TSTP Solution File: KLE013+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.58s 47.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 68 ( 50 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 112 ( 68 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 75 ( 31 ~; 27 |; 11 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 88 ( 4 sgn 47 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X4) )
=> one = addition(addition(X4,X5),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(test_1,axiom,
! [X4] :
( test(X4)
<=> ? [X5] : complement(X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).
fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).
fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(left_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_left_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X4) )
=> one = addition(addition(X4,X5),multiplication(c(X4),c(X5))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X6,X6,X8] :
( ( ~ test(X6)
| complement(esk1_1(X6),X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X8,X6)
| test(X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_1])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( test(esk3_0)
& test(esk2_0)
& one != addition(addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : addition(X6,addition(X5,X4)) = addition(addition(X6,X5),X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( addition(X6,X7) = one
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( complement(esk1_1(X1),X1)
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
test(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
test(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( addition(X2,X1) = one
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
complement(esk1_1(esk3_0),esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| addition(X2,X1) != one
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
complement(esk1_1(esk2_0),esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( multiplication(X1,X2) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( multiplication(X2,X1) = zero
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_30,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk3_0,esk1_1(esk3_0)) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(addition(X4,X5),X6) = addition(multiplication(X4,X6),multiplication(X5,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[left_distributivity]) ).
fof(c_0_35,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(one,X2) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_left_identity]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X6,X7,X7] :
( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7)
| ~ test(X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7
| ~ test(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| addition(X1,X2) != one
| multiplication(X2,X1) != zero
| multiplication(X1,X2) != zero ),
inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk2_0)) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_1(esk2_0),esk2_0) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk2_0)) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
addition(one,esk3_0) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
multiplication(addition(X1,X2),X3) = addition(multiplication(X1,X3),multiplication(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
multiplication(one,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( c(X1) = X2
| ~ test(X1)
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
complement(esk2_0,esk1_1(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_40])]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
addition(X1,multiplication(X1,esk3_0)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk2_0,X1),multiplication(esk1_1(esk2_0),X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_38]),c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
esk1_1(esk2_0) = c(esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk1_1(esk3_0),esk3_0) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(esk3_0,esk1_1(esk3_0)) = zero,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X1)
| c(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
addition(X1,addition(multiplication(X1,esk3_0),X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(esk2_0,X1),multiplication(c(esk2_0),X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
complement(esk3_0,esk1_1(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_32]),c_0_51]),c_0_52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( complement(X1,c(X1))
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk2_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0)) = addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(X1,esk3_0),multiplication(X1,esk1_1(esk3_0))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_32]),c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
esk1_1(esk3_0) = c(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_56]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
complement(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
one != addition(addition(esk2_0,esk3_0),multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk2_0,addition(multiplication(c(esk2_0),esk3_0),X1)) = addition(esk2_0,addition(esk3_0,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_58]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
addition(multiplication(X1,esk3_0),multiplication(X1,c(esk3_0))) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)) = one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_61]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk2_0,addition(esk3_0,multiplication(c(esk2_0),c(esk3_0)))) != one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_65]),c_0_66]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : KLE013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 08:10:34 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.42/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.57/46.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.58/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.58/47.75
% 0.58/47.75 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.58/47.75 # OLD status Res
% 0.58/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.58/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.58/47.75
% 0.58/47.75 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.58/47.75 # OLD status Res
% 0.58/47.75 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.58/47.75 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 0.58/47.75 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.58/47.75
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof found!
% 0.58/47.75 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.58/47.75 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object total steps : 68
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object clause steps : 45
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object formula steps : 23
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object conjectures : 31
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object clause conjectures : 28
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object initial clauses used : 17
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object generating inferences : 25
% 0.58/47.75 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 22
% 0.58/47.75 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.58/47.75 # Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.58/47.75 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Initial clauses : 25
% 0.58/47.75 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.58/47.75 # Processed clauses : 2043
% 0.58/47.75 # ...of these trivial : 784
% 0.58/47.75 # ...subsumed : 626
% 0.58/47.75 # ...remaining for further processing : 633
% 0.58/47.75 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Backward-rewritten : 172
% 0.58/47.75 # Generated clauses : 40120
% 0.58/47.75 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 31083
% 0.58/47.75 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Paramodulations : 40116
% 0.58/47.75 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.58/47.75 # Current number of processed clauses : 461
% 0.58/47.75 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 249
% 0.58/47.75 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 0.58/47.75 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.58/47.75 # Non-unit-clauses : 201
% 0.58/47.75 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20917
% 0.58/47.75 # ...number of literals in the above : 42231
% 0.58/47.75 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Current number of archived clauses : 172
% 0.58/47.75 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10970
% 0.58/47.75 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8501
% 0.58/47.75 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 247
% 0.58/47.75 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 562
% 0.58/47.75 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2593
% 0.58/47.75 # BW rewrite match successes : 227
% 0.58/47.75 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.58/47.75 # Termbank termtop insertions : 745109
% 0.58/47.75
% 0.58/47.75 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/47.75 # User time : 0.417 s
% 0.58/47.75 # System time : 0.022 s
% 0.58/47.75 # Total time : 0.439 s
% 0.58/47.75 # Maximum resident set size: 26576 pages
% 0.58/69.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.58/69.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.58/69.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.58/69.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.58/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.58/69.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/69.54 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------