TSTP Solution File: KLE001+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : KLE001+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:25:30 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 6 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 2 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 3 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn; 12 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
zero: $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
one: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( leq(X4,X5)
=> leq(addition(X4,X6),addition(X4,X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
fof(order,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( leq(X1,X2)
<=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',order) ).
fof(additive_idempotence,axiom,
! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_idempotence) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4,X5,X6] :
( leq(X4,X5)
=> leq(addition(X4,X6),addition(X4,X6)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( ( ~ leq(X27,X28)
| addition(X27,X28) = X28 )
& ( addition(X27,X28) != X28
| leq(X27,X28) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X13] : addition(X13,X13) = X13,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_idempotence]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( leq(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& ~ leq(addition(esk1_0,esk3_0),addition(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
addition(X1,X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ leq(addition(esk1_0,esk3_0),addition(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
leq(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : KLE001+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 12:41:08 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.61 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.63 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.63 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.63 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.63 % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------