TSTP Solution File: KLE050+4 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KLE050+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s 300.38s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KLE050+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 14:07:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/1.02  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/1.02  Process 1268 was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/1.02  Thu Jun 16 14:07:33 2022
% 0.44/1.02  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_1109_n022.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_1109_n022.cluster.edu
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/1.02  set(auto2).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/1.02      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/1.02      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.02  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/1.02  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/1.02  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/1.02  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/1.02  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (23 formulas)
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/1.02  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  10 (all A multiplication(A,zero) = zero) # label(right_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  11 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  12 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  13 (all A leq(addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))),star(A))) # label(star_unfold_right) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  14 (all A leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)),star(A))) # label(star_unfold_left) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  15 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,B),C),B) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),C),B))) # label(star_induction_left) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  16 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,B),C),A) -> leq(multiplication(C,star(B)),A))) # label(star_induction_right) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  17 (all X0 (test(X0) <-> (exists X1 complement(X1,X0)))) # label(test_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  18 (all X0 all X1 (complement(X1,X0) <-> multiplication(X0,X1) = zero & multiplication(X1,X0) = zero & addition(X0,X1) = one)) # label(test_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  19 (all X0 all X1 (test(X0) -> (c(X0) = X1 <-> complement(X0,X1)))) # label(test_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  20 (all X0 (-test(X0) -> c(X0) = zero)) # label(test_4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  21 (all X0 all X1 (test(X0) & test(X1) -> c(addition(X0,X1)) = multiplication(c(X0),c(X1)))) # label(test_deMorgan1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  22 (all X0 all X1 (test(X0) & test(X1) -> c(multiplication(X0,X1)) = addition(c(X0),c(X1)))) # label(test_deMorgan2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  23 -(all X0 all X1 all X2 all X3 (test(X2) & test(X3) -> leq(multiplication(star(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X2,X0),star(multiplication(X3,X1))),c(X3))),c(X2)),addition(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X2,X0),addition(X2,X3)),star(addition(multiplication(X3,X1),multiplication(c(X3),X0)))),c(addition(X2,X3))),c(X2))) & leq(addition(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X2,X0),addition(X2,X3)),star(addition(multiplication(X3,X1),multiplication(c(X3),X0)))),c(addition(X2,X3))),c(X2)),multiplication(star(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X2,X0),star(multiplication(X3,X1))),c(X3))),c(X2))))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/1.02  24 -test(A) | complement(f1(A),A) # label(test_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(17)].
% 0.44/1.02  25 test(A) | -complement(B,A) # label(test_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(17)].
% 0.44/1.02  26 -complement(A,B) | multiplication(B,A) = zero # label(test_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: multiplication(A,f1(A)) = zero | -test(A).  [resolve(26,a,24,b)].
% 0.44/1.02  27 -complement(A,B) | multiplication(A,B) = zero # label(test_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: multiplication(f1(A),A) = zero | -test(A).  [resolve(27,a,24,b)].
% 0.44/1.02  28 -complement(A,B) | addition(B,A) = one # label(test_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: addition(A,f1(A)) = one | -test(A).  [resolve(28,a,24,b)].
% 0.44/1.02  29 -test(A) | c(A) != B | complement(A,B) # label(test_3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(19)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: -test(A) | c(A) != B | test(B).  [resolve(29,c,25,b)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: -test(A) | c(A) != B | multiplication(B,A) = zero.  [resolve(29,c,26,a)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: -test(A) | c(A) != B | multiplication(A,B) = zero.  [resolve(29,c,27,a)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: -test(A) | c(A) != B | addition(B,A) = one.  [resolve(29,c,28,a)].
% 0.44/1.02  30 -test(A) | c(A) = B | -complement(A,B) # label(test_3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(19)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: -test(f1(A)) | c(f1(A)) = A | -test(A).  [resolve(30,c,24,b)].
% 0.44/1.02  31 complement(A,B) | multiplication(B,A) != zero | multiplication(A,B) != zero | addition(B,A) != one # label(test_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: multiplication(A,B) != zero | multiplication(B,A) != zero | addition(A,B) != one | test(A).  [resolve(31,a,25,b)].
% 0.44/1.02  Derived: multiplication(A,B) != zero | multiplication(B,A) != zero | addition(A,B) != one | -test(B) | c(B) = A.  [resolve(31,a,30,c)].
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/1.02  Function symbol KB weights:  zero=1. one=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. c=1. Cputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------