TSTP Solution File: KLE035+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE035+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 1.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (   9   ~;   4   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   2 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( test(X7)
        & test(X6)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X5),c(X7)),zero) )
     => leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,addition(X4,X5)),c(X7)),zero) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
        ( ( test(X7)
          & test(X6)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X5),c(X7)),zero) )
       => leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,addition(X4,X5)),c(X7)),zero) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk4_0)
    & test(esk3_0)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk1_0),c(esk4_0)),zero)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)),zero)
    & ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,addition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c(esk4_0)),zero) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
        | addition(X3,X4) = X4 )
      & ( addition(X3,X4) != X4
        | leq(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk1_0),c(esk4_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk4_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,addition(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c(esk4_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk4_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,addition(multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk4_0)),X1)) = multiplication(esk3_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(addition(esk1_0,esk2_0),c(esk4_0))) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(addition(esk1_0,X1),c(esk4_0))) = multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(X1,c(esk4_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_30]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : KLE035+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 10:33:59 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/1.38  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.19/1.38  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.19/1.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.19/1.38  
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof found!
% 0.19/1.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/1.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object total steps             : 35
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object clause steps            : 20
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object conjectures             : 15
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 12
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.19/1.38  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.19/1.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.19/1.38  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.19/1.38  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.19/1.38  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 0.19/1.38  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.19/1.38  # Processed clauses                    : 108
% 0.19/1.38  # ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.19/1.38  # ...subsumed                          : 16
% 0.19/1.38  # ...remaining for further processing  : 79
% 0.19/1.38  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Backward-rewritten                   : 13
% 0.19/1.38  # Generated clauses                    : 641
% 0.19/1.38  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 447
% 0.19/1.38  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Paramodulations                      : 641
% 0.19/1.38  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Current number of processed clauses  : 66
% 0.19/1.38  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 52
% 0.19/1.38  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.19/1.38  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.19/1.38  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.19/1.38  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 329
% 0.19/1.38  # ...number of literals in the above   : 341
% 0.19/1.38  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.19/1.38  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.19/1.38  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.19/1.38  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.19/1.38  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 78
% 0.19/1.38  # BW rewrite match successes           : 31
% 0.19/1.38  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/1.38  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9904
% 0.19/1.38  
% 0.19/1.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/1.38  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.19/1.38  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.19/1.38  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.19/1.38  # Maximum resident set size: 3348 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------