TSTP Solution File: KLE026+2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : KLE026+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.78s 10.99s
% Output   : Refutation 10.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   25 (  12 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    addition(X,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    addition(X,addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    multiplication(X,multiplication(Y,Z)) = multiplication(multiplication(X,Y),Z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    multiplication(one,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    multiplication(addition(X,Y),Z) = addition(multiplication(X,Z),multiplication(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
    test('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2') = multiplication(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV4')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(29,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,24]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    leq(X,addition(X,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,3]) ).

cnf(117,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,29]) ).

cnf(225,plain,
    leq('SKOLEMAAAV3',one),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[33,117,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(234,plain,
    addition(one,'SKOLEMAAAV3') = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,225]) ).

cnf(331,plain,
    X = addition(X,multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,234,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(576,plain,
    leq(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X),X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,331]) ).

cnf(596,plain,
    leq(multiplication(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X),Y),multiplication(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[576,4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2820,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[596,26,theory(equality)]),27]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : KLE026+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 14:23:54 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  "."
% 0.21/0.49  * 
% 0.21/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T14:23:54
% 0.21/0.50  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n012.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T14:23:54
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.21/0.51  ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 10.78/10.99  ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 10.78/10.99  
% 10.78/10.99  #||
% 10.78/10.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.78/10.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 10.78/10.99  ||#
% 10.78/10.99  
% 10.78/10.99  ; Summary of computation:
% 10.78/10.99  ;     25945 formulas have been input or derived (from 333 formulas).
% 10.78/10.99  ;      2820 (11%) were retained.  Of these,
% 10.78/10.99  ;          324 (11%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 10.78/10.99  ;         2496 (89%) are still being kept.
% 10.78/10.99  ; 
% 10.78/10.99  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.006   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (19 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.327   3%   Process new row              (25,227 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.134   1%   Resolution                   (664 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.311   3%   Paramodulation               (332 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (42 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.003   0%   Embedding                    (167 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.098   1%   Condensing                   (3,636 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.150   1%   Forward subsumption          (3,636 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.042   0%   Backward subsumption         (1,155 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.055   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (11,624 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     9.147  87%   Forward simplification       (24,961 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.049   0%   Backward simplification      (2,668 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.051   0%   Ordering                     (25,841 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.006   0%   Ordering ac                  (1,893 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 10.78/10.99  ;     0.111   1%   Other
% 10.78/10.99  ;    10.492        Total
% 10.78/10.99  ;    10.494        Real time
% 10.78/10.99  ; 
% 10.78/10.99  ; Term-hash-array has 5,835 terms in all.
% 10.78/10.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,060 entries (1,060 at peak, 1,155 added, 95 deleted).
% 10.78/10.99  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 4,766 nodes (4,766 at peak, 5,419 added, 653 deleted).
% 10.78/10.99  ;  Retrieved 15,202 possibly forward subsuming rows in 3,636 calls.
% 10.78/10.99  ;  Retrieved 1,847 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,155 calls.
% 10.78/10.99  ; Path-index has 5,303 entries (5,303 at peak, 5,898 added, 595 deleted).
% 10.78/10.99  ; Path-index has 1,469 nodes (1,469 at peak, 1,675 added, 206 deleted).
% 10.78/10.99  ; Trie-index has 5,303 entries (5,303 at peak, 5,898 added, 595 deleted).
% 10.78/10.99  ; Trie-index has 2,863 nodes (2,863 at peak, 3,375 added, 512 deleted).
% 10.78/10.99  ; Retrieved 11,041,315 generalization terms in 169,920 calls.
% 10.78/10.99  ; Retrieved 5,000 instance terms in 1,536 calls.
% 10.78/10.99  ; Retrieved 106,824 unifiable terms in 3,746 calls.
% 10.78/10.99  ; 
% 10.78/10.99  ; The agenda of rows to process has 92 entries:
% 10.78/10.99  ;     8 with value 17              2 with value 21              14 with value 25
% 10.78/10.99  ;     5 with value 18             18 with value 22               5 with value 26
% 10.78/10.99  ;     5 with value 19              7 with value 23               6 with value 27
% 10.78/10.99  ;     5 with value 20             14 with value 24               3 with value 29
% 10.78/10.99  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2184 entries:
% 10.78/10.99  ;    89 with value (4 19)         32 with value (4 38)           2 with value (4 60)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   131 with value (4 20)         21 with value (4 39)           5 with value (4 61)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   119 with value (4 21)         20 with value (4 40)           4 with value (4 62)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   126 with value (4 22)         10 with value (4 41)           8 with value (4 63)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   185 with value (4 23)         18 with value (4 42)           8 with value (4 65)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   166 with value (4 24)         12 with value (4 43)           8 with value (4 67)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   208 with value (4 25)         16 with value (4 44)           8 with value (4 68)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    92 with value (4 26)         12 with value (4 45)          12 with value (4 70)
% 10.78/10.99  ;   145 with value (4 27)          2 with value (4 46)           4 with value (4 73)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    93 with value (4 28)         12 with value (4 47)          10 with value (4 77)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    81 with value (4 29)          8 with value (4 48)           2 with value (4 79)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    57 with value (4 30)          2 with value (4 51)           8 with value (4 84)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    52 with value (4 31)          4 with value (4 52)           4 with value (4 91)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    72 with value (4 32)          8 with value (4 53)           8 with value (4 93)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    64 with value (4 33)          4 with value (4 54)           8 with value (4 97)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    61 with value (4 34)          4 with value (4 55)           8 with value (4 104)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    41 with value (4 35)          8 with value (4 56)           1 with value (4 107)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    55 with value (4 36)         12 with value (4 58)           4 with value (4 111)
% 10.78/10.99  ;    25 with value (4 37)          5 with value (4 59)
% 10.78/10.99  Evaluation took:
% 10.78/10.99    10.495 seconds of real time
% 10.78/10.99    10.294111 seconds of user run time
% 10.78/10.99    0.201095 seconds of system run time
% 10.78/10.99    [Run times include 0.527 seconds GC run time.]
% 10.78/10.99    0 calls to %EVAL
% 10.78/10.99    0 page faults and
% 10.78/10.99    1,227,299,360 bytes consed.
% 10.78/10.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 10.78/10.99  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T14:24:05
% 10.78/10.99  :PROOF-FOUND
% 10.78/10.99  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------