TSTP Solution File: ITP209^2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : ITP209^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:34:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   37
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   65 (  29 unt;  34 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  110 (  52 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  336 (   5   ~;   0   |;   6   &; 292   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   94 (  94   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   36 (  32 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  33  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  110 (  43   ^  37   !;   0   ?; 110   :)
%                                         (  30  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_6,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    syntax_ac_operator: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    syntax7388354845996824322omatch: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X0 > X1 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    syntax2379306206330768139omatch: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X0 > X1 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    a2: a ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    b: a ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    c: a ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    f: a > a > a ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    sK0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    sK1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    sK2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    sK3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    sK4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    sK6: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_26,type,
    sK7: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_27,type,
    sK8: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    sK9: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    sK10: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    sK11: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_31,type,
    sK12: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_32,type,
    sK13: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_33,type,
    sK14: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_34,type,
    sK15: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_35,type,
    sK16: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_36,type,
    sK17: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_37,type,
    sK18: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_38,type,
    sK19: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_39,type,
    sK20: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_40,type,
    sK21: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_41,type,
    sK22: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_42,type,
    sK23: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_43,type,
    sK24: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_44,type,
    sK25: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > X0 ) > X0 ) ).

thf(f155,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f154,f138]) ).

thf(f138,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X3: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ X3 @ ( f @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      = ( f @ ( f @ X3 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f137]) ).

thf(f137,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X3: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( f @ X3 @ ( f @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        = ( f @ ( f @ X3 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f136]) ).

thf(f136,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X3: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( f @ Y0 @ ( f @ X2 @ X1 ) )
            = ( f @ ( f @ Y0 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) )
        @ X3 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f135]) ).

thf(f135,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( f @ Y0 @ ( f @ X2 @ X1 ) )
            = ( f @ ( f @ Y0 @ X2 ) @ X1 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f134]) ).

thf(f134,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( f @ Y1 @ ( f @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
                = ( f @ ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) @ X1 ) ) )
        @ X2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f133]) ).

thf(f133,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( f @ Y1 @ ( f @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
                = ( f @ ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) @ X1 ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f132]) ).

thf(f132,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( !! @ a
                @ ^ [Y2: a] :
                    ( ( f @ Y2 @ ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
                    = ( f @ ( f @ Y2 @ Y1 ) @ Y0 ) ) ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f125]) ).

thf(f125,plain,
    ( ( !! @ a
      @ ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( !! @ a
              @ ^ [Y2: a] :
                  ( ( f @ Y2 @ ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
                  = ( f @ ( f @ Y2 @ Y1 ) @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f124]) ).

thf(f124,plain,
    ( ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( f @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                = ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
      & ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( !! @ a
                @ ^ [Y2: a] :
                    ( ( f @ Y2 @ ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) )
                    = ( f @ ( f @ Y2 @ Y1 ) @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a > a > a] :
          ( ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( !! @ a
                @ ^ [Y2: a] :
                    ( ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                    = ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
          & ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( !! @ a
                @ ^ [Y2: a] :
                    ( !! @ a
                    @ ^ [Y3: a] :
                        ( ( Y0 @ Y3 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                        = ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 ) @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) )
      @ f )
    = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f58,f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType] :
      ( syntax_ac_operator
      @ ( X0
        = ( ^ [Y0: X0 > X0 > X0] :
              ( ( !! @ X0
                @ ^ [Y1: X0] :
                    ( !! @ X0
                    @ ^ [Y2: X0] :
                        ( ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                        = ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
              & ( !! @ X0
                @ ^ [Y1: X0] :
                    ( !! @ X0
                    @ ^ [Y2: X0] :
                        ( !! @ X0
                        @ ^ [Y3: X0] :
                            ( ( Y0 @ Y3 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                            = ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 ) @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType] :
      ( syntax_ac_operator
      @ ( X0
        = ( ^ [Y0: X0 > X0 > X0] :
              ( ( !! @ X0
                @ ^ [Y1: X0] :
                    ( !! @ X0
                    @ ^ [Y2: X0] :
                        ( ( Y0 @ Y1 @ Y2 )
                        = ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) )
              & ( !! @ X0
                @ ^ [Y1: X0] :
                    ( !! @ X0
                    @ ^ [Y2: X0] :
                        ( !! @ X0
                        @ ^ [Y3: X0] :
                            ( ( Y0 @ Y3 @ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y1 ) )
                            = ( Y0 @ ( Y0 @ Y3 @ Y2 ) @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType] :
      ( ( ( ^ [X1: X0 > X0 > X0] :
              ( ! [X2: X0,X3: X0,X4: X0] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X2 @ ( X1 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
                  = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ X4 ) )
              & ! [X5: X0,X6: X0] :
                  ( ( X1 @ X6 @ X5 )
                  = ( X1 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) )
        = syntax_ac_operator )
      @ X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0: $tType] :
      ( ( ( ^ [X11: X0 > X0 > X0] :
              ( ! [X12: X0,X13: X0,X14: X0] :
                  ( ( X11 @ ( X11 @ X12 @ X13 ) @ X14 )
                  = ( X11 @ X12 @ ( X11 @ X13 @ X14 ) ) )
              & ! [X12: X0,X13: X0] :
                  ( ( X11 @ X12 @ X13 )
                  = ( X11 @ X13 @ X12 ) ) ) )
        = syntax_ac_operator )
      @ X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_11_ac__operator__def) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ a @ f )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( syntax_ac_operator @ a @ f )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    syntax_ac_operator @ a @ f,
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    syntax_ac_operator @ a @ f,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_ac__operator__axioms) ).

thf(f154,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ b @ c ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f153,f131]) ).

thf(f131,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( f @ X2 @ X1 )
      = ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f130]) ).

thf(f130,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ( f @ X1 @ X2 )
        = ( f @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f129]) ).

thf(f129,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( f @ X1 @ Y0 )
            = ( f @ Y0 @ X1 ) )
        @ X2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f128]) ).

thf(f128,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( !! @ a
        @ ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( f @ X1 @ Y0 )
            = ( f @ Y0 @ X1 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f127]) ).

thf(f127,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( !! @ a
            @ ^ [Y1: a] :
                ( ( f @ Y0 @ Y1 )
                = ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[],[f126]) ).

thf(f126,plain,
    ( ( !! @ a
      @ ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( !! @ a
          @ ^ [Y1: a] :
              ( ( f @ Y0 @ Y1 )
              = ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f124]) ).

thf(f153,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ c @ b ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f49,f138]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
   != ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,conjecture,
    ( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
    = ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : ITP209^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 18:19:52 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a TH1_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.36  % (26916)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37  % (26910)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26912)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26911)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26913)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26914)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26915)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (26916)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (26909)Success in time 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.37  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------