TSTP Solution File: KLE006+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : KLE006+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:27:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
test__dfg(skc1),
file('KLE006+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
~ equal(addition(skc1,c(skc1)),one),
file('KLE006+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
equal(addition(u,v),addition(v,u)),
file('KLE006+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(17,axiom,
( ~ complement(u,v)
| equal(addition(v,u),one) ),
file('KLE006+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(20,axiom,
( ~ test__dfg(u)
| ~ equal(c(u),v)
| complement(u,v) ),
file('KLE006+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(25,plain,
( ~ equal(c(skc1),u)
| complement(skc1,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,20]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,20.0')] ).
cnf(55,plain,
( ~ complement(u,v)
| equal(addition(u,v),one) ),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,11]),
[iquote('0:SpR:17.1,11.0')] ).
cnf(79,plain,
complement(skc1,c(skc1)),
inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[25]),
[iquote('0:EqR:25.0')] ).
cnf(101,plain,
( ~ complement(skc1,c(skc1))
| ~ equal(one,one) ),
inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[55,10]),
[iquote('0:SpL:55.1,10.0')] ).
cnf(102,plain,
~ complement(skc1,c(skc1)),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[101]),
[iquote('0:Obv:101.1')] ).
cnf(103,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[102,79]),
[iquote('0:MRR:102.0,79.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KLE006+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 09:51:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 SPASS derived 76 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 45 clauses.
% 0.20/0.46 SPASS allocated 97654 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.46 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46
% 0.20/0.46 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 11 :
% 0.20/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.46 Formulae used in the proof : goals additive_commutativity test_2 test_3
% 0.20/0.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------