TSTP Solution File: KLE007+4 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : KLE007+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  29   ~;  23   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   5 sgn  35   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( test(X5)
        & test(X4) )
     => ( leq(one,addition(multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),X5),multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),c(X5))))
        & leq(addition(multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),X5),multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),c(X5))),one) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(test_2,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( complement(X5,X4)
    <=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
        & multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
        & addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

fof(test_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( test(X4)
     => ( c(X4) = X5
      <=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( ( test(X5)
          & test(X4) )
       => ( leq(one,addition(multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),X5),multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),c(X5))))
          & leq(addition(multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),X5),multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),c(X5))),one) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
      ( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( addition(X6,X7) = one
        | ~ complement(X7,X6) )
      & ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
        | multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
        | addition(X6,X7) != one
        | complement(X7,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X7] :
      ( ( c(X6) != X7
        | complement(X6,X7)
        | ~ test(X6) )
      & ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
        | c(X6) = X7
        | ~ test(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( test(esk3_0)
    & test(esk2_0)
    & ( ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0),multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),c(esk3_0))))
      | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0),multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),c(esk3_0))),one) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( addition(X2,X1) = one
    | ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( complement(X1,X2)
    | ~ test(X1)
    | c(X1) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0),multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),c(esk3_0))),one)
    | ~ leq(one,addition(multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),esk3_0),multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),c(esk3_0)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( addition(X1,X2) = one
    | c(X2) != X1
    | ~ test(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(one,multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0))))
    | ~ leq(multiplication(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),addition(esk3_0,c(esk3_0))),one) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
    | ~ test(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(one,addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)))
    | ~ leq(addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),one) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    test(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X3,X4)
        | addition(X3,X4) = X4 )
      & ( addition(X3,X4) != X4
        | leq(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(X2,X2) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(one,one),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_22]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KLE007+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 13:02:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.029 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 33
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 11
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 27
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 52
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 50
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 152
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 94
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 148
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 48
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 33
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 67
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 145
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 91
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 18
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2716
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.031 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3876 pages
% 0.23/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------