TSTP Solution File: KLE002+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KLE002+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:44:38 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.38s 2.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   8 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   6   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (;  15   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ leq > multiplication > addition > #nlpp > zero > one > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(multiplication,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(addition,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(one,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(zero,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(f_86,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( leq(X0,X1)
       => leq(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(f_79,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( leq(A,B)
    <=> ( addition(A,B) = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).

tff(f_69,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : ( multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',left_distributivity) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    leq('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_226,plain,
    ! [A_32,B_33] :
      ( ( addition(A_32,B_33) = B_33 )
      | ~ leq(A_32,B_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_230,plain,
    addition('#skF_1','#skF_2') = '#skF_2',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_226]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [A_16,C_18,B_17] : ( addition(multiplication(A_16,C_18),multiplication(B_17,C_18)) = multiplication(addition(A_16,B_17),C_18) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_235,plain,
    ! [A_34,B_35] :
      ( leq(A_34,B_35)
      | ( addition(A_34,B_35) != B_35 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_79]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ~ leq(multiplication('#skF_1','#skF_3'),multiplication('#skF_2','#skF_3')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_243,plain,
    addition(multiplication('#skF_1','#skF_3'),multiplication('#skF_2','#skF_3')) != multiplication('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_235,c_28]) ).

tff(c_1842,plain,
    multiplication(addition('#skF_1','#skF_2'),'#skF_3') != multiplication('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_18,c_243]) ).

tff(c_1845,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_230,c_1842]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : KLE002+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 23:38:20 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.38/2.23  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.38/2.23  
% 4.38/2.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.38/2.26  
% 4.38/2.26  Inference rules
% 4.38/2.26  ----------------------
% 4.38/2.26  #Ref     : 0
% 4.38/2.26  #Sup     : 436
% 4.38/2.26  #Fact    : 0
% 4.38/2.26  #Define  : 0
% 4.38/2.26  #Split   : 0
% 4.38/2.26  #Chain   : 0
% 4.38/2.26  #Close   : 0
% 4.38/2.26  
% 4.38/2.26  Ordering : KBO
% 4.38/2.26  
% 4.38/2.26  Simplification rules
% 4.38/2.26  ----------------------
% 4.38/2.26  #Subsume      : 32
% 4.38/2.26  #Demod        : 426
% 4.38/2.26  #Tautology    : 222
% 4.38/2.26  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.38/2.26  #BackRed      : 1
% 4.38/2.26  
% 4.38/2.26  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.38/2.26  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.38/2.26  
% 4.38/2.26  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.38/2.26  ----------------------
% 4.38/2.26  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 4.38/2.26  Parsing              : 0.25
% 4.38/2.27  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.38/2.27  Main loop            : 0.63
% 4.38/2.27  Inferencing          : 0.21
% 4.38/2.27  Reduction            : 0.26
% 4.38/2.27  Demodulation         : 0.22
% 4.38/2.27  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.38/2.27  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.38/2.27  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 4.38/2.27  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.38/2.27  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.38/2.27  Total                : 1.14
% 4.38/2.27  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.38/2.27  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.38/2.27  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.38/2.27  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------