TSTP Solution File: ITP173^1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ITP173^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:16:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.48s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 7 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 12 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 2 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 ^ 3 !; 0 ?; 3 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
heap_S1465075775_j_k_l: $tType ).
thf(decl_82,type,
type_w697503069_j_k_l: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l > $o ).
thf(decl_162,type,
type_w92696601_j_k_l: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l > $o ).
thf(decl_180,type,
h: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l ).
thf(conj_3,conjecture,
type_w697503069_j_k_l @ h,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).
thf(fact_1_ShadowRootClass_Otype__wf_092_060_094sub_062E_092_060_094sub_062l_092_060_094sub_062e_092_060_094sub_062m_092_060_094sub_062e_092_060_094sub_062n_092_060_094sub_062t,axiom,
! [X1: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l] :
( ( type_w92696601_j_k_l @ X1 )
=> ( type_w697503069_j_k_l @ X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1_ShadowRootClass_Otype__wf_092_060_094sub_062E_092_060_094sub_062l_092_060_094sub_062e_092_060_094sub_062m_092_060_094sub_062e_092_060_094sub_062n_092_060_094sub_062t) ).
thf(conj_2,hypothesis,
type_w92696601_j_k_l @ h,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_2) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( type_w697503069_j_k_l @ h ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_3])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( type_w697503069_j_k_l @ h ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1690: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l] :
( ~ ( type_w92696601_j_k_l @ X1690 )
| ( type_w697503069_j_k_l @ X1690 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_1_ShadowRootClass_Otype__wf_092_060_094sub_062E_092_060_094sub_062l_092_060_094sub_062e_092_060_094sub_062m_092_060_094sub_062e_092_060_094sub_062n_092_060_094sub_062t])])]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( type_w697503069_j_k_l @ h ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1: heap_S1465075775_j_k_l] :
( ( type_w697503069_j_k_l @ X1 )
| ~ ( type_w92696601_j_k_l @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
type_w92696601_j_k_l @ h,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_2]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : ITP173^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 18:45:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.48/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHSA.
% 0.48/0.55 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_bool_8 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_ho_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting additional_ho_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting ehoh_best with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting full_lambda_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # new_bool_8 with pid 3770 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Result found by new_bool_8
% 0.48/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHSA.
% 0.48/0.55 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_bool_8 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.48/0.55 # Search class: HGUSM-FFLS33-DHSFFSNN
% 0.48/0.55 # partial match(4): HGUSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 0.48/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_ho_10 with 325s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_bool_8 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # new_ho_10 with pid 3777 completed with status 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.48/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHSA.
% 0.48/0.55 # Scheduled 7 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_bool_8 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 0.48/0.55 # Search class: HGUSM-FFLS33-DHSFFSNN
% 0.48/0.55 # partial match(4): HGUSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 0.48/0.55 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.48/0.55 # Starting new_ho_10 with 325s (1) cores
% 0.48/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.48/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.48/0.55
% 0.48/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.48/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.48/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 555
% 0.48/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 439
% 0.48/0.55 # Initial clauses : 142
% 0.48/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.48/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 136
% 0.48/0.55 # Processed clauses : 147
% 0.48/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.48/0.55 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.48/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 143
% 0.48/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.48/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.48/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.48/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.48/0.55 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.48/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.48/0.55 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.48/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.48/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.48/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.48/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.48/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 122
% 0.48/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 326
% 0.48/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 134
% 0.48/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2592
% 0.48/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1835
% 0.48/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.48/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.48/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 147
% 0.48/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.48/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 25926
% 0.48/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 9776
% 0.48/0.55
% 0.48/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.55 # User time : 0.027 s
% 0.48/0.55 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.48/0.55 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.48/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 4640 pages
% 0.48/0.55
% 0.48/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.48/0.55 # User time : 0.074 s
% 0.48/0.55 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.48/0.55 # Total time : 0.090 s
% 0.48/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 3264 pages
% 0.48/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.48/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------