TSTP Solution File: ITP189^1 by E---3.2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.2.0
% Problem  : ITP189^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 09:12:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.67s 0.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  123 (   7   ~;   4   |;   0   &; 110   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0   ^  12   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    pi: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    name: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    late_freeRes: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    late_residual: $tType ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    par: pi > pi > pi ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    res: name > pi > pi ).

thf(decl_34,type,
    late_FreeR: late_freeRes > pi > late_residual ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    late_transitions: pi > late_residual > $o ).

thf(decl_48,type,
    fresh_1641682979reeRes: name > late_freeRes > $o ).

thf(decl_101,type,
    p: pi ).

thf(decl_102,type,
    p2: pi ).

thf(decl_104,type,
    q: pi ).

thf(decl_106,type,
    alpha: late_freeRes ).

thf(decl_107,type,
    x: name ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.W1H7tn1a0B/E---3.1_19052.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_11_ResF,axiom,
    ! [X1: pi,X2: late_freeRes,X3: pi,X17: name] :
      ( ( late_transitions @ X1 @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ X3 ) )
     => ( ( fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X17 @ X2 )
       => ( late_transitions @ ( res @ X17 @ X1 ) @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ ( res @ X17 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.W1H7tn1a0B/E---3.1_19052.p',fact_11_ResF) ).

thf(fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062,axiom,
    late_transitions @ ( par @ p @ q ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.W1H7tn1a0B/E---3.1_19052.p',fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062) ).

thf(fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062,axiom,
    fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.W1H7tn1a0B/E---3.1_19052.p',fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1832: pi,X1833: late_freeRes,X1834: pi,X1835: name] :
      ( ~ ( late_transitions @ X1832 @ ( late_FreeR @ X1833 @ X1834 ) )
      | ~ ( fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X1835 @ X1833 )
      | ( late_transitions @ ( res @ X1835 @ X1832 ) @ ( late_FreeR @ X1833 @ ( res @ X1835 @ X1834 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_11_ResF])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( late_transitions @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p @ q ) ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( res @ x @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3: pi,X1: pi,X8: name,X2: late_freeRes] :
      ( ( late_transitions @ ( res @ X8 @ X1 ) @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ ( res @ X8 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ~ ( late_transitions @ X1 @ ( late_FreeR @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X8 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    late_transitions @ ( par @ p @ q ) @ ( late_FreeR @ alpha @ ( par @ p2 @ q ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : ITP189^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 01:44:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.53  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.W1H7tn1a0B/E---3.1_19052.p
% 0.67/0.80  # Version: 3.2.0-ho
% 0.67/0.80  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.67/0.80  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting new_ho_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting sh9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # new_ho_10 with pid 19130 completed with status 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.67/0.80  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.67/0.80  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.67/0.80  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN
% 0.67/0.80  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting sh6 with 487s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting sh2lt with 82s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # new_ho_10 with pid 19137 completed with status 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.67/0.80  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.67/0.80  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.67/0.80  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN
% 0.67/0.80  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting sh6 with 487s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores
% 0.67/0.80  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 0.67/0.80  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.67/0.80  
% 0.67/0.80  # Proof found!
% 0.67/0.80  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.67/0.80  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.67/0.80  # Parsed axioms                        : 434
% 0.67/0.80  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Initial clauses                      : 1034
% 0.67/0.80  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 146
% 0.67/0.80  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 888
% 0.67/0.80  # Processed clauses                    : 1338
% 0.67/0.80  # ...of these trivial                  : 26
% 0.67/0.80  # ...subsumed                          : 108
% 0.67/0.80  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1204
% 0.67/0.80  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 136
% 0.67/0.80  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.67/0.80  # Generated clauses                    : 865
% 0.67/0.80  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 583
% 0.67/0.80  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Paramodulations                      : 608
% 0.67/0.80  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.67/0.80  # NegExts                              : 5
% 0.67/0.80  # Equation resolutions                 : 177
% 0.67/0.80  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Total rewrite steps                  : 147
% 0.67/0.80  # ...of those cached                   : 63
% 0.67/0.80  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.67/0.80  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.67/0.80  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.67/0.80  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.67/0.80  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.67/0.80  # Current number of processed clauses  : 355
% 0.67/0.80  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 89
% 0.67/0.80  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.67/0.80  #    Negative unit clauses             : 60
% 0.67/0.80  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 205
% 0.67/0.80  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 900
% 0.67/0.80  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2997
% 0.67/0.80  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # Current number of archived clauses   : 819
% 0.67/0.80  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 275887
% 0.67/0.80  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 80767
% 0.67/0.80  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 69
% 0.67/0.80  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3372
% 0.67/0.80  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.67/0.80  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 35
% 0.67/0.80  # BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 0.67/0.80  # Condensation attempts                : 1338
% 0.67/0.80  # Condensation successes               : 2
% 0.67/0.80  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 92469
% 0.67/0.80  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 17892
% 0.67/0.80  
% 0.67/0.80  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.80  # User time                : 0.217 s
% 0.67/0.80  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.67/0.80  # Total time               : 0.236 s
% 0.67/0.80  # Maximum resident set size: 6140 pages
% 0.67/0.80  
% 0.67/0.80  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.67/0.80  # User time                : 0.594 s
% 0.67/0.80  # System time              : 0.034 s
% 0.67/0.80  # Total time               : 0.628 s
% 0.67/0.80  # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.67/0.80  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.67/0.80  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------