TSTP Solution File: KLE013+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : KLE013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.76s 1.94s
% Output   : Refutation 1.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   46 (  37 unt;   0 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   59 (  37 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    addition(X,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    addition(X,addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    multiplication(X,one) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    multiplication(one,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    multiplication(X,addition(Y,Z)) = addition(multiplication(X,Y),multiplication(X,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    multiplication(addition(X,Y),Z) = addition(multiplication(X,Z),multiplication(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | multiplication(Y,X) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | multiplication(X,Y) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( complement(X,Y)
    | multiplication(Y,X) != zero
    | multiplication(X,Y) != zero
    | addition(X,Y) != one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | c(X) != Y
    | complement(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | c(X) = Y
    | ~ complement(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

cnf(22,negated_conjecture,
    test('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(23,negated_conjecture,
    test('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
    one != addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',addition('SKOLEMAAAV3',multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,22]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,23]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    leq(X,addition(X,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,3]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV3',c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,22,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,25]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,25]) ).

cnf(86,plain,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')) = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,25]) ).

cnf(88,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,26]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,26]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2')) = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,26]) ).

cnf(94,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV3',c('SKOLEMAAAV3')) = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,34]) ).

cnf(119,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')),multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,83,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(121,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,83,theory(equality)]),86,85,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(127,plain,
    c('SKOLEMAAAV3') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,121,22]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[119,127,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(136,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X,c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),addition(multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3'),Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[135]) ).

cnf(140,plain,
    leq('SKOLEMAAAV2',one),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[30,88,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),X),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,88,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,88,theory(equality)]),91,90,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(149,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',one) = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,140]) ).

cnf(154,plain,
    c('SKOLEMAAAV2') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,148,23]) ).

cnf(160,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),X),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[144,154,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(161,plain,
    addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),X),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2',X),Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[160]) ).

cnf(231,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2',X),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,149,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(232,plain,
    addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2',X),addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[231]) ).

cnf(1134,plain,
    addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[232,136,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1272,plain,
    addition(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[136,161,theory(equality)]),1134,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1277,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[24,149,94,1272,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : KLE013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 08:16:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T08:16:11
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T08:16:11
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 1.76/1.94  ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 1.76/1.94  
% 1.76/1.94  #||
% 1.76/1.94  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.76/1.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.76/1.95  ||#
% 1.76/1.95  
% 1.76/1.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.76/1.95  ;      8885 formulas have been input or derived (from 197 formulas).
% 1.76/1.95  ;      1277 (14%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.76/1.95  ;          281 (22%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.76/1.95  ;          996 (78%) are still being kept.
% 1.76/1.95  ; 
% 1.76/1.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.005   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (17 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.134   9%   Process new row              (8,276 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.027   2%   Resolution                   (392 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.099   7%   Paramodulation               (196 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (4 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.001   0%   Embedding                    (119 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.036   2%   Condensing                   (899 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.051   3%   Forward subsumption          (899 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.011   1%   Backward subsumption         (359 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.020   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (2,971 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.990  67%   Forward simplification       (8,120 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.027   2%   Backward simplification      (1,161 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.017   1%   Ordering                     (5,644 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.006   0%   Ordering ac                  (992 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     0.055   4%   Other
% 1.76/1.95  ;     1.480        Total
% 1.76/1.95  ;     1.483        Real time
% 1.76/1.95  ; 
% 1.76/1.95  ; Term-hash-array has 2,572 terms in all.
% 1.76/1.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 313 entries (318 at peak, 359 added, 46 deleted).
% 1.76/1.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,564 nodes (1,652 at peak, 2,005 added, 441 deleted).
% 1.76/1.95  ;  Retrieved 3,628 possibly forward subsuming rows in 899 calls.
% 1.76/1.95  ;  Retrieved 364 possibly backward subsumed rows in 359 calls.
% 1.76/1.95  ; Path-index has 2,088 entries (2,170 at peak, 2,586 added, 498 deleted).
% 1.76/1.95  ; Path-index has 603 nodes (603 at peak, 695 added, 92 deleted).
% 1.76/1.95  ; Trie-index has 2,088 entries (2,170 at peak, 2,586 added, 498 deleted).
% 1.76/1.95  ; Trie-index has 1,224 nodes (1,224 at peak, 1,547 added, 323 deleted).
% 1.76/1.95  ; Retrieved 1,237,672 generalization terms in 46,486 calls.
% 1.76/1.95  ; Retrieved 2,273 instance terms in 819 calls.
% 1.76/1.95  ; Retrieved 37,689 unifiable terms in 2,065 calls.
% 1.76/1.95  ; 
% 1.76/1.95  ; The agenda of rows to process has 183 entries:
% 1.76/1.95  ;    16 with value 22             18 with value 29               5 with value 39
% 1.76/1.95  ;    14 with value 23             14 with value 30               1 with value 40
% 1.76/1.95  ;    17 with value 24              3 with value 32               1 with value 44
% 1.76/1.95  ;    15 with value 25              9 with value 33               1 with value 45
% 1.76/1.95  ;    21 with value 26             10 with value 34               2 with value 56
% 1.76/1.95  ;     6 with value 27              4 with value 35               4 with value 59
% 1.76/1.95  ;    15 with value 28              3 with value 36               4 with value 67
% 1.76/1.95  ; The agenda of rows to give has 829 entries:
% 1.76/1.95  ;     2 with value (4 10)         18 with value (4 29)          12 with value (4 53)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     1 with value (4 12)         20 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 55)
% 1.76/1.95  ;     1 with value (4 15)          4 with value (4 31)           8 with value (4 56)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    43 with value (4 17)         26 with value (4 32)           5 with value (4 59)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    55 with value (4 18)          6 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 61)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    75 with value (4 19)         22 with value (4 34)           4 with value (4 63)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    91 with value (4 20)          2 with value (4 35)           8 with value (4 65)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    59 with value (4 21)         16 with value (4 36)           4 with value (4 67)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    28 with value (4 22)          8 with value (4 37)           4 with value (4 68)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    53 with value (4 23)          5 with value (4 38)           4 with value (4 70)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    56 with value (4 24)         12 with value (4 39)           8 with value (4 77)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    63 with value (4 25)          2 with value (4 41)           2 with value (4 79)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    31 with value (4 26)          4 with value (4 46)           4 with value (4 93)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    23 with value (4 27)          6 with value (4 47)           8 with value (4 97)
% 1.76/1.95  ;    18 with value (4 28)          2 with value (4 51)           1 with value (4 107)
% 1.76/1.95  Evaluation took:
% 1.76/1.95    1.485 seconds of real time
% 1.76/1.95    1.416109 seconds of user run time
% 1.76/1.95    0.067641 seconds of system run time
% 1.76/1.95    [Run times include 0.05 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.76/1.95    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.76/1.95    0 page faults and
% 1.76/1.95    149,678,992 bytes consed.
% 1.76/1.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.76/1.95  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T08:16:13
% 1.76/1.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.76/1.95  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------