TSTP Solution File: KLE007+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KLE007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:44:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.68s 2.00s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  13 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  12   ~;   6   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   7   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (;  24   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ leq > complement > test > multiplication > addition > #nlpp > c > zero > one > #skF_1 > #skF_2 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(c,type,
    c: $i > $i ).

tff(multiplication,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(addition,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(complement,type,
    complement: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(test,type,
    test: $i > $o ).

tff(one,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_140,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( test(X1)
          & test(X0) )
       => ( one = addition(multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),X1),multiplication(addition(X0,c(X0)),c(X1))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ( addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

tff(f_126,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( test(X0)
     => ( ( c(X0) = X1 )
      <=> complement(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_3) ).

tff(f_120,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( complement(X1,X0)
    <=> ( ( multiplication(X0,X1) = zero )
        & ( multiplication(X1,X0) = zero )
        & ( addition(X0,X1) = one ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+1.ax',test_2) ).

tff(f_64,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( multiplication(one,A) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_left_identity) ).

tff(f_67,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    test('#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_140]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [B_2,A_1] : ( addition(B_2,A_1) = addition(A_1,B_2) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X0_29] :
      ( complement(X0_29,c(X0_29))
      | ~ test(X0_29) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_126]) ).

tff(c_210,plain,
    ! [X0_46,X1_47] :
      ( ( addition(X0_46,X1_47) = one )
      | ~ complement(X1_47,X0_46) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_120]) ).

tff(c_213,plain,
    ! [X0_29] :
      ( ( addition(c(X0_29),X0_29) = one )
      | ~ test(X0_29) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_210]) ).

tff(c_218,plain,
    ! [X0_29] :
      ( ( addition(X0_29,c(X0_29)) = one )
      | ~ test(X0_29) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_213]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    test('#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_140]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [A_12] : ( multiplication(one,A_12) = A_12 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_64]) ).

tff(c_736,plain,
    ! [X0_73] :
      ( ( addition(X0_73,c(X0_73)) = one )
      | ~ test(X0_73) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_213]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [A_13,B_14,C_15] : ( addition(multiplication(A_13,B_14),multiplication(A_13,C_15)) = multiplication(A_13,addition(B_14,C_15)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_67]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    addition(multiplication(addition('#skF_2',c('#skF_2')),'#skF_3'),multiplication(addition('#skF_2',c('#skF_2')),c('#skF_3'))) != one,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_140]) ).

tff(c_51,plain,
    multiplication(addition('#skF_2',c('#skF_2')),addition('#skF_3',c('#skF_3'))) != one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_16,c_46]) ).

tff(c_753,plain,
    ( ( multiplication(one,addition('#skF_3',c('#skF_3'))) != one )
    | ~ test('#skF_2') ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_736,c_51]) ).

tff(c_777,plain,
    addition('#skF_3',c('#skF_3')) != one,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_48,c_14,c_753]) ).

tff(c_786,plain,
    ~ test('#skF_3'),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_218,c_777]) ).

tff(c_790,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_50,c_786]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14  % Problem  : KLE007+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:20:22 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.68/2.00  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/2.01  
% 3.68/2.01  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.68/2.03  
% 3.68/2.03  Inference rules
% 3.68/2.03  ----------------------
% 3.68/2.04  #Ref     : 0
% 3.68/2.04  #Sup     : 176
% 3.68/2.04  #Fact    : 0
% 3.68/2.04  #Define  : 0
% 3.68/2.04  #Split   : 2
% 3.68/2.04  #Chain   : 0
% 3.68/2.04  #Close   : 0
% 3.68/2.04  
% 3.68/2.04  Ordering : KBO
% 3.68/2.04  
% 3.68/2.04  Simplification rules
% 3.68/2.04  ----------------------
% 3.68/2.04  #Subsume      : 28
% 3.68/2.04  #Demod        : 82
% 3.68/2.04  #Tautology    : 92
% 3.68/2.04  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 3.68/2.04  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.68/2.04  
% 3.68/2.04  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.68/2.04  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.68/2.04  
% 3.68/2.04  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.68/2.04  ----------------------
% 3.68/2.04  Preprocessing        : 0.52
% 3.68/2.04  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.68/2.04  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.68/2.04  Main loop            : 0.44
% 3.68/2.04  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 3.68/2.04  Reduction            : 0.14
% 3.68/2.04  Demodulation         : 0.10
% 3.68/2.04  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.68/2.04  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.68/2.04  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.68/2.04  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.68/2.04  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.68/2.04  Total                : 1.00
% 3.68/2.04  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.68/2.04  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.68/2.04  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.68/2.04  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------