TSTP Solution File: KLE007+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KLE007+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:55:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 33 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 20 ~; 16 |; 10 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 3 sgn 27 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(test_2,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).
fof(test_3,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X4) )
=> one = addition(multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),X5),multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),c(X5))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).
fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X6,X7,X6,X7] :
( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( addition(X6,X7) = one
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_2])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X6,X7,X7] :
( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7)
| ~ test(X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7
| ~ test(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[test_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5] :
( ( test(X5)
& test(X4) )
=> one = addition(multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),X5),multiplication(addition(X4,c(X4)),c(X5))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( addition(X2,X1) = one
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X1)
| c(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( test(esk2_0)
& test(esk1_0)
& one != addition(multiplication(addition(esk1_0,c(esk1_0)),esk2_0),multiplication(addition(esk1_0,c(esk1_0)),c(esk2_0))) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,addition(X5,X6)) = addition(multiplication(X4,X5),multiplication(X4,X6)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( addition(X1,X2) = one
| c(X2) != X1
| ~ test(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
one != addition(multiplication(addition(esk1_0,c(esk1_0)),esk2_0),multiplication(addition(esk1_0,c(esk1_0)),c(esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
test(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(X2,one) = X2,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
test(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
multiplication(addition(esk1_0,c(esk1_0)),addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0))) != one,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
addition(esk1_0,c(esk1_0)) = one,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : KLE007+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 12:18:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses : 25
% 0.24/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 25
% 0.24/1.43 # Processed clauses : 71
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.24/1.43 # ...subsumed : 8
% 0.24/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 58
% 0.24/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Generated clauses : 355
% 0.24/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 254
% 0.24/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 0.24/1.43 # Paramodulations : 353
% 0.24/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 56
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 0.24/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.24/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 208
% 0.24/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 264
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51
% 0.24/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 47
% 0.24/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.24/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.24/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.24/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3774
% 0.24/1.43
% 0.24/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.24/1.43 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.24/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 3084 pages
% 0.27/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------