TSTP Solution File: ITP345_1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ITP001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:35:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.09s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 1.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 'CODE-FOR-$$LESS')

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(25,negated_conjecture,
    ( 'fun_app$d'('finite$','solution_set$'('a$','zero$'))
    | ~ $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'solution_set$'('a$','zero$')))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture6) ).

tff(26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ 'fun_app$d'('finite$','solution_set$'('a$','zero$'))
    | $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'solution_set$'('a$','zero$')))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture6) ).

tff(30,axiom,
    ! [X: 'A_n_vec_rows_vec$'] :
      ( ~ $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'solution_set$'(X,'zero$'))))
      | ~ 'fun_app$d'('finite$','solution_set$'(X,'zero$')) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom10) ).

tff(32,axiom,
    ! [X: 'A_n_vec_rows_vec$'] :
      ( 'fun_app$d'('finite$','solution_set$'(X,'zero$'))
      | $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'solution_set$'(X,'zero$')))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom12) ).

tff(49,axiom,
    ! [X: 'Nat$'] :
      ( ( 'fun_app$j'('of_nat$',X) = 0 )
      | $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$',X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom27) ).

tff(80,axiom,
    ! [X: 'A_n_vec_rows_vec$'] : ( 'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'solution_set$'(X,'zero$'))) = 'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'(X))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom60) ).

tff(116,axiom,
    ! [X: 'A_n_vec_rows_vec$'] : ( 'null_space$a'(X) = 'solution_set$'(X,'zero$') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom90) ).

tff(799,plain,
    ! [X: 'A_n_vec_rows_vec$'] :
      ( ~ $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'(X))))
      | ~ 'fun_app$d'('finite$','null_space$a'(X)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[30,116,80,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(800,plain,
    ! [X: 'A_n_vec_rows_vec$'] :
      ( 'fun_app$d'('finite$','null_space$a'(X))
      | $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'(X)))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[32,116,80,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(801,plain,
    ( 'fun_app$d'('finite$','null_space$a'('a$'))
    | ~ $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'('a$')))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[25,116,80,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(802,plain,
    ( ~ 'fun_app$d'('finite$','null_space$a'('a$'))
    | $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'('a$')))) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[26,116,80,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(2055,plain,
    $less(0,'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'('a$')))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[802,800]) ).

tff(2056,plain,
    'fun_app$d'('finite$','null_space$a'('a$')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[801,2055]) ).

tff(2062,plain,
    'fun_app$j'('of_nat$','fun_app$k'('dim$'('vector_scalar_mult$'),'null_space$a'('a$'))) = 0,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[799,2056,49]) ).

cnf(2063,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[2055,'CODE-FOR-$$LESS',2062,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ITP001_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun  3 20:00:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-03T20:00:10
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-06-03T20:00:10
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |finite$e| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.47/0.66  WARNING:
% 0.47/0.66     |finite$f| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.09/1.32  
% 1.09/1.32  
% 1.09/1.32  #||
% 1.09/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.09/1.32  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.09/1.32  ||#
% 1.09/1.32  
% 1.09/1.32  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.09/1.32  ;      5939 formulas have been input or derived (from 414 formulas).
% 1.09/1.32  ;      2063 (35%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.09/1.32  ;          145 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.09/1.32  ;         1918 (93%) are still being kept.
% 1.09/1.32  ; 
% 1.09/1.32  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.153  18%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.021   2%   Assert                       (634 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.153  18%   Process new row              (5,426 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.119  14%   Resolution                   (826 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.007   1%   Paramodulation               (413 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (47 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.034   4%   Condensing                   (2,820 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.125  15%   Forward subsumption          (2,820 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.044   5%   Backward subsumption         (1,715 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.018   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (3,787 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.099  12%   Forward simplification       (5,339 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.004   0%   Backward simplification      (2,016 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.006   1%   Ordering                     (5,512 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.017   2%   Sortal reasoning             (20,925 calls)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.046   5%   Other
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.848        Total
% 1.09/1.32  ;     0.849        Real time
% 1.09/1.32  ; 
% 1.09/1.32  ; Term-hash-array has 3,714 terms in all.
% 1.09/1.32  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,639 entries (1,642 at peak, 1,715 added, 76 deleted).
% 1.09/1.32  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 10,448 nodes (10,520 at peak, 11,022 added, 574 deleted).
% 1.09/1.32  ;  Retrieved 4,571 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,820 calls.
% 1.09/1.32  ;  Retrieved 549 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,715 calls.
% 1.09/1.32  ; Path-index has 3,660 entries (3,661 at peak, 3,815 added, 155 deleted).
% 1.09/1.32  ; Path-index has 10,901 nodes (10,902 at peak, 11,049 added, 148 deleted).
% 1.09/1.32  ; Trie-index has 3,660 entries (3,661 at peak, 3,815 added, 155 deleted).
% 1.09/1.32  ; Trie-index has 10,410 nodes (10,411 at peak, 10,733 added, 323 deleted).
% 1.09/1.32  ; Retrieved 7,923 generalization terms in 19,686 calls.
% 1.09/1.32  ; Retrieved 514 instance terms in 344 calls.
% 1.09/1.32  ; Retrieved 141,252 unifiable terms in 3,483 calls.
% 1.09/1.32  ; 
% 1.09/1.32  ; The agenda of rows to process has 29 entries:
% 1.09/1.32  ;     6 with value 14              2 with value 21               1 with value 26
% 1.09/1.32  ;     2 with value 15              1 with value 22               2 with value 27
% 1.09/1.32  ;     3 with value 16              4 with value 23               1 with value 29
% 1.09/1.32  ;     1 with value 18              2 with value 24               2 with value 30
% 1.09/1.32  ;     2 with value 19
% 1.09/1.32  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 300 entries:
% 1.09/1.32  ;     1 with value 19             19 with value 27               3 with value 35
% 1.09/1.32  ;    24 with value 20             12 with value 28              17 with value 37
% 1.09/1.32  ;    17 with value 21             11 with value 29               1 with value 39
% 1.09/1.32  ;    22 with value 22             46 with value 30               1 with value 40
% 1.09/1.32  ;    11 with value 23              7 with value 31               3 with value 41
% 1.09/1.32  ;    13 with value 24              5 with value 32              12 with value 44
% 1.09/1.32  ;    47 with value 25              5 with value 33               2 with value 50
% 1.09/1.32  ;    15 with value 26              4 with value 34               2 with value 51
% 1.09/1.32  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1220 entries:
% 1.09/1.32  ;     1 with value (4 5)          53 with value (4 20)          10 with value (4 34)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    17 with value (4 7)          51 with value (4 21)           6 with value (4 35)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    11 with value (4 8)          56 with value (4 22)          11 with value (4 36)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    18 with value (4 9)          77 with value (4 23)          17 with value (4 37)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    40 with value (4 10)         47 with value (4 24)           9 with value (4 38)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    32 with value (4 11)         52 with value (4 25)           4 with value (4 39)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    40 with value (4 12)         46 with value (4 26)           6 with value (4 40)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    39 with value (4 13)         37 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 41)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    39 with value (4 14)         69 with value (4 28)           4 with value (4 42)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    77 with value (4 15)         27 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 43)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    42 with value (4 16)         27 with value (4 30)           4 with value (4 44)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    61 with value (4 17)         28 with value (4 31)           2 with value (4 45)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    42 with value (4 18)         27 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 48)
% 1.09/1.32  ;    60 with value (4 19)         28 with value (4 33)
% 1.09/1.32  Evaluation took:
% 1.09/1.32    0.85 seconds of real time
% 1.09/1.32    0.771124 seconds of user run time
% 1.09/1.32    0.079371 seconds of system run time
% 1.09/1.32    [Run times include 0.068 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.09/1.32    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.09/1.32    0 page faults and
% 1.09/1.32    65,346,344 bytes consed.
% 1.09/1.32  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.09/1.32  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-03T20:00:11
% 1.09/1.32  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.09/1.32  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------