TSTP Solution File: ITP158^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP158^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:16:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.95s 1.01s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   37
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   61 (  11 unt;  31 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  329 (  24   ~;  18   |;   3   &; 276   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :   10 (   9 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   51 (  51   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   24 (  22 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   1   ^  43   !;   2   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    list_nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    list_P512754263e_form: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    prover1687215943e_form: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort5,type,
    set_nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort6,type,
    list_P796095576elle_U: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort7,type,
    set_Pr619177522elle_U: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort8,type,
    produc227817602le_U_o: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort9,type,
    prover_Mirabelle_U: $tType ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    append1038020460e_form: list_P512754263e_form > list_P512754263e_form > list_P512754263e_form ).

thf(decl_52,type,
    cons_P1475164433e_form: prover1687215943e_form > list_P512754263e_form > list_P512754263e_form ).

thf(decl_58,type,
    nil_Pr1384483009e_form: list_P512754263e_form ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    set_nat2: list_nat > set_nat ).

thf(decl_94,type,
    produc1069574002le_U_o: set_Pr619177522elle_U > ( nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o ) > produc227817602le_U_o ).

thf(decl_95,type,
    prover1282070756_SEval: produc227817602le_U_o > ( nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ) > list_P512754263e_form > $o ).

thf(decl_96,type,
    prover1539709396Svalid: list_P512754263e_form > $o ).

thf(decl_97,type,
    prover1577896257_finst: prover1687215943e_form > nat > prover1687215943e_form ).

thf(decl_100,type,
    prover571163162e_FAll: prover1687215943e_form > prover1687215943e_form ).

thf(decl_102,type,
    prover1847600056is_env: produc227817602le_U_o > ( nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ) > $o ).

thf(decl_105,type,
    prover_Mirabelle_sfv: list_P512754263e_form > list_nat ).

thf(decl_113,type,
    member_nat: nat > set_nat > $o ).

thf(decl_125,type,
    a: set_Pr619177522elle_U ).

thf(decl_126,type,
    b: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o ).

thf(decl_127,type,
    f: prover1687215943e_form ).

thf(decl_128,type,
    s: list_P512754263e_form ).

thf(decl_129,type,
    u: nat ).

thf(decl_131,type,
    esk2_1: list_P512754263e_form > produc227817602le_U_o ).

thf(decl_132,type,
    esk3_1: list_P512754263e_form > nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ).

thf(decl_439,type,
    esk290_1: produc227817602le_U_o > set_Pr619177522elle_U ).

thf(decl_440,type,
    epred21_1: produc227817602le_U_o > nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o ).

thf(decl_586,type,
    esk429_0: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ).

thf(fact_23_Svalid__def,axiom,
    ( prover1539709396Svalid
    = ( ^ [X34: list_P512754263e_form] :
        ! [X35: produc227817602le_U_o,X36: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
          ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ X35 @ X36 )
         => ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X35 @ X36 @ X34 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_23_Svalid__def) ).

thf(conj_2,conjecture,
    ! [X870: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
      ( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 )
      | ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_2) ).

thf(conj_1,hypothesis,
    ! [X867: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X868: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o,X869: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
      ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X867 @ X868 ) @ X869 )
     => ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X867 @ X868 ) @ X869 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

thf(fact_193_surj__pair,axiom,
    ! [X472: produc227817602le_U_o] :
    ? [X473: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X474: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o] :
      ( X472
      = ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X473 @ X474 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_193_surj__pair) ).

thf(fact_4_sound__FAll,axiom,
    ! [X11: nat,X12: prover1687215943e_form,X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ~ ( member_nat @ X11 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) )
     => ( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X5 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X12 @ X11 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
       => ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_4_sound__FAll) ).

thf(conj_0,hypothesis,
    ~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2219: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2219 )
    <=> ! [X35: produc227817602le_U_o,X36: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
          ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ X35 @ X36 )
         => ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X35 @ X36 @ X2219 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_23_Svalid__def])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X870: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
        ( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 )
        | ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ! [X3762: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X3763: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o,X3764: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
      ( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X3762 @ X3763 ) @ X3764 )
      | ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X3762 @ X3763 ) @ X3764 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_1])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X3075: produc227817602le_U_o] :
      ( X3075
      = ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ ( esk290_1 @ X3075 ) @ ( epred21_1 @ X3075 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_193_surj__pair])]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2279: list_P512754263e_form,X2280: produc227817602le_U_o,X2281: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U,X2282: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ( ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2279 )
        | ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ X2280 @ X2281 )
        | ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X2280 @ X2281 @ X2279 ) )
      & ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( esk2_1 @ X2282 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X2282 ) )
        | ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2282 ) )
      & ( ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( esk2_1 @ X2282 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X2282 ) @ X2282 )
        | ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2282 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 )
    & ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X11: nat,X12: prover1687215943e_form,X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ~ ( member_nat @ X11 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) )
     => ( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X5 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X12 @ X11 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
       => ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_sound__FAll]) ).

thf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ! [X392: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o,X391: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X4: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
      ( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X391 @ X392 ) @ X4 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
      | ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X391 @ X392 ) @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3: produc227817602le_U_o] :
      ( X3
      = ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ ( esk290_1 @ X3 ) @ ( epred21_1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3: produc227817602le_U_o,X5: list_P512754263e_form,X4: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
      ( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 )
      | ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 )
      | ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2240: nat,X2241: prover1687215943e_form,X2242: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ( member_nat @ X2240 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X2241 ) @ X2242 ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X2242 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X2241 @ X2240 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
      | ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X2241 ) @ X2242 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 )
      | ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( esk2_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ! [X3: produc227817602le_U_o,X4: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
      ( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X3 @ X4 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
      | ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( esk2_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) )
      | ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
      ( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 @ X5 )
      | ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X1: prover1687215943e_form,X5: list_P512754263e_form,X8: nat] :
      ( ( member_nat @ X8 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X1 ) @ X5 ) ) ) )
      | ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X1 ) @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X5 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X1 @ X8 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem    : ITP158^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 16:15:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.01  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.95/1.01  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 0.95/1.01  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting sh7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting new_bool_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 3095 completed with status 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.95/1.01  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 0.95/1.01  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.95/1.01  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN
% 0.95/1.01  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting almost_fo_1 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting post_as_ho3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # full_lambda_10 with pid 3105 completed with status 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Result found by full_lambda_10
% 0.95/1.01  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 0.95/1.01  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.95/1.01  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN
% 0.95/1.01  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting almost_fo_1 with 811s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting post_as_ho3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.01  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.95/1.01  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.95/1.01  
% 0.95/1.01  # Proof found!
% 0.95/1.01  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.95/1.01  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.95/1.01  # Parsed axioms                        : 505
% 0.95/1.01  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Initial clauses                      : 927
% 0.95/1.01  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 166
% 0.95/1.01  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 761
% 0.95/1.01  # Processed clauses                    : 2317
% 0.95/1.01  # ...of these trivial                  : 43
% 0.95/1.01  # ...subsumed                          : 441
% 0.95/1.01  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1833
% 0.95/1.01  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1391
% 0.95/1.01  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.95/1.01  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.95/1.01  # Generated clauses                    : 14413
% 0.95/1.01  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12596
% 0.95/1.01  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.95/1.01  # Paramodulations                      : 12925
% 0.95/1.01  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # NegExts                              : 12
% 0.95/1.01  # Equation resolutions                 : 1423
% 0.95/1.01  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1103
% 0.95/1.01  # ...of those cached                   : 775
% 0.95/1.01  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.95/1.01  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.95/1.01  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.95/1.01  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.95/1.01  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.95/1.01  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1053
% 0.95/1.01  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 125
% 0.95/1.01  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 0.95/1.01  #    Negative unit clauses             : 70
% 0.95/1.01  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 841
% 0.95/1.01  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11670
% 0.95/1.01  # ...number of literals in the above   : 39407
% 0.95/1.01  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Current number of archived clauses   : 662
% 0.95/1.01  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 89247
% 0.95/1.01  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63575
% 0.95/1.01  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 226
% 0.95/1.01  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7450
% 0.95/1.01  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15084
% 0.95/1.01  # BW rewrite match successes           : 20
% 0.95/1.01  # Condensation attempts                : 2317
% 0.95/1.01  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.95/1.01  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 736305
% 0.95/1.01  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 21062
% 0.95/1.01  
% 0.95/1.01  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/1.01  # User time                : 0.487 s
% 0.95/1.01  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.95/1.01  # Total time               : 0.504 s
% 0.95/1.01  # Maximum resident set size: 6808 pages
% 0.95/1.01  
% 0.95/1.01  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/1.01  # User time                : 2.199 s
% 0.95/1.01  # System time              : 0.099 s
% 0.95/1.01  # Total time               : 2.298 s
% 0.95/1.01  # Maximum resident set size: 2980 pages
% 0.95/1.01  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.95/1.01  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------