TSTP Solution File: KLE010+2 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : KLE010+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:26:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.73s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 0.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  33 unt;   0 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   59 (  32 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    addition(X,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    addition(X,addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    multiplication(X,one) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    multiplication(one,X) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    multiplication(X,addition(Y,Z)) = addition(multiplication(X,Y),multiplication(X,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    multiplication(addition(X,Y),Z) = addition(multiplication(X,Z),multiplication(Y,Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( leq(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_1) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | multiplication(Y,X) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | multiplication(X,Y) = zero ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ complement(X,Y)
    | addition(X,Y) = one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( complement(X,Y)
    | multiplication(Y,X) != zero
    | multiplication(X,Y) != zero
    | addition(X,Y) != one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | c(X) != Y
    | complement(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ~ test(X)
    | c(X) = Y
    | ~ complement(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

cnf(22,negated_conjecture,
    test('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(23,negated_conjecture,
    test('SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')))))))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')))))),one) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,22]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,23]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    leq(X,addition(X,Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,3]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV2',c('SKOLEMAAAV2')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,23,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(77,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,25]) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),'SKOLEMAAAV3') = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,25]) ).

cnf(80,plain,
    multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')) = zero,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,25]) ).

cnf(82,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV2') = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,26]) ).

cnf(93,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',c('SKOLEMAAAV2')) = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,35]) ).

cnf(107,plain,
    leq('SKOLEMAAAV3',one),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[30,77,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(111,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),X),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[8,77,theory(equality)]),6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(113,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')),multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,77,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(115,plain,
    complement('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[18,77,theory(equality)]),80,79,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(116,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV3',one) = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,107]) ).

cnf(121,plain,
    c('SKOLEMAAAV3') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,115,22]) ).

cnf(127,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV3'),X),multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV3',X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[111,121,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(129,plain,
    ( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))))
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),'SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(multiplication(c('SKOLEMAAAV2'),c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),'SKOLEMAAAV2'))),one) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[24,127,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,c('SKOLEMAAAV3')),multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[113,121,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    ~ leq(addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),one),one),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[129,30,93,130,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    addition(multiplication('SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),one) != one,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,132]),2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(137,plain,
    leq('SKOLEMAAAV2',one),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[30,82,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',one) = one,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,137]) ).

cnf(147,plain,
    addition('SKOLEMAAAV2',addition(one,X)) = addition(one,X),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[146]) ).

cnf(213,plain,
    X = addition(multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3'),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,116,theory(equality)]),5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(214,plain,
    addition(multiplication(X,'SKOLEMAAAV3'),addition(X,Y)) = addition(X,Y),
    inference('EMBED',[status(thm)],[213]) ).

cnf(417,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[147,214,theory(equality)]),135,146,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem  : KLE010+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 15:13:02 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.50  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  "."
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T15:13:02
% 0.22/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-16T15:13:02
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X ?Y) (|addition| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.22/0.53  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|addition| ?X (|addition| ?Y ?Z)) (|addition| (|addition| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.22/0.53  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|addition| ?X |zero|) ?X).
% 0.22/0.53  ; Recognized associativity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X (|multiplication| ?Y ?Z)) (|multiplication| (|multiplication| ?X ?Y) ?Z)).
% 0.22/0.53  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|multiplication| ?X |one|) ?X).
% 0.22/0.53  ; Recognized left identity assertion (= (|multiplication| |one| ?X) ?X).
% 0.22/0.53  ; Declaring addition to be commutative.
% 0.73/0.89  ; Declaring addition to be associative-commutative.
% 0.73/0.89  
% 0.73/0.89  #||
% 0.73/0.89  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.73/0.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.73/0.90  ||#
% 0.73/0.90  
% 0.73/0.90  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.73/0.90  ;      3034 formulas have been input or derived (from 134 formulas).
% 0.73/0.90  ;       417 (14%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.73/0.90  ;           47 (11%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.73/0.90  ;          370 (89%) are still being kept.
% 0.73/0.90  ; 
% 0.73/0.90  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.005   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.002   1%   Assert                       (17 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.049  13%   Process new row              (2,595 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.018   5%   Resolution                   (266 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.039  10%   Paramodulation               (133 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (4 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.001   0%   Embedding                    (44 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.034   9%   Condensing                   (422 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.017   4%   Forward subsumption          (422 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.003   1%   Backward subsumption         (192 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.010   3%   Clause clause subsumption    (917 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.151  40%   Forward simplification       (2,530 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.005   1%   Backward simplification      (376 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.007   2%   Ordering                     (1,804 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering ac                  (255 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.036   9%   Other
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.379        Total
% 0.73/0.90  ;     0.388        Real time
% 0.73/0.90  ; 
% 0.73/0.90  ; Term-hash-array has 938 terms in all.
% 0.73/0.90  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 180 entries (180 at peak, 192 added, 12 deleted).
% 0.73/0.90  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,048 nodes (1,048 at peak, 1,154 added, 106 deleted).
% 0.73/0.90  ;  Retrieved 1,122 possibly forward subsuming rows in 422 calls.
% 0.73/0.90  ;  Retrieved 114 possibly backward subsumed rows in 192 calls.
% 0.73/0.90  ; Path-index has 856 entries (856 at peak, 954 added, 98 deleted).
% 0.73/0.90  ; Path-index has 487 nodes (487 at peak, 572 added, 85 deleted).
% 0.73/0.90  ; Trie-index has 856 entries (856 at peak, 954 added, 98 deleted).
% 0.73/0.90  ; Trie-index has 682 nodes (682 at peak, 789 added, 107 deleted).
% 0.73/0.90  ; Retrieved 123,519 generalization terms in 14,383 calls.
% 0.73/0.90  ; Retrieved 333 instance terms in 201 calls.
% 0.73/0.90  ; Retrieved 11,620 unifiable terms in 1,292 calls.
% 0.73/0.90  ; 
% 0.73/0.90  ; The agenda of rows to process has 274 entries:
% 0.73/0.90  ;     5 with value 18              9 with value 30               6 with value 41
% 0.73/0.90  ;    18 with value 19              6 with value 31               1 with value 43
% 0.73/0.90  ;    17 with value 20             13 with value 32               2 with value 44
% 0.73/0.90  ;    18 with value 21              6 with value 33               1 with value 45
% 0.73/0.90  ;    16 with value 22              2 with value 34               2 with value 46
% 0.73/0.90  ;    19 with value 23             15 with value 35               1 with value 48
% 0.73/0.90  ;    14 with value 24              1 with value 36               4 with value 49
% 0.73/0.90  ;    17 with value 25              2 with value 37               1 with value 51
% 0.73/0.90  ;    11 with value 26              2 with value 38               4 with value 57
% 0.73/0.90  ;    20 with value 27              4 with value 39               4 with value 66
% 0.73/0.90  ;    19 with value 28              2 with value 40               2 with value 74
% 0.73/0.90  ;    10 with value 29
% 0.73/0.90  ; The agenda of rows to give has 247 entries:
% 0.73/0.90  ;     7 with value (4 15)          8 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 51)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    19 with value (4 16)          5 with value (4 29)           4 with value (4 53)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    26 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 55)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    16 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 32)           2 with value (4 56)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    13 with value (4 19)          4 with value (4 33)           5 with value (4 59)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    16 with value (4 20)          9 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 61)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    11 with value (4 21)         12 with value (4 36)           4 with value (4 63)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     4 with value (4 22)          4 with value (4 37)           2 with value (4 65)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    12 with value (4 23)          4 with value (4 38)           2 with value (4 77)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     6 with value (4 24)          8 with value (4 39)           2 with value (4 79)
% 0.73/0.90  ;    14 with value (4 25)          2 with value (4 41)           2 with value (4 97)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     3 with value (4 26)          4 with value (4 46)           1 with value (4 107)
% 0.73/0.90  ;     4 with value (4 27)
% 0.73/0.90  Evaluation took:
% 0.73/0.90    0.389 seconds of real time
% 0.73/0.90    0.357991 seconds of user run time
% 0.73/0.90    0.03063 seconds of system run time
% 0.73/0.90    [Run times include 0.012 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.73/0.90    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.73/0.90    0 page faults and
% 0.73/0.90    27,556,376 bytes consed.
% 0.73/0.90  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.73/0.90  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-16T15:13:03
% 0.73/0.90  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.73/0.90  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------