TSTP Solution File: KLE023+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE023+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 5.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 66 ( 43 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 118 ( 76 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 87 ( 35 ~; 32 |; 12 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 107 ( 5 sgn 59 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X6) )
=> ( addition(multiplication(X5,X4),multiplication(X4,X6)) = multiplication(X4,X6)
=> addition(multiplication(X4,c(X6)),multiplication(c(X5),X4)) = multiplication(c(X5),X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(test_1,axiom,
! [X4] :
( test(X4)
<=> ? [X5] : complement(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).
fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_associativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_associativity) ).
fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
fof(right_annihilation,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_annihilation) ).
fof(additive_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_identity) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).
fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X6) )
=> ( addition(multiplication(X5,X4),multiplication(X4,X6)) = multiplication(X4,X6)
=> addition(multiplication(X4,c(X6)),multiplication(c(X5),X4)) = multiplication(c(X5),X4) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( addition(X6,X7) = one
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X6,X6,X8] :
( ( ~ test(X6)
| complement(esk1_1(X6),X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X8,X6)
| test(X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).
fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( test(esk3_0)
& test(esk4_0)
& addition(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),multiplication(esk2_0,esk4_0)) = multiplication(esk2_0,esk4_0)
& addition(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) != multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_associativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( addition(X2,X1) = one
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( complement(esk1_1(X1),X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk3_0,esk2_0),multiplication(esk2_0,esk4_0)) = multiplication(esk2_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( multiplication(X2,X1) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_27,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,zero) = zero,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_annihilation]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,zero) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X6,X7,X7] :
( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7)
| ~ test(X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7
| ~ test(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( addition(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,X1)),multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk4_0,X1))) = multiplication(esk2_0,multiplication(esk4_0,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( multiplication(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
multiplication(X1,zero) = zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
addition(X1,zero) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
test(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( c(X1) = X2
| ~ test(X1)
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| addition(X2,X1) != one
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(esk1_1(X1),X2)) = X2
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0))) = zero,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_37]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
addition(zero,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
test(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( c(X1) = X2
| addition(X2,X1) != one
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( multiplication(esk1_1(X1),X1) = zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_52,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : addition(X6,addition(X5,X4)) = addition(addition(X6,X5),X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).
fof(c_0_53,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,esk1_1(X2))) = X1
| ~ test(X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_33]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_1(esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0))) = multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),c_0_49])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( esk1_1(X1) = c(X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_40]),c_0_36]),c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( addition(multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)),multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,esk1_1(X3)))) = multiplication(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(c(esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0))) = multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_49])]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,esk4_0))) = multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_39])]),c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) = multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk4_0)),multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0)) != multiplication(c(esk3_0),esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_56]),c_0_39])]),c_0_64]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KLE023+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 07:03:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/5.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/5.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/5.44
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/5.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/5.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object total steps : 66
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object clause steps : 37
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object formula steps : 29
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 20
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 14
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 17
% 0.25/5.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 24
% 0.25/5.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/5.44 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.25/5.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # Initial clauses : 28
% 0.25/5.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28
% 0.25/5.44 # Processed clauses : 7413
% 0.25/5.44 # ...of these trivial : 369
% 0.25/5.44 # ...subsumed : 4777
% 0.25/5.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 2267
% 0.25/5.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 26
% 0.25/5.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 140891
% 0.25/5.44 # Backward-subsumed : 616
% 0.25/5.44 # Backward-rewritten : 122
% 0.25/5.44 # Generated clauses : 296896
% 0.25/5.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 278334
% 0.25/5.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3835
% 0.25/5.44 # Paramodulations : 296832
% 0.25/5.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # Equation resolutions : 57
% 0.25/5.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 1526
% 0.25/5.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 94
% 0.25/5.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 13
% 0.25/5.44 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.25/5.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 1410
% 0.25/5.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96622
% 0.25/5.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 353743
% 0.25/5.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 738
% 0.25/5.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 897164
% 0.25/5.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 249295
% 0.25/5.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7630
% 0.25/5.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4670
% 0.25/5.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 681
% 0.25/5.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 166
% 0.25/5.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/5.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6309375
% 0.25/5.44
% 0.25/5.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/5.44 # User time : 4.362 s
% 0.25/5.44 # System time : 0.115 s
% 0.25/5.44 # Total time : 4.477 s
% 0.25/5.44 # Maximum resident set size: 139920 pages
% 0.25/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.41 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.41
% 0.25/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------