TSTP Solution File: KLE022+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE022+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 129 ( 64 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 134 ( 62 ~; 54 |; 11 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 95 ( 7 sgn 45 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X5)
=> ( leq(X4,addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))))
& leq(addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))),X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(order,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( leq(X1,X2)
<=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).
fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(test_1,axiom,
! [X4] :
( test(X4)
<=> ? [X5] : complement(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5] :
( test(X5)
=> ( leq(X4,addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))))
& leq(addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,c(X5))),X4) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( test(esk3_0)
& ( ~ leq(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))))
| ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))),esk2_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
| addition(X3,X4) = X4 )
& ( addition(X3,X4) != X4
| leq(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : addition(X6,addition(X5,X4)) = addition(addition(X6,X5),X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X6,X6,X8] :
( ( ~ test(X6)
| complement(esk1_1(X6),X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X8,X6)
| test(X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( addition(X6,X7) = one
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0))),esk2_0)
| ~ leq(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X6,X7,X7] :
( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7)
| ~ test(X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7
| ~ test(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( test(X1)
| ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| addition(X2,X1) != one
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( complement(esk1_1(X1),X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( multiplication(X2,X1) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( addition(X2,X1) = one
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) != esk2_0
| ~ leq(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X1)
| c(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( c(X1) = X2
| ~ test(X1)
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( test(X1)
| addition(X1,X2) != one
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( multiplication(esk1_1(X1),X1) = zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( multiplication(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( addition(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( addition(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) != addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))
| addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),addition(esk2_0,multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) != esk2_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(X2,addition(X1,X3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = one
| c(X2) != X1
| ~ test(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
fof(c_0_42,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( c(X1) = X2
| addition(X2,X1) != one
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( test(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_20]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( addition(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) != addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))
| addition(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(esk2_0,c(esk3_0)))) != esk2_0 ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)) = X1
| c(X3) != X2
| ~ test(X3) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( c(esk1_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_35]),c_0_44]),c_0_34]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( esk1_1(X1) = c(X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_34]),c_0_20]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( c(c(esk3_0)) != esk3_0
| ~ test(c(esk3_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( c(c(X1)) = X1
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
test(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( test(X1)
| c(X2) != X1
| ~ test(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
~ test(c(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( test(c(X1))
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_52])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KLE022+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 13:04:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 57
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 36
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 21
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 16
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 10
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 19
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 20
% 0.24/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.24/1.43 # Processed clauses : 1035
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 100
% 0.24/1.43 # ...subsumed : 510
% 0.24/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 425
% 0.24/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 24
% 0.24/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 37
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 29
% 0.24/1.43 # Generated clauses : 11332
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 9734
% 0.24/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 539
% 0.24/1.43 # Paramodulations : 11293
% 0.24/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 39
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 359
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 326
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7885
% 0.24/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 35636
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 66
% 0.24/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29069
% 0.24/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7713
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 915
% 0.24/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 449
% 0.24/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 71
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 51
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 196546
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43 # User time : 0.199 s
% 0.24/1.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Total time : 0.204 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 11004 pages
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------