TSTP Solution File: KLE022+1 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : KLE022+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:31:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.89s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (  56 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  31   ~;  20   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   0 sgn;  48   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(addition(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',right_distributivity) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( complement(X4,X3)
    <=> ( one = addition(X3,X4)
        & zero = multiplication(X4,X3)
        & zero = multiplication(X3,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_2) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( test(X3)
     => ( c(X3) = X4
      <=> complement(X3,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',test_3) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( test(X4)
     => addition(multiplication(X3,X4),multiplication(X3,c(X4))) = X3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3,X4] :
        ( test(X4)
       => addition(multiplication(X3,X4),multiplication(X3,c(X4))) = X3 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( addition(X0,X1) = one
        & zero = multiplication(X1,X0)
        & zero = multiplication(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( test(X1)
       => addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,c(X1))) = X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( c(X0) = X1
      <=> complement(X0,X1) )
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,c(X1))) != X0
      & test(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( complement(X1,X0)
        | addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & zero = multiplication(X1,X0)
          & zero = multiplication(X0,X1) )
        | ~ complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( complement(X1,X0)
        | addition(X0,X1) != one
        | zero != multiplication(X1,X0)
        | zero != multiplication(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( addition(X0,X1) = one
          & zero = multiplication(X1,X0)
          & zero = multiplication(X0,X1) )
        | ~ complement(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( c(X0) = X1
          | ~ complement(X0,X1) )
        & ( complement(X0,X1)
          | c(X0) != X1 ) )
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,c(X1))) != X0
        & test(X1) )
   => ( sK1 != addition(multiplication(sK1,sK2),multiplication(sK1,c(sK2)))
      & test(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( sK1 != addition(multiplication(sK1,sK2),multiplication(sK1,c(sK2)))
    & test(sK2) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f27,f35]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) = one
      | ~ complement(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X0,X1)
      | c(X0) != X1
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    test(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    sK1 != addition(multiplication(sK1,sK2),multiplication(sK1,c(sK2))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( complement(X0,c(X0))
      | ~ test(X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f54]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    addition(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(X0,X2)) = multiplication(X0,addition(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ( ~ complement(X0,X1)
    | addition(X1,X0) = one ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ( ~ test(X0)
    | complement(X0,c(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    addition(multiplication(sK1,sK2),multiplication(sK1,c(sK2))) != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f58]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    test(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

cnf(c_187,plain,
    multiplication(sK1,addition(c(sK2),sK2)) != sK1,
    inference(ac_demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_56,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_189,plain,
    multiplication(sK1,addition(sK2,c(sK2))) != sK1,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_187,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_675,plain,
    addition(multiplication(sK1,sK2),multiplication(sK1,c(sK2))) != sK1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_189,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_730,plain,
    ( ~ test(X0)
    | addition(c(X0),X0) = one ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_731,plain,
    ( ~ test(X0)
    | addition(X0,c(X0)) = one ),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_730,c_50,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_2584,plain,
    addition(sK2,c(sK2)) = one,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_731]) ).

cnf(c_2609,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X0,sK2),multiplication(X0,c(sK2))) = multiplication(X0,one),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2584,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_2616,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X0,sK2),multiplication(X0,c(sK2))) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2609,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_2620,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_675,c_2616]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : KLE022+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 12:36:26 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.89/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.89/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 0.89/1.18  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 0.89/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.89/1.18  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Parsing...
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 4  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  clauses                                 22
% 0.89/1.18  conjectures                             1
% 0.89/1.18  EPR                                     2
% 0.89/1.18  Horn                                    21
% 0.89/1.18  unary                                   13
% 0.89/1.18  binary                                  7
% 0.89/1.18  lits                                    34
% 0.89/1.18  lits eq                                 20
% 0.89/1.18  fd_pure                                 0
% 0.89/1.18  fd_pseudo                               0
% 0.89/1.18  fd_cond                                 0
% 0.89/1.18  fd_pseudo_cond                          1
% 0.89/1.18  AC symbols                              1
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ 
% 0.89/1.18  Current options:
% 0.89/1.18  ------ 
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.89/1.18  
% 0.89/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------