TSTP Solution File: KLE037+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : KLE037+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:04:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn;  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4] : leq(one,star(X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p',goals) ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p',order) ).

fof(star_unfold_right,axiom,
    ! [X1] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p',star_unfold_right) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4] : leq(one,star(X4)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] : addition(X9,addition(X8,X7)) = addition(addition(X9,X8),X7),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X11] : addition(X11,X11) = X11,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X25,X26)
        | addition(X25,X26) = X26 )
      & ( addition(X25,X26) != X26
        | leq(X25,X26) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X27] : leq(addition(one,multiplication(X27,star(X27))),star(X27)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[star_unfold_right]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] : addition(X5,X6) = addition(X6,X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,star(esk1_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    leq(addition(one,multiplication(X1,star(X1))),star(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,star(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    addition(one,addition(star(X1),multiplication(X1,star(X1)))) = star(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    addition(one,star(esk1_0)) != star(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    addition(one,star(X1)) = star(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13  % Problem    : KLE037+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 04:44:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFoJYZnu8X/E---3.1_17410.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 17555 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2U with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with pid 17563 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 18
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 18
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 46
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 112
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 70
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 112
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 103
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 82
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 22
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 18
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 12
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 49
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1738
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.036 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------