
% 0.22/0.65  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x71,x73),f3(x72,x73))
% 0.22/0.65  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f3(x83,x81),f3(x83,x82))
% 0.22/0.65  [9]P1(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x91,x93)
% 0.22/0.65  [10]P1(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x101)
% 0.22/0.65  
% 0.22/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.65  cnf(41,plain,
% 0.22/0.65     (E(f2(a1),f2(a4))),
% 0.22/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,28,18,2,30,10,9,3,8,7,6,5,4])).
% 0.22/0.65  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.22/0.65     ($false),
% 0.22/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,28,41,2,3]),
% 0.22/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.65  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------