TSTP Solution File: KLE006+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : KLE006+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 11:37:50 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 79 ( 41 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 88 ( 36 ~; 30 |; 17 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(6,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/tmp/tmpa0itsn/sel_KLE006+1.p_1',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(11,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( test(X4)
=> ( c(X4) = X5
<=> complement(X4,X5) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpa0itsn/sel_KLE006+1.p_1',test_3) ).
fof(12,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( complement(X5,X4)
<=> ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpa0itsn/sel_KLE006+1.p_1',test_2) ).
fof(16,conjecture,
! [X4] :
( test(X4)
=> one = addition(X4,c(X4)) ),
file('/tmp/tmpa0itsn/sel_KLE006+1.p_1',goals) ).
fof(17,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4] :
( test(X4)
=> one = addition(X4,c(X4)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[16]) ).
fof(29,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
cnf(30,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
fof(40,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ test(X4)
| ( ( c(X4) != X5
| complement(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ complement(X4,X5)
| c(X4) = X5 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(41,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ~ test(X6)
| ( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7 ) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
fof(42,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( c(X6) != X7
| complement(X6,X7)
| ~ test(X6) )
& ( ~ complement(X6,X7)
| c(X6) = X7
| ~ test(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[41]) ).
cnf(44,plain,
( complement(X1,X2)
| ~ test(X1)
| c(X1) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[42]) ).
fof(45,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ complement(X5,X4)
| ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
& multiplication(X5,X4) = zero
& addition(X4,X5) = one ) )
& ( multiplication(X4,X5) != zero
| multiplication(X5,X4) != zero
| addition(X4,X5) != one
| complement(X5,X4) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(46,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( ~ complement(X7,X6)
| ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
& multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
& addition(X6,X7) = one ) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
fof(47,plain,
! [X6,X7] :
( ( multiplication(X6,X7) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X7,X6) = zero
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( addition(X6,X7) = one
| ~ complement(X7,X6) )
& ( multiplication(X6,X7) != zero
| multiplication(X7,X6) != zero
| addition(X6,X7) != one
| complement(X7,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[46]) ).
cnf(49,plain,
( addition(X2,X1) = one
| ~ complement(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[47]) ).
fof(62,negated_conjecture,
? [X4] :
( test(X4)
& one != addition(X4,c(X4)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
fof(63,negated_conjecture,
? [X5] :
( test(X5)
& one != addition(X5,c(X5)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
fof(64,negated_conjecture,
( test(esk2_0)
& one != addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[63]) ).
cnf(65,negated_conjecture,
one != addition(esk2_0,c(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(66,negated_conjecture,
test(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(78,plain,
( complement(X1,c(X1))
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[44,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(191,plain,
( addition(c(X1),X1) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[49,78,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(194,plain,
( addition(X1,c(X1)) = one
| ~ test(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[191,30,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(202,negated_conjecture,
~ test(esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[65,194,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(204,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[202,66,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(205,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[204,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(206,negated_conjecture,
$false,
205,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE006+1.p
% --creating new selector for [KLE001+0.ax, KLE001+1.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpa0itsn/sel_KLE006+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem KLE006+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE006+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE006+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------