TSTP Solution File: KLE040+2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : KLE040+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:03:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  31 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  13   ~;   9   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0 sgn;  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',order) ).

fof(star_unfold_left,axiom,
    ! [X1] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(X1),X1)),star(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',star_unfold_left) ).

fof(star_unfold_right,axiom,
    ! [X1] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',star_unfold_right) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] :
      ( leq(multiplication(star(X4),star(X4)),star(X4))
      & leq(star(X4),multiplication(star(X4),star(X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',goals) ).

fof(star_induction_right,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),X1)
     => leq(multiplication(X3,star(X2)),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',star_induction_right) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',left_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29] : addition(X29,addition(X28,X27)) = addition(addition(X29,X28),X27),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X30] : addition(X30,X30) = X30,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] : addition(X25,X26) = addition(X26,X25),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X6,X7)
        | addition(X6,X7) = X7 )
      & ( addition(X6,X7) != X7
        | leq(X6,X7) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X9] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(X9),X9)),star(X9)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[star_unfold_left]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X8] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(X8,star(X8))),star(X8)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[star_unfold_right]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] :
        ( leq(multiplication(star(X4),star(X4)),star(X4))
        & leq(star(X4),multiplication(star(X4),star(X4))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(X13,X14),X15),X13)
      | leq(multiplication(X15,star(X14)),X13) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[star_induction_right])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    leq(addition(one,multiplication(star(X1),X1)),star(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(star(esk1_0),star(esk1_0)),star(esk1_0))
    | ~ leq(star(esk1_0),multiplication(star(esk1_0),star(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( leq(multiplication(X3,star(X2)),X1)
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(X3,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X1)) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    addition(one,addition(star(X1),multiplication(star(X1),X1))) = star(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_13]),c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24] : multiplication(addition(X22,X23),X24) = addition(multiplication(X22,X24),multiplication(X23,X24)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    addition(one,addition(star(X1),multiplication(X1,star(X1)))) = star(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]),c_0_13]),c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X32] : multiplication(one,X32) = X32,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(star(esk1_0),star(esk1_0)),star(esk1_0))
    | ~ leq(star(esk1_0),multiplication(star(esk1_0),star(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( leq(multiplication(X1,star(X2)),X3)
    | addition(X3,addition(multiplication(X3,X2),X1)) != X3 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_13]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    addition(star(X1),multiplication(star(X1),X1)) = star(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_13]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    addition(one,star(X1)) = star(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(star(esk1_0),multiplication(star(esk1_0),star(esk1_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_29]),c_0_20]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(star(X2),X1)) = multiplication(star(X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_27]),c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13  % Problem    : KLE040+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 05:15:29 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bxPorm37ff/E---3.1_24996.p
% 0.20/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # new_bool_1 with pid 25076 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.53  # Search class: FHHSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 25079 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.53  # Search class: FHHSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.53  # Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.20/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.20/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.20/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.20/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 253
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 12
% 0.20/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 129
% 0.20/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 112
% 0.20/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.20/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.20/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 1656
% 0.20/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 978
% 0.20/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 1656
% 0.20/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2150
% 0.20/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 83
% 0.20/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 30
% 0.20/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.20/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.20/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 46
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 739
% 0.20/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1358
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 29
% 0.20/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 443
% 0.20/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 443
% 0.20/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 118
% 0.20/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.20/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 55
% 0.20/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 37
% 0.20/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 18042
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.53  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.20/0.53  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.20/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------