TSTP Solution File: ITP209^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ITP209^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:34:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 16
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 13 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 12 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 89 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 84 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 20 ( 20 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 13 ( 11 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 ^ 15 !; 0 ?; 16 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
syntax_ac_operator_a: ( a > a > a ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
a2: a ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
b: a ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
c: a ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
f: a > a > a ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
sK0: ( a > a > a ) > a ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
sK1: ( a > a > a ) > a ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
sK2: ( a > a > a ) > a ).
thf(func_def_20,type,
sK3: ( a > a > a ) > a ).
thf(func_def_21,type,
sK4: ( a > a > a ) > a ).
thf(func_def_23,type,
ph6:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f54,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f53,f47]) ).
thf(f47,plain,
! [X2: a,X0: a,X1: a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).
thf(f30,plain,
! [X0: a,X1: a,X2: a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,axiom,
! [X1: a,X2: a,X0: a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ ( f @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= ( f @ ( f @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3_right__assoc) ).
thf(f53,plain,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ b @ c ) ) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f52,f50]) ).
thf(f50,plain,
! [X0: a,X1: a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).
thf(f31,plain,
! [X0: a,X1: a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
! [X1: a,X0: a] :
( ( f @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( f @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1_commute) ).
thf(f52,plain,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ c @ b ) ) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f49,f47]) ).
thf(f49,plain,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
thf(f28,plain,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,negated_conjecture,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f11]) ).
thf(f11,conjecture,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : ITP209^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 16:10:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 % (10073)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10069)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10067)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10070)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10071)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10068)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10074)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (10073)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10072)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (10066)Success in time 0.018 s
% 0.13/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------