TSTP Solution File: KLE052+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE052+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 23 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 22 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn 18 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(domain3,axiom,
! [X4] : addition(domain(X4),one) = one,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4] : multiplication(domain(X4),X4) = X4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(domain1,axiom,
! [X4] : addition(X4,multiplication(domain(X4),X4)) = multiplication(domain(X4),X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain1) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5] : addition(domain(X5),one) = one,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4] : multiplication(domain(X4),X4) = X4,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X5] : addition(X5,multiplication(domain(X5),X5)) = multiplication(domain(X5),X5),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
addition(one,domain(X1)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk1_0) != esk1_0,
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X1),X1)) = multiplication(domain(X1),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
addition(X1,multiplication(domain(X2),X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk1_0) != esk1_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
multiplication(domain(X1),X1) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : KLE052+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 13:43:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 23
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.22/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 18
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # Processed clauses : 54
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.22/1.41 # ...subsumed : 10
% 0.22/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 36
% 0.22/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Generated clauses : 444
% 0.22/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 240
% 0.22/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Paramodulations : 444
% 0.22/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 32
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 29
% 0.22/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.22/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 134
% 0.22/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 134
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.22/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.22/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5690
% 0.22/1.41
% 0.22/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41 # User time : 0.018 s
% 0.22/1.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.22/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 3076 pages
% 0.22/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.22/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------