TSTP Solution File: KLE018+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KLE018+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:49:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.91s 2.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 48 ( 34 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 64 ( 36 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 57 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
leq(multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
addition(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| c(X1) != X2
| ~ test(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_22,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = one
| ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
test(esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
( complement(esk4_1(X1),X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2)) = multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
test(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(esk1_0,addition(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ypsjnjyi/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
leq(multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0) = esk3_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
addition(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk3_0,multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk2_0))) = esk3_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk3_0,addition(multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk2_0)),X1)) = addition(esk3_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| c(X1) != X2
| ~ test(X1) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
addition(esk3_0,addition(X1,multiplication(esk1_0,c(esk2_0)))) = addition(esk3_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = one
| ~ complement(X2,X1) ),
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( complement(X1,c(X1))
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
addition(esk3_0,multiplication(esk1_0,addition(X1,c(esk2_0)))) = addition(esk3_0,multiplication(esk1_0,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
test(esk2_0),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( complement(esk4_1(X1),X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
addition(esk3_0,multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0)) = addition(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57]),c_0_46]),c_0_58])]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( addition(X1,esk4_1(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
addition(esk3_0,addition(multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)) = addition(esk1_0,addition(esk3_0,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_61]),c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2)) = multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( addition(X1,one) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
test(esk1_0),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(esk1_0,addition(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
addition(esk3_0,multiplication(addition(esk1_0,X1),esk2_0)) = addition(esk1_0,addition(esk3_0,multiplication(X1,esk2_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk1_0,one) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk1_0,addition(esk2_0,esk3_0)) != addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_74,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_72]),c_0_72]),c_0_46]),c_0_46]),c_0_73]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : KLE018+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:04:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.91/2.41 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.91/2.41 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.91/2.41 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.91/2.41 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.91/2.41 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.91/2.41 #
% 7.91/2.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.91/2.41 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.91/2.41
% 7.91/2.41 # Proof found!
% 7.91/2.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.91/2.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.91/2.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.91/2.41
% 7.91/2.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.91/2.41 # User time : 0.042 s
% 7.91/2.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 7.91/2.41 # Total time : 0.044 s
% 7.91/2.41 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.91/2.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------