TSTP Solution File: KLE034+2 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : KLE034+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 11:56:49 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 185.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 185.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   67 (  41 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  152 (  76 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  132 (  47   ~;  40   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   93 (   3 sgn  54   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',additive_identity) ).

fof(4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',left_distributivity) ).

fof(6,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',multiplicative_associativity) ).

fof(9,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',left_annihilation) ).

fof(10,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',order) ).

fof(12,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',test_3) ).

fof(13,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',test_2) ).

fof(19,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( test(X7)
        & test(X6)
        & test(X8)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
        & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X7,X5),c(X8)),zero) )
     => leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),X5),c(X8)),zero) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4',goals) ).

fof(20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
        ( ( test(X7)
          & test(X6)
          & test(X8)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
          & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X7,X5),c(X8)),zero) )
       => leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),X5),c(X8)),zero) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[19]) ).

fof(24,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

fof(26,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

fof(28,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

fof(32,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

fof(36,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

fof(38,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(zero,X2) = zero,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

fof(40,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
        | addition(X1,X2) = X2 )
      & ( addition(X1,X2) != X2
        | leq(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

fof(41,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
        | addition(X3,X4) = X4 )
      & ( addition(X3,X4) != X4
        | leq(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[40]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

fof(47,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ~ test(X4)
      | ( ( c(X4) != X5
          | complement(X4,X5) )
        & ( ~ complement(X4,X5)
          | c(X4) = X5 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

fof(48,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ~ test(X6)
      | ( ( c(X6) != X7
          | complement(X6,X7) )
        & ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
          | c(X6) = X7 ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[47]) ).

fof(49,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( c(X6) != X7
        | complement(X6,X7)
        | ~ test(X6) )
      & ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
        | c(X6) = X7
        | ~ test(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

cnf(51,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | ~ test(X1)
    | c(X1) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[49]) ).

fof(52,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X5,X4)
        | ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
          & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
          & addition(X4,X5) = one ) )
      & ( multiplication(X4,X5) != zero
        | multiplication(X5,X4) != zero
        | addition(X4,X5) != one
        | complement(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

fof(53,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ complement(X7,X6)
        | ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
          & multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
          & addition(X6,X7) = one ) )
      & ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
        | multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
        | addition(X6,X7) != one
        | complement(X7,X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[52]) ).

fof(54,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( addition(X6,X7) = one
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
        | multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
        | addition(X6,X7) != one
        | complement(X7,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( addition(X2,X1) = one
    | ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[54]) ).

fof(75,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( test(X7)
      & test(X6)
      & test(X8)
      & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),c(X7)),zero)
      & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X7,X5),c(X8)),zero)
      & ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X6,X4),X5),c(X8)),zero) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

fof(76,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
      ( test(X12)
      & test(X11)
      & test(X13)
      & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X11,X9),c(X12)),zero)
      & leq(multiplication(multiplication(X12,X10),c(X13)),zero)
      & ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(X11,X9),X10),c(X13)),zero) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

fof(77,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk5_0)
    & test(esk4_0)
    & test(esk6_0)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),c(esk5_0)),zero)
    & leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk5_0,esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero)
    & ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[76]) ).

cnf(78,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

cnf(79,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk5_0,esk3_0),c(esk6_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

cnf(80,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication(esk4_0,esk2_0),c(esk5_0)),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

cnf(83,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(121,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[79,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(122,negated_conjecture,
    leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[80,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(123,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))),zero),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[78,37,theory(equality)]),37,theory(equality)]),37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = one
    | c(X2) != X1
    | ~ test(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[56,51,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(235,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))),zero) != zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[123,42,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(238,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))) != zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[235,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(240,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[43,121,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(243,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk5_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[240,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(247,negated_conjecture,
    addition(zero,multiplication(X1,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))) = multiplication(addition(esk5_0,X1),multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,243,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(260,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))),zero) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[43,122,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(264,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0))) = zero,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[260,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(279,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(zero,X1) = multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0)),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[37,264,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(287,negated_conjecture,
    zero = multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk5_0)),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[279,39,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(288,negated_conjecture,
    zero = multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk5_0),X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[287,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(723,plain,
    ( addition(c(X1),X1) = one
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[135,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(730,plain,
    ( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[723,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5653,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(X1,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))) = multiplication(addition(esk5_0,X1),multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[247,97,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5683,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(one,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))) = multiplication(c(esk5_0),multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))
    | ~ test(esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[5653,730,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5717,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)) = multiplication(c(esk5_0),multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))
    | ~ test(esk5_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[5683,25,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5718,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)) = multiplication(c(esk5_0),multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[5717,83,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5719,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)) = multiplication(c(esk5_0),multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[5718,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26561,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk4_0,multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk3_0,c(esk6_0)))) = zero,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[288,5719,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26617,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[26561,238,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26618,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    26617,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE034+2.p
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+1.ax, KLE001+2.ax]
% eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status ResourceOut
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_2 with time limit 80
% -prover status ResourceOut
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+1.ax, KLE001+2.ax]
% eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_3 with time limit 75
% -prover status ResourceOut
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+1.ax, KLE001+2.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpx8kCoS/sel_KLE034+2.p_4 with time limit 54
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem KLE034+2.p solved in phase 3.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE034+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE034+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------