TSTP Solution File: ITP116^2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ITP116^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:33:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 108.08s 13.93s
% Output : Refutation 108.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ITP116^2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 17:06:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a TH1_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40 % (1534)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1536)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1539)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1540)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1538)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1537)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1535)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.40 % (1541)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Memory used [KB]: 1918
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1540)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1542)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1543)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1544)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Time elapsed: 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1536)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41 % (1545)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % (1544)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Memory used [KB]: 1791
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % (1543)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % (1546)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:chr=on:plsq=on:slsq=on:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1547)lrs+10_1:1_acc=on:amm=sco:cs=on:tgt=full:i=16:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.43 % (1546)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)lrs+21_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fd=preordered:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=11:inj=on:kws=precedence:s2pl=no:sp=weighted_frequency:tgt=full:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.43
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.43 % (1548)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Memory used [KB]: 2174
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Time elapsed: 0.027 s
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)Instructions burned: 38 (million)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1542)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)lrs+2_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=preordered:cnfonf=off:cs=on:ixr=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Memory used [KB]: 1791
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1547)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1551)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)Memory used [KB]: 6780
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)Time elapsed: 0.048 s
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)Instructions burned: 70 (million)
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1539)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.44 % (1555)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=off:cs=on:hud=3:prag=on:sup=off:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)dis+1002_1:1_add=large:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:prag=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1555)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.45 % (1556)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1561)lrs+10_1:1_e2e=on:sd=1:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=710:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/710Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1560)lrs+1002_1:1_anc=all_dependent:au=on:cbe=off:fde=unused:ntd=on:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1558)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.46 % (1562)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1564)dis+1002_5:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fs=off:fsr=off:sos=on:i=902:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/902Mi)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1565)dis+21_1:8_apa=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:fsr=off:hud=0:ins=1:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=21:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/21Mi)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.47
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Memory used [KB]: 1791
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.47 % (1560)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:i=5:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)lrs+2_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:cs=on:fe=off:hud=10:inj=on:ins=3:plsq=on:plsqc=1:sd=10:ss=axioms:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1569)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1573)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.48
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Memory used [KB]: 1918
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.48 % (1565)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 % (1579)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=377:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/377Mi)
% 0.21/0.49 % (1587)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:sp=const_min:ss=axioms:sup=off:i=19:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/19Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1585)dis+1010_1:4_atotf=0.2:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fe=off:ins=2:ntd=on:s2a=on:s2at=5.0:sgt=5:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=779:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/779Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1588)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=1:sgt=50:ss=axioms:i=879:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/879Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Memory used [KB]: 1791
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (1587)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Time elapsed: 0.112 s
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)Instructions burned: 184 (million)
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (1534)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 % (1596)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/17Mi)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Memory used [KB]: 1791
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1596)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)ott+21_1:1_apa=on:au=on:cnfonf=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 % (1602)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 % (1613)lrs+1010_1:8_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:tnu=5:i=30:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/30Mi)
% 0.21/0.53 % (1615)dis+10_1:1_ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:s2a=on:i=127:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/127Mi)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)Time elapsed: 0.091 s
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)Instructions burned: 138 (million)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1564)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.54
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)Instructions burned: 30 (million)
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54 % (1613)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55 % (1631)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:cond=on:hi=on:i=100:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/100Mi)
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.21/0.55
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.55 % (1634)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.56 % (1639)lrs+10_8:1_au=on:avsq=on:e2e=on:ins=3:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:ss=axioms:i=20:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/20Mi)
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.50/0.57
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Memory used [KB]: 1918
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)Instructions burned: 22 (million)
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)------------------------------
% 1.50/0.57 % (1639)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.58 % (1647)dis+1002_1:1_cbe=off:hud=5:nm=4:plsq=on:plsqr=7,1:prag=on:sp=const_max:tnu=1:i=86:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/86Mi)
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.66/0.58
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Time elapsed: 0.033 s
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)Instructions burned: 103 (million)
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.58 % (1631)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.66/0.58
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Memory used [KB]: 7036
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Time elapsed: 0.047 s
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)Instructions burned: 127 (million)
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.58 % (1615)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.59 % (1648)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:nm=2:ntd=on:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=107:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/107Mi)
% 1.66/0.59 % (1649)lrs+2_1:1024_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=15:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=39:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/39Mi)
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.66/0.60
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Memory used [KB]: 2174
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)Instructions burned: 41 (million)
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.60 % (1649)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.66/0.61
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Time elapsed: 0.029 s
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)Instructions burned: 86 (million)
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.61 % (1647)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.61 % (1651)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen:fsr=off:kws=precedence:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=448:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/448Mi)
% 1.66/0.61 % (1653)lrs+10_1:512_au=on:fde=unused:lma=on:nm=32:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=16121663,131072:sfv=off:sp=const_max:ss=axioms:st=3.0:tgt=full:i=46:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/46Mi)
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.66/0.62
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Time elapsed: 0.036 s
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)Instructions burned: 107 (million)
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)------------------------------
% 1.66/0.62 % (1648)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Termination phase: SInE selection
% 1.98/0.63
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)Instructions burned: 46 (million)
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.63 % (1653)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.63 % (1654)lrs+10_1:10_au=on:av=off:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:ntd=on:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=98:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/98Mi)
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.98/0.64
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Time elapsed: 0.175 s
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)Instructions burned: 378 (million)
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.64 % (1579)------------------------------
% 1.98/0.64 % (1655)ott+1002_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=off:fd=off:sos=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=507:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/507Mi)
% 2.17/0.65 % (1656)dis+1010_2:3_amm=off:fd=preordered:ixr=off:nm=0:pe=on:piset=equals:prag=on:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=149:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/149Mi)
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 2.17/0.66
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Time elapsed: 0.031 s
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)Instructions burned: 100 (million)
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.66 % (1654)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.67 % (1662)lrs+21_1:16_au=on:bd=off:piset=and:i=39:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/39Mi)
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 2.17/0.68
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)Instructions burned: 39 (million)
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.68 % (1662)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)lrs+1004_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:gs=on:hud=10:prag=on:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/6Mi)
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Termination phase: shuffling
% 2.17/0.69
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.69 % (1672)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.17/0.70
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Memory used [KB]: 7291
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Time elapsed: 0.053 s
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)Instructions burned: 150 (million)
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.70 % (1656)------------------------------
% 2.17/0.70 % (1678)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:e2e=on:nm=2:nwc=10.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=1087:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/1087Mi)
% 2.17/0.71 % (1680)dis+10_1:1_aac=none:cs=on:i=47:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/47Mi)
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Termination phase: shuffling
% 2.60/0.72
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Memory used [KB]: 2174
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Time elapsed: 0.018 s
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)Instructions burned: 48 (million)
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.72 % (1680)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.73 % (1692)lrs+1010_1:128_av=off:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fsr=off:ntd=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=44:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/44Mi)
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.60/0.73
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Time elapsed: 0.300 s
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)Instructions burned: 710 (million)
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.73 % (1561)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.74 % (1700)dis+10_1:1_av=off:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:tnu=1:i=432:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/432Mi)
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Termination phase: shuffling
% 2.60/0.75
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)Instructions burned: 45 (million)
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.75 % (1692)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.76 % (1704)lrs+10_7:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:i=62:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/62Mi)
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.60/0.76
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Memory used [KB]: 8955
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Time elapsed: 0.153 s
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)Instructions burned: 450 (million)
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)------------------------------
% 2.60/0.76 % (1651)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.98/0.77
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Memory used [KB]: 9210
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Time elapsed: 0.279 s
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)Instructions burned: 779 (million)
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.77 % (1585)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.77 % (1712)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/31Mi)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 2.98/0.78
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Time elapsed: 0.021 s
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)Instructions burned: 65 (million)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1704)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (1588)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 2.98/0.78
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)Memory used [KB]: 8443
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)Time elapsed: 0.276 s
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)Instructions burned: 781 (million)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1588)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1717)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/96Mi)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1719)lrs+1002_1:4_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:hud=15:inj=on:nwc=4.0:s2a=on:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity:i=453:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/453Mi)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 2.98/0.78
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)Instructions burned: 31 (million)
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.78 % (1712)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.79 % (1725)lrs-1004_1:1_au=on:bsd=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fe=axiom:fsd=on:i=71:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/71Mi)
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.98/0.79
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Memory used [KB]: 10234
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Time elapsed: 0.381 s
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)Instructions burned: 1042 (million)
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.79 % (1545)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.79 % (1727)dis+1002_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:ntd=on:s2a=on:ss=axioms:i=83:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 2.98/0.80 % (1730)lrs+10_1:128_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:hud=1:ins=1:i=11:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/11Mi)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Termination phase: shuffling
% 2.98/0.81
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Memory used [KB]: 1663
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1730)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.98/0.81
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Time elapsed: 0.174 s
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)Instructions burned: 508 (million)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1655)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.98/0.81
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Time elapsed: 0.032 s
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)Instructions burned: 97 (million)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1717)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 2.98/0.81
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Time elapsed: 0.025 s
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)Instructions burned: 71 (million)
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1725)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.81 % (1737)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fsr=off:spb=non_intro:i=41:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/41Mi)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/6Mi)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1744)dis+10_1:1_avsq=on:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:nm=32:i=150:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/150Mi)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1747)ott+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=7:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=343:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/343Mi)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Termination phase: shuffling
% 2.98/0.82
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Memory used [KB]: 1535
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.82 % (1742)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.98/0.82
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Memory used [KB]: 6780
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Time elapsed: 0.031 s
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)Instructions burned: 84 (million)
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.82 % (1727)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Termination phase: shuffling
% 2.98/0.83
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)Instructions burned: 42 (million)
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.83 % (1737)------------------------------
% 2.98/0.83 % (1753)ott+1010_1:4_cbe=off:chr=on:hfsq=on:hfsqr=1,16:hud=3:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tnu=2:i=109:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/109Mi)
% 2.98/0.83 % (1754)dis+10_1:1_au=on:c=on:e2e=on:fsr=off:sos=all:sp=const_frequency:ss=axioms:i=253:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/253Mi)
% 2.98/0.84 % (1757)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:sd=1:sgt=16:ss=axioms:i=140:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/140Mi)
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)------------------------------
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.44/0.87
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Time elapsed: 0.035 s
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)Instructions burned: 112 (million)
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)------------------------------
% 3.44/0.87 % (1753)------------------------------
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)------------------------------
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.44/0.87
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Memory used [KB]: 7291
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Time elapsed: 0.073 s
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)Instructions burned: 152 (million)
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)------------------------------
% 3.44/0.87 % (1744)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.87 % (1791)dis+1010_16:1_acc=model:au=on:avsq=on:cond=fast:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsqr=9267,262144:i=614:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/614Mi)
% 3.55/0.88 % (1797)lrs+1002_1:1_e2e=on:fde=unused:fe=axiom:prag=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=202:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/202Mi)
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.55/0.88
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Time elapsed: 0.049 s
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)Instructions burned: 141 (million)
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.88 % (1757)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.55/0.88
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Memory used [KB]: 5117
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Time elapsed: 0.142 s
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)Instructions burned: 432 (million)
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.88 % (1700)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.89 % (1809)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:cs=on:ins=3:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=339:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/339Mi)
% 3.55/0.89 % (1812)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=283:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/283Mi)
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.55/0.91
% 3.55/0.91
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)Memory used [KB]: 7036
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)Time elapsed: 0.029 s
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)Instructions burned: 84 (million)
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.91 % (1797)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.55/0.92 % (1821)dis+2_1:1_cha=on:hud=7:nwc=3.0:prag=on:tnu=2:i=134:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/134Mi)
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.55/0.92
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Time elapsed: 0.107 s
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)Instructions burned: 253 (million)
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.92 % (1754)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Instruction limit reached!
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Termination reason: Unknown
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.55/0.92
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Time elapsed: 0.136 s
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)Instructions burned: 455 (million)
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)------------------------------
% 3.55/0.92 % (1719)------------------------------
% 4.02/0.92 % (1828)dis+1010_1:64_cnfonf=lazy_simp:fd=off:i=298:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/298Mi)
% 4.02/0.93 % (1831)lrs+2_1:8_erd=off:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sos=on:i=192:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/192Mi)
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)------------------------------
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.02/0.94
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Time elapsed: 0.137 s
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)Instructions burned: 345 (million)
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)------------------------------
% 4.02/0.94 % (1747)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.94 % (1836)lrs+10_1:1_bd=off:hud=1:nm=0:prag=on:sd=2:sgt=32:sos=all:ss=axioms:i=258:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/258Mi)
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.15/0.96
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Memory used [KB]: 7036
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Time elapsed: 0.042 s
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)Instructions burned: 134 (million)
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.96 % (1821)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.96 % (1844)lrs+1002_1:1024_au=on:cond=fast:ntd=on:piset=and:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=183491,1048576:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=90:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/90Mi)
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.15/0.98
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Time elapsed: 0.085 s
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)Instructions burned: 284 (million)
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.98 % (1812)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.98 % (1854)dis+1004_16:1_avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:cnfonf=lazy_gen:cs=on:fe=off:tgt=ground:tnu=1:i=231:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/231Mi)
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.15/0.99
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Time elapsed: 0.064 s
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)Instructions burned: 194 (million)
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.99 % (1831)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.15/0.99
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)Instructions burned: 91 (million)
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)------------------------------
% 4.15/0.99 % (1844)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.00 % (1855)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sgt=32:slsq=on:slsqc=1:slsql=off:ss=axioms:i=458:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/458Mi)
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.15/1.00
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Time elapsed: 0.109 s
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)Instructions burned: 340 (million)
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.00 % (1809)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.00 % (1856)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/31Mi)
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.15/1.01
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Time elapsed: 0.083 s
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)Instructions burned: 298 (million)
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.01 % (1828)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.01 % (1857)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:kws=inv_precedence:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:sp=weighted_frequency:ss=axioms:i=297:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/297Mi)
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 4.15/1.01
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)Instructions burned: 32 (million)
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.01 % (1856)------------------------------
% 4.15/1.01 % (1858)dis+2_1:4_amm=off:au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:hfaw=0:hfsq=on:hfsql=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=35,4:sac=on:i=987:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/987Mi)
% 4.15/1.02 % (1859)lrs+10_1:1024_avsq=on:avsqc=4:avsqr=584411,1048576:bd=off:bet=on:br=off:chr=on:fsd=on:fsdmm=1:hud=10:nm=0:ntd=on:nwc=9.0:piset=or:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsql=on:plsqr=852219,1048576:rawr=on:sp=const_frequency:spb=units:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/182Mi)
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.61/1.03
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Time elapsed: 0.084 s
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)Instructions burned: 259 (million)
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.03 % (1836)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.04 % (1865)dis+10_1:1_au=on:e2e=on:fde=none:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/182Mi)
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.61/1.05
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)Instructions burned: 233 (million)
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.05 % (1854)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.61/1.05
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Time elapsed: 0.346 s
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)Instructions burned: 1087 (million)
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.05 % (1678)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.05 % (1871)dis+10_1:8_cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=axiom:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sos=all:i=154:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/154Mi)
% 4.61/1.06 % (1874)dis+1003_1:64_atotf=0.4:au=on:fsr=off:hflw=5:hfsq=on:hfsqc=20:hfsql=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=79:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/79Mi)
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.61/1.06
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Time elapsed: 0.193 s
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)Instructions burned: 616 (million)
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.06 % (1791)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.07 % (1881)dis+1010_5:2_anc=all_dependent:awrs=converge:bd=off:bet=on:c=on:cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fe=axiom:hud=5:kws=precedence:piset=and:prag=on:s2a=on:sac=on:slsq=on:slsqc=1:sp=reverse_arity:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=216:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2993ds/216Mi)
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Instruction limit reached!
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Termination reason: Unknown
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Termination phase: Saturation
% 4.61/1.08
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Time elapsed: 0.058 s
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)Instructions burned: 183 (million)
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)------------------------------
% 4.61/1.08 % (1859)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 5.66/1.08
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)Instructions burned: 81 (million)
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.08 % (1874)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.09 % (1883)lrs+1002_1:1_fe=off:hud=10:ins=2:sac=on:sp=const_frequency:i=114:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/114Mi)
% 5.66/1.09 % (1885)dis+1002_1:1_acc=on:au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=922:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/922Mi)
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.09
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Memory used [KB]: 7291
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Time elapsed: 0.058 s
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)Instructions burned: 182 (million)
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.09 % (1865)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.09
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Time elapsed: 0.042 s
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)Instructions burned: 155 (million)
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.09 % (1871)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.10 % (1892)lrs+10_1:128_au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:nwc=10.0:piset=and:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/182Mi)
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.10
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Time elapsed: 0.094 s
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)Instructions burned: 299 (million)
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.10 % (1857)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.10 % (1894)ott+1010_1:1024_au=on:av=off:c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:piset=equals:s2a=on:sp=occurrence:spb=units:ss=axioms:i=164:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/164Mi)
% 5.66/1.11 % (1895)lrs+1004_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:gs=on:hud=10:prag=on:tnu=1:i=50:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/50Mi)
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.12
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Memory used [KB]: 7164
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Time elapsed: 0.036 s
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)Instructions burned: 114 (million)
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.12 % (1883)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 5.66/1.12
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)Instructions burned: 52 (million)
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.12 % (1895)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.13 % (1902)dis-30_1:1_acc=on:bd=off:fsr=off:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:i=368:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/368Mi)
% 5.66/1.13 % (1904)dis+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:hud=1:nm=3:piset=or:prag=on:s2a=on:sp=const_max:i=1021:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/1021Mi)
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.13
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)Instructions burned: 216 (million)
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.13 % (1881)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (1855)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 5.66/1.14
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)Time elapsed: 0.144 s
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)Instructions burned: 446 (million)
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.14 % (1855)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.14 % (1907)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=267:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/267Mi)
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.15
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Memory used [KB]: 7291
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Time elapsed: 0.049 s
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)Instructions burned: 182 (million)
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.15 % (1892)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Instruction limit reached!
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Termination reason: Unknown
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Termination phase: Saturation
% 5.66/1.15
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Time elapsed: 0.048 s
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)Instructions burned: 167 (million)
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.15 % (1894)------------------------------
% 5.66/1.15 % (1909)dis+21_1:5_au=on:ntd=on:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=204:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/204Mi)
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)dis+2_1:1024_atotf=0.0802881:au=on:bs=unit_only:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fde=none:nwc=10.0:prag=on:i=26:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/26Mi)
% 6.18/1.16 % (1915)dis+1002_1:1_bd=preordered:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:hud=10:ixr=off:prag=on:i=53:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/53Mi)
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)------------------------------
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Termination phase: shuffling
% 6.18/1.16
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)------------------------------
% 6.18/1.16 % (1914)------------------------------
% 6.18/1.17 % (1924)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:e2e=on:nm=2:nwc=10.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=4436:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/4436Mi)
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)------------------------------
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 6.18/1.17
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)Instructions burned: 57 (million)
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)------------------------------
% 6.18/1.17 % (1915)------------------------------
% 6.18/1.18 % (1930)dis+1010_1:1_acc=model:avsq=on:ixr=off:prag=on:s2a=on:sac=on:i=1539:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2992ds/1539Mi)
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)------------------------------
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.25/1.21
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Time elapsed: 0.064 s
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)Instructions burned: 204 (million)
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)------------------------------
% 6.25/1.21 % (1909)------------------------------
% 6.25/1.22 % (1952)lrs+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:kws=inv_precedence:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sos=on:i=408:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2991ds/408Mi)
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)------------------------------
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.25/1.22
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Memory used [KB]: 7803
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Time elapsed: 0.079 s
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)Instructions burned: 267 (million)
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)------------------------------
% 6.25/1.22 % (1907)------------------------------
% 6.44/1.23 % (1953)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=5205:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2991ds/5205Mi)
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)------------------------------
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.45/1.25
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Memory used [KB]: 9338
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Time elapsed: 0.119 s
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)Instructions burned: 368 (million)
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)------------------------------
% 6.45/1.25 % (1902)------------------------------
% 6.45/1.25 % (1954)dis+1010_1:4_au=on:av=off:cbe=off:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=1913:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2991ds/1913Mi)
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)------------------------------
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.64/1.32
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Memory used [KB]: 9850
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Time elapsed: 0.303 s
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)Instructions burned: 989 (million)
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)------------------------------
% 6.64/1.32 % (1858)------------------------------
% 6.64/1.33 % (1955)lrs+2_1:1_bd=off:cbe=off:piset=equals:sd=1:sgt=20:sos=all:ss=axioms:i=4350:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2990ds/4350Mi)
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)------------------------------
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.64/1.35
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Time elapsed: 0.129 s
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)Instructions burned: 409 (million)
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)------------------------------
% 6.64/1.35 % (1952)------------------------------
% 6.64/1.36 % (1956)ott+1010_1:4_cbe=off:chr=on:hfsq=on:hfsqr=1,16:hud=3:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tnu=2:i=68:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2990ds/68Mi)
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.80/1.38
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Memory used [KB]: 8187
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Time elapsed: 0.287 s
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)Instructions burned: 923 (million)
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.38 % (1885)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 6.80/1.38
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Time elapsed: 0.024 s
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)Instructions burned: 71 (million)
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.38 % (1956)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.38 % (1957)dis+10_1:1_au=on:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:sac=on:sd=7:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=358:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2990ds/358Mi)
% 6.80/1.39 % (1958)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2990ds/31Mi)
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 6.80/1.40
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)Instructions burned: 31 (million)
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.40 % (1958)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.40 % (1959)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_simp:sgt=5:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=279:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2989ds/279Mi)
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Instruction limit reached!
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Termination reason: Unknown
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Termination phase: Saturation
% 6.80/1.44
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Time elapsed: 0.311 s
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)Instructions burned: 1022 (million)
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.44 % (1904)------------------------------
% 6.80/1.45 % (1960)lrs+10_8:1_au=on:fde=none:slsq=on:i=258:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2989ds/258Mi)
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Instruction limit reached!
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Termination reason: Unknown
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Termination phase: Saturation
% 7.46/1.49
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Time elapsed: 0.088 s
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)Instructions burned: 281 (million)
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.49 % (1959)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Instruction limit reached!
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Termination reason: Unknown
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Termination phase: Saturation
% 7.46/1.49
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Memory used [KB]: 7547
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Time elapsed: 0.132 s
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)Instructions burned: 358 (million)
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.49 % (1957)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.50 % (1961)dis+2_1:1024_atotf=0.0802881:au=on:bs=unit_only:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fde=none:nwc=10.0:prag=on:i=26:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2988ds/26Mi)
% 7.46/1.50 % (1962)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:pe=on:i=995:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2988ds/995Mi)
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Instruction limit reached!
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Termination reason: Unknown
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Termination phase: shuffling
% 7.46/1.51
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Memory used [KB]: 2046
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.51 % (1961)------------------------------
% 7.46/1.51 % (1963)dis+10_1:8_amm=sco:cbe=off:hflw=5:hfsq=on:hfsqc=14:hfsql=off:hfsqr=4,1:hud=5:ile=on:lma=on:nm=2:ntd=on:prag=on:sac=on:sp=frequency:i=373:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2988ds/373Mi)
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Instruction limit reached!
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)------------------------------
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Termination reason: Unknown
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Termination phase: Saturation
% 7.69/1.53
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Time elapsed: 0.083 s
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)Instructions burned: 259 (million)
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)------------------------------
% 7.69/1.53 % (1960)------------------------------
% 7.77/1.54 % (1964)lrs+1010_1:128_au=on:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:hflw=4:hfsq=on:hfsqc=20:hfsql=off:i=253:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2988ds/253Mi)
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Instruction limit reached!
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)------------------------------
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Termination reason: Unknown
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Termination phase: Saturation
% 7.77/1.61
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Time elapsed: 0.071 s
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)Instructions burned: 253 (million)
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)------------------------------
% 7.77/1.61 % (1964)------------------------------
% 7.77/1.62 % (1965)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=832:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2987ds/832Mi)
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Instruction limit reached!
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Termination reason: Unknown
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Termination phase: Saturation
% 9.96/1.63
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Time elapsed: 0.118 s
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)Instructions burned: 373 (million)
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.63 % (1963)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.64 % (1966)lrs+1010_1:1_chr=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:gs=on:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=5,1:prag=on:rawr=on:i=668:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2987ds/668Mi)
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Instruction limit reached!
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Termination reason: Unknown
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Termination phase: Saturation
% 9.96/1.65
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Memory used [KB]: 10618
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Time elapsed: 0.468 s
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)Instructions burned: 1540 (million)
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.65 % (1930)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.66 % (1967)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=40:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2987ds/40Mi)
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 9.96/1.66
% 9.96/1.66
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)Time elapsed: 0.048 s
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)Instructions burned: 150 (million)
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.66 % (1965)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Instruction limit reached!
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Termination reason: Unknown
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Termination phase: shuffling
% 9.96/1.67
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Memory used [KB]: 2174
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)Instructions burned: 41 (million)
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.67 % (1967)------------------------------
% 9.96/1.67 % (1968)lrs+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fd=off:ntd=on:sd=1:sgt=32:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=294:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2986ds/294Mi)
% 9.96/1.68 % (1969)dis+1010_1:1_avsq=on:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=187:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2986ds/187Mi)
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Instruction limit reached!
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)------------------------------
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Termination reason: Unknown
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Termination phase: Saturation
% 10.42/1.74
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Memory used [KB]: 7547
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)Instructions burned: 188 (million)
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)------------------------------
% 10.42/1.74 % (1969)------------------------------
% 10.42/1.75 % (1970)lrs+1010_2:3_au=on:fsr=off:sd=4:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=371:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2986ds/371Mi)
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Instruction limit reached!
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)------------------------------
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Termination reason: Unknown
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Termination phase: Saturation
% 10.42/1.76
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Memory used [KB]: 8187
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Time elapsed: 0.089 s
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)Instructions burned: 296 (million)
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)------------------------------
% 10.42/1.76 % (1968)------------------------------
% 11.00/1.77 % (1971)dis+1003_1:1_au=on:bd=preordered:fde=none:ixr=off:nwc=10.0:i=1827:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2986ds/1827Mi)
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Instruction limit reached!
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)------------------------------
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Termination reason: Unknown
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Termination phase: Saturation
% 11.10/1.79
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Memory used [KB]: 9978
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Time elapsed: 0.293 s
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)Instructions burned: 996 (million)
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)------------------------------
% 11.10/1.79 % (1962)------------------------------
% 11.10/1.80 % (1972)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:tnu=1:i=70:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2985ds/70Mi)
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Instruction limit reached!
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)------------------------------
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Termination reason: Unknown
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Termination phase: Preprocessing 1
% 11.25/1.82
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Time elapsed: 0.021 s
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)Instructions burned: 73 (million)
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)------------------------------
% 11.25/1.82 % (1972)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.83 % (1973)lrs+10_1:20_bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:fe=axiom:hud=10:ins=1:nm=20:prag=on:sos=on:i=316:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2985ds/316Mi)
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Instruction limit reached!
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Termination reason: Unknown
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Termination phase: Saturation
% 11.33/1.83
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Memory used [KB]: 14456
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Time elapsed: 0.195 s
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)Instructions burned: 668 (million)
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.83 % (1966)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (1970)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 11.33/1.84
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)Memory used [KB]: 7803
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)Time elapsed: 0.095 s
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)Instructions burned: 281 (million)
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.84 % (1970)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.84 % (1974)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=3548551,65536:s2a=on:i=932:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2985ds/932Mi)
% 11.33/1.85 % (1975)lrs+1010_1:128_au=on:bd=preordered:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sos=all:sp=occurrence:i=4714:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2985ds/4714Mi)
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Instruction limit reached!
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Termination reason: Unknown
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Termination phase: Saturation
% 11.33/1.87
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Memory used [KB]: 7803
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Time elapsed: 0.637 s
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)Instructions burned: 1915 (million)
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.87 % (1954)------------------------------
% 11.33/1.88 % (1976)dis+10_1:1_au=on:e2e=on:fde=none:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:i=8250:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2984ds/8250Mi)
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Instruction limit reached!
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)------------------------------
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Termination reason: Unknown
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Termination phase: Saturation
% 11.92/1.92
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Time elapsed: 0.089 s
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)Instructions burned: 316 (million)
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)------------------------------
% 11.92/1.92 % (1973)------------------------------
% 11.92/1.92 % (1977)lrs+1002_1:1_apa=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:flr=on:hud=1:lcm=reverse:prag=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=770:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2984ds/770Mi)
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)------------------------------
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 11.92/1.95
% 11.92/1.95
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)Instructions burned: 63 (million)
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)------------------------------
% 11.92/1.95 % (1977)------------------------------
% 11.92/1.95 % (1978)ott+1010_5:1_av=off:fe=off:ins=1:kws=precedence:sp=reverse_arity:i=794:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2984ds/794Mi)
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Instruction limit reached!
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)------------------------------
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Termination reason: Unknown
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Termination phase: Saturation
% 12.68/2.12
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Memory used [KB]: 10490
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Time elapsed: 0.283 s
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)Instructions burned: 933 (million)
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)------------------------------
% 12.68/2.12 % (1974)------------------------------
% 12.68/2.13 % (1979)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:cond=on:sp=frequency:i=464:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2982ds/464Mi)
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Instruction limit reached!
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)------------------------------
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Termination reason: Unknown
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Termination phase: Saturation
% 14.10/2.22
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Memory used [KB]: 6396
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Time elapsed: 0.261 s
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)Instructions burned: 794 (million)
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)------------------------------
% 14.10/2.22 % (1978)------------------------------
% 14.77/2.22 % (1980)ott+21_1:3_avsq=on:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:tnu=1:i=1376:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2981ds/1376Mi)
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Instruction limit reached!
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)------------------------------
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Termination reason: Unknown
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Termination phase: Saturation
% 14.77/2.28
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Time elapsed: 0.149 s
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)Instructions burned: 464 (million)
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)------------------------------
% 14.77/2.28 % (1979)------------------------------
% 15.24/2.29 % (1981)dis+10_1:1_etr=on:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=906:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2980ds/906Mi)
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Instruction limit reached!
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)------------------------------
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Termination reason: Unknown
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Termination phase: Saturation
% 15.24/2.35
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Memory used [KB]: 11001
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Time elapsed: 0.585 s
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)Instructions burned: 1827 (million)
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)------------------------------
% 15.24/2.35 % (1971)------------------------------
% 15.24/2.36 % (1982)lrs+1002_1:16_bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:kws=precedence:sac=on:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=434:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2980ds/434Mi)
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)------------------------------
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 15.76/2.39
% 15.76/2.39
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)Time elapsed: 0.025 s
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)Instructions burned: 73 (million)
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)------------------------------
% 15.76/2.39 % (1982)------------------------------
% 15.76/2.39 % (1983)lrs+10_5:4_cnfonf=conj_eager:fe=axiom:hflw=5:hfsq=on:hfsqc=10:hfsql=off:hud=10:plsq=on:sgt=5:spb=goal_then_units:ss=axioms:i=865:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2979ds/865Mi)
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Instruction limit reached!
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)------------------------------
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Termination reason: Unknown
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Termination phase: Saturation
% 16.51/2.54
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Memory used [KB]: 11129
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Time elapsed: 1.366 s
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)Instructions burned: 4437 (million)
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)------------------------------
% 16.51/2.54 % (1924)------------------------------
% 16.51/2.55 % (1984)dis+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_simp:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=593:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2978ds/593Mi)
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Instruction limit reached!
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Termination reason: Unknown
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Termination phase: Saturation
% 16.83/2.61
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Memory used [KB]: 9210
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Time elapsed: 0.218 s
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)Instructions burned: 865 (million)
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.61 % (1983)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Instruction limit reached!
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Termination reason: Unknown
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Termination phase: Saturation
% 16.83/2.61
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Memory used [KB]: 11257
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Time elapsed: 0.326 s
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)Instructions burned: 906 (million)
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.61 % (1981)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.62 % (1985)dis+10_1:1_sd=2:sgt=20:slsq=on:ss=axioms:st=6.0:i=443:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2977ds/443Mi)
% 16.83/2.62 % (1986)dis+10_1:1_atotf=0.1:cbe=off:sd=3:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=594:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2977ds/594Mi)
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Instruction limit reached!
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Termination reason: Unknown
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Termination phase: Saturation
% 16.83/2.64
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Memory used [KB]: 14328
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Time elapsed: 0.414 s
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)Instructions burned: 1377 (million)
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.64 % (1980)------------------------------
% 16.83/2.65 % (1987)ott+10_1:1024_anc=none:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fsr=off:hud=10:ixr=off:nm=4:nwc=5.0:spb=goal:i=327:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2977ds/327Mi)
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)------------------------------
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.14/2.71
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Memory used [KB]: 14583
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Time elapsed: 1.387 s
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)Instructions burned: 4352 (million)
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)------------------------------
% 18.14/2.71 % (1955)------------------------------
% 18.70/2.72 % (1988)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=5411:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2976ds/5411Mi)
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)------------------------------
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.70/2.73
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Memory used [KB]: 9338
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Time elapsed: 0.202 s
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)Instructions burned: 596 (million)
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)------------------------------
% 18.70/2.73 % (1984)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.74 % (1989)lrs+10_1:20_au=on:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:ins=1:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=46,31:sac=on:i=1762:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2976ds/1762Mi)
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 18.89/2.74
% 18.89/2.74
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)Time elapsed: 0.024 s
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)Instructions burned: 71 (million)
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.74 % (1988)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.75 % (1990)dis+1003_1:64_cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:hud=9:nwc=8.0:prag=on:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2976ds/96Mi)
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.89/2.75
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Time elapsed: 0.109 s
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)Instructions burned: 329 (million)
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.75 % (1987)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.76 % (1991)lrs+21_1:1_hud=5:kws=inv_frequency:nm=16:nwc=2.0:prag=on:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=503:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2976ds/503Mi)
% 18.89/2.76 % (1985)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.89/2.76 % (1985)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.76 % (1985)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.76 % (1985)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.89/2.76 % (1985)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.89/2.76
% 18.89/2.76 % (1985)Memory used [KB]: 8443
% 18.89/2.77 % (1985)Time elapsed: 0.148 s
% 18.89/2.77 % (1985)Instructions burned: 444 (million)
% 18.89/2.77 % (1985)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.77 % (1985)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.77 % (1992)lrs+1002_1:1024_au=on:cond=fast:ntd=on:piset=and:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=183491,1048576:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=90:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2976ds/90Mi)
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 18.89/2.78
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)Instructions burned: 98 (million)
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.78 % (1990)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.79 % (1993)lrs+10_1:64_hud=5:plsq=on:plsqr=2011171,524288:i=593:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2975ds/593Mi)
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.89/2.79
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Memory used [KB]: 19317
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Time elapsed: 1.562 s
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)Instructions burned: 5208 (million)
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.79 % (1953)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.80 % (1994)dis-1002_1:1_alpa=false:apa=on:au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:er=filter:fde=unused:plsq=on:plsqr=9699663,1048576:s2a=on:sos=on:sp=unary_first:i=1512:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2975ds/1512Mi)
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.89/2.80
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)Instructions burned: 91 (million)
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.80 % (1992)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.81 % (1995)lrs+1002_1:128_cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:ins=1:i=569:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2975ds/569Mi)
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Instruction limit reached!
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Termination reason: Unknown
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Termination phase: Saturation
% 18.89/2.81
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Time elapsed: 0.195 s
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)Instructions burned: 596 (million)
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.81 % (1986)------------------------------
% 18.89/2.82 % (1996)ott+1002_1:1_bd=off:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:fd=off:fe=axiom:hud=5:prag=on:sos=on:i=501:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2975ds/501Mi)
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)------------------------------
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 19.38/2.85
% 19.38/2.85
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)Time elapsed: 0.050 s
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)Instructions burned: 157 (million)
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)------------------------------
% 19.38/2.85 % (1994)------------------------------
% 19.38/2.86 % (1997)lrs+1010_1:3_cnfonf=conj_eager:fsr=off:prag=on:sd=4:sgt=10:ss=axioms:i=562:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2975ds/562Mi)
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Instruction limit reached!
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)------------------------------
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Termination reason: Unknown
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Termination phase: Saturation
% 19.56/2.92
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Time elapsed: 0.164 s
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)Instructions burned: 503 (million)
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)------------------------------
% 19.56/2.92 % (1991)------------------------------
% 19.56/2.93 % (1998)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fde=unused:kws=precedence:tgt=full:i=406:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2974ds/406Mi)
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Instruction limit reached!
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Termination reason: Unknown
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Termination phase: Saturation
% 19.89/2.97
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Memory used [KB]: 8955
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Time elapsed: 0.164 s
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)Instructions burned: 570 (million)
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.97 % (1995)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Instruction limit reached!
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Termination reason: Unknown
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Termination phase: Saturation
% 19.89/2.98
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Time elapsed: 0.193 s
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)Instructions burned: 593 (million)
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.98 % (1993)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.98 % (1999)dis+1004_1:128_au=on:cbe=off:e2e=on:sac=on:i=582:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2973ds/582Mi)
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Instruction limit reached!
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Termination reason: Unknown
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Termination phase: Saturation
% 19.89/2.98
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Memory used [KB]: 8955
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Time elapsed: 0.180 s
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)Instructions burned: 503 (million)
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.98 % (1996)------------------------------
% 19.89/2.99 % (2000)lrs+2_1:1_au=on:bd=off:bsr=unit_only:sd=2:sgt=32:sos=all:ss=axioms:i=456:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2973ds/456Mi)
% 19.89/2.99 % (2001)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:tgt=ground:i=393:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2973ds/393Mi)
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Instruction limit reached!
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)------------------------------
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Termination reason: Unknown
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Termination phase: Saturation
% 20.50/3.03
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Memory used [KB]: 8187
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Time elapsed: 0.177 s
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)Instructions burned: 562 (million)
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)------------------------------
% 20.50/3.03 % (1997)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.04 % (2002)lrs+1010_1:6_au=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:nwc=10.0:pe=on:prag=on:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=1335:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2973ds/1335Mi)
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Instruction limit reached!
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Termination reason: Unknown
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Termination phase: Saturation
% 20.76/3.06
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Time elapsed: 0.132 s
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)Instructions burned: 407 (million)
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.06 % (1998)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.07 % (2003)dis+1010_16:1_acc=model:au=on:avsq=on:cond=fast:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsqr=9267,262144:i=3373:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2973ds/3373Mi)
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Instruction limit reached!
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Termination reason: Unknown
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Termination phase: Saturation
% 20.76/3.10
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Time elapsed: 0.112 s
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)Instructions burned: 393 (million)
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.10 % (2001)------------------------------
% 20.76/3.11 % (2004)dis+10_1:1024_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:spb=goal_then_units:i=474:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2972ds/474Mi)
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Instruction limit reached!
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Termination reason: Unknown
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Termination phase: Saturation
% 21.20/3.13
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Memory used [KB]: 8571
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Time elapsed: 0.145 s
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)Instructions burned: 457 (million)
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.13 % (2000)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.14 % (2005)lrs+1002_1:16_amm=sco:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:nm=60:piset=all_but_not_eq:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=2,1:rawr=on:sp=occurrence:ss=included:st=-1.0:i=157:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2972ds/157Mi)
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Instruction limit reached!
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Termination reason: Unknown
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Termination phase: Saturation
% 21.20/3.17
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Memory used [KB]: 9722
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Time elapsed: 0.196 s
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)Instructions burned: 583 (million)
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.17 % (1999)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Instruction limit reached!
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Termination reason: Unknown
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Termination phase: Saturation
% 21.20/3.18
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Time elapsed: 0.043 s
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)Instructions burned: 157 (million)
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.18 % (2005)------------------------------
% 21.20/3.18 % (2006)dis+1010_1:1_amm=off:cs=on:kws=precedence:nwc=10.0:piset=all:s2a=on:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:spb=goal:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=590:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2971ds/590Mi)
% 21.73/3.19 % (2007)dis+10_1:1024_kws=precedence:prag=on:rawr=on:sos=all:sp=unary_first:i=104:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2971ds/104Mi)
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Instruction limit reached!
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)------------------------------
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Termination reason: Unknown
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Termination phase: Saturation
% 21.73/3.22
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Time elapsed: 0.033 s
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)Instructions burned: 105 (million)
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)------------------------------
% 21.73/3.22 % (2007)------------------------------
% 21.73/3.23 % (2008)lrs+1010_1:10_au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:sp=occurrence:i=414:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2971ds/414Mi)
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Instruction limit reached!
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)------------------------------
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Termination reason: Unknown
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Termination phase: Saturation
% 21.90/3.26
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Time elapsed: 0.151 s
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)Instructions burned: 475 (million)
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)------------------------------
% 21.90/3.26 % (2004)------------------------------
% 21.90/3.26 % (2009)dis+10_1:1_av=off:bsd=on:bsr=unit_only:fd=off:hud=8:nm=16:prag=on:i=715:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2971ds/715Mi)
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Instruction limit reached!
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Termination reason: Unknown
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Termination phase: Saturation
% 23.51/3.32
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Memory used [KB]: 14711
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Time elapsed: 0.575 s
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)Instructions burned: 1764 (million)
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.32 % (1989)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.33 % (2010)dis+21_1:5_au=on:ntd=on:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=961:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2970ds/961Mi)
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Instruction limit reached!
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Termination reason: Unknown
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Termination phase: Saturation
% 23.51/3.33
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Memory used [KB]: 21236
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Time elapsed: 1.485 s
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)Instructions burned: 4716 (million)
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.33 % (1975)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Instruction limit reached!
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Termination reason: Unknown
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Termination phase: Saturation
% 23.51/3.34
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Memory used [KB]: 8443
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Time elapsed: 0.116 s
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)Instructions burned: 414 (million)
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.34 % (2008)------------------------------
% 23.51/3.34 % (2011)lrs-1002_1:128_abs=on:bd=preordered:cbe=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:fe=off:tgt=full:i=1213:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2970ds/1213Mi)
% 23.74/3.35 % (2012)lrs+1002_1:12_bd=off:hud=1:ntd=on:piset=equals:prag=on:i=1979:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2970ds/1979Mi)
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Instruction limit reached!
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)------------------------------
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Termination reason: Unknown
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Termination phase: Saturation
% 23.74/3.37
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Time elapsed: 0.184 s
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)Instructions burned: 592 (million)
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)------------------------------
% 23.74/3.37 % (2006)------------------------------
% 23.74/3.37 % (2013)dis+1002_1:1_amm=off:au=on:bsd=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:sp=unary_frequency:i=481:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2970ds/481Mi)
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Instruction limit reached!
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)------------------------------
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Termination reason: Unknown
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Termination phase: Saturation
% 24.12/3.46
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Memory used [KB]: 9594
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Time elapsed: 0.421 s
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)Instructions burned: 1336 (million)
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)------------------------------
% 24.12/3.46 % (2002)------------------------------
% 24.12/3.47 % (2014)dis+10_8:1_apa=on:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:ss=axioms:i=783:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2969ds/783Mi)
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Instruction limit reached!
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)------------------------------
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Termination reason: Unknown
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Termination phase: Saturation
% 24.31/3.50
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Memory used [KB]: 4733
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Time elapsed: 0.234 s
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)Instructions burned: 716 (million)
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)------------------------------
% 24.31/3.50 % (2009)------------------------------
% 24.31/3.51 % (2015)lrs+1010_1:1_avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:kws=inv_arity:nwc=5.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:i=432:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2968ds/432Mi)
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Instruction limit reached!
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)------------------------------
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Termination reason: Unknown
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Termination phase: Saturation
% 24.31/3.52
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Time elapsed: 0.150 s
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)Instructions burned: 483 (million)
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)------------------------------
% 24.31/3.52 % (2013)------------------------------
% 24.31/3.53 % (2016)lrs+1010_1:1_atotf=0.5:au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:fe=off:nwc=5.0:spb=units:i=1670:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2968ds/1670Mi)
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Instruction limit reached!
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)------------------------------
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Termination reason: Unknown
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Termination phase: Saturation
% 24.76/3.63
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Time elapsed: 0.301 s
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)Instructions burned: 961 (million)
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)------------------------------
% 24.76/3.63 % (2010)------------------------------
% 24.76/3.63 % (2017)dis+2_1:1_au=on:hfaw=0:hfsq=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=90:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2967ds/90Mi)
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Instruction limit reached!
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Termination reason: Unknown
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Termination phase: Saturation
% 25.12/3.64
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Time elapsed: 0.141 s
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)Instructions burned: 433 (million)
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.64 % (2015)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.65 % (2018)dis+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=346:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2967ds/346Mi)
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Instruction limit reached!
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Termination reason: Unknown
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Termination phase: Saturation
% 25.12/3.66
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Time elapsed: 0.028 s
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)Instructions burned: 90 (million)
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.66 % (2017)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.67 % (2019)dis+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=401:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2967ds/401Mi)
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Instruction limit reached!
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Termination reason: Unknown
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Termination phase: Saturation
% 25.12/3.71
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Memory used [KB]: 8187
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Time elapsed: 0.245 s
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)Instructions burned: 783 (million)
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.71 % (2014)------------------------------
% 25.12/3.72 % (2020)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=1:sgt=50:ss=axioms:i=6454:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2966ds/6454Mi)
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Instruction limit reached!
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)------------------------------
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Termination reason: Unknown
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Termination phase: Saturation
% 25.73/3.73
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Memory used [KB]: 9083
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Time elapsed: 0.393 s
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)Instructions burned: 1214 (million)
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)------------------------------
% 25.73/3.73 % (2011)------------------------------
% 25.73/3.74 % (2021)dis+1010_1:1_avsq=on:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=10:kws=arity:prag=on:i=283:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2966ds/283Mi)
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Instruction limit reached!
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)------------------------------
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Termination reason: Unknown
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Termination phase: Saturation
% 25.73/3.76
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Time elapsed: 0.104 s
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)Instructions burned: 347 (million)
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)------------------------------
% 25.73/3.76 % (2018)------------------------------
% 25.73/3.76 % (2022)ott+10_1:1_aac=none:apa=on:au=on:cnfonf=off:ntd=on:nwc=12.0:sos=on:i=865:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2966ds/865Mi)
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Instruction limit reached!
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Termination reason: Unknown
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Termination phase: Saturation
% 26.34/3.78
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Memory used [KB]: 8955
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Time elapsed: 0.118 s
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)Instructions burned: 403 (million)
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.78 % (2019)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.79 % (2023)lrs+1002_3:4_au=on:av=off:cnfonf=off:fd=off:fsr=off:ins=2:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=4528:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2965ds/4528Mi)
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 26.34/3.81
% 26.34/3.81
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)Instructions burned: 61 (million)
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.81 % (2023)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.82 % (2024)dis+1002_1:1_cbe=off:hud=5:nm=4:plsq=on:plsqr=7,1:prag=on:sp=const_max:tnu=1:i=1001:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2965ds/1001Mi)
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Instruction limit reached!
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Termination reason: Unknown
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Termination phase: Saturation
% 26.34/3.84
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Time elapsed: 0.095 s
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)Instructions burned: 284 (million)
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.84 % (2021)------------------------------
% 26.34/3.84 % (2025)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:cond=on:hi=on:i=102:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2965ds/102Mi)
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Instruction limit reached!
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)------------------------------
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Termination reason: Unknown
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 27.81/3.87
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Time elapsed: 0.030 s
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)Instructions burned: 105 (million)
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)------------------------------
% 27.81/3.87 % (2025)------------------------------
% 27.94/3.88 % (2026)ott+1010_3:1_nm=20:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:sp=const_frequency:i=952:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2965ds/952Mi)
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Instruction limit reached!
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)------------------------------
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Termination reason: Unknown
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Termination phase: Saturation
% 28.47/3.96
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Memory used [KB]: 8443
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Time elapsed: 0.610 s
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)Instructions burned: 1980 (million)
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)------------------------------
% 28.47/3.96 % (2012)------------------------------
% 28.47/3.97 % (2027)lrs+1010_1:1024_add=large:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fde=none:nm=30:piset=and:sac=on:uhcvi=on:i=578:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2964ds/578Mi)
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Instruction limit reached!
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)------------------------------
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Termination reason: Unknown
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Termination phase: Saturation
% 28.96/4.04
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Memory used [KB]: 10234
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Time elapsed: 0.504 s
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)Instructions burned: 1671 (million)
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)------------------------------
% 28.96/4.04 % (2016)------------------------------
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Instruction limit reached!
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)------------------------------
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Termination reason: Unknown
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Termination phase: Saturation
% 28.96/4.05
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Memory used [KB]: 11001
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Time elapsed: 0.284 s
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)Instructions burned: 867 (million)
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)------------------------------
% 28.96/4.05 % (2022)------------------------------
% 28.96/4.05 % (2028)dis+1010_1:4_avsq=on:avsqr=16,1:bet=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=643:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2963ds/643Mi)
% 28.96/4.05 % (2029)lrs+1010_1:1_cnfonf=off:ntd=on:nwc=3.0:s2a=on:sp=const_frequency:i=865:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2963ds/865Mi)
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Instruction limit reached!
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Termination reason: Unknown
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Termination phase: Saturation
% 29.23/4.08
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Time elapsed: 0.263 s
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)Instructions burned: 1004 (million)
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.08 % (2024)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.09 % (2030)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:erd=off:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:sos=all:i=1174:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2962ds/1174Mi)
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Instruction limit reached!
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Termination reason: Unknown
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Termination phase: Saturation
% 29.23/4.10
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Memory used [KB]: 10490
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Time elapsed: 1.026 s
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)Instructions burned: 3375 (million)
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.10 % (2003)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.10 % (2031)ott+1010_1:32_apa=on:atotf=0.3:au=on:c=on:cnfonf=off:fe=off:fsr=off:nm=6:piset=or:sac=on:sos=on:i=644:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2962ds/644Mi)
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Instruction limit reached!
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Termination reason: Unknown
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Termination phase: Saturation
% 29.23/4.15
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Memory used [KB]: 9594
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Time elapsed: 0.182 s
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)Instructions burned: 579 (million)
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)------------------------------
% 29.23/4.15 % (2027)------------------------------
% 29.42/4.15 % (2032)lrs+10_1:1_alpa=true:au=on:cs=on:tgt=ground:i=1201:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2962ds/1201Mi)
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Instruction limit reached!
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)------------------------------
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Termination reason: Unknown
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Termination phase: Saturation
% 29.67/4.19
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Memory used [KB]: 9850
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Time elapsed: 0.307 s
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)Instructions burned: 954 (million)
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)------------------------------
% 29.67/4.19 % (2026)------------------------------
% 29.67/4.19 % (2033)lrs+1666_1:64_cnfonf=lazy_simp:hud=5:plsq=on:plsql=on:plsqr=152565,524288:tnu=2:i=1046:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2961ds/1046Mi)
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Instruction limit reached!
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)------------------------------
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Termination reason: Unknown
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Termination phase: Saturation
% 30.08/4.24
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Memory used [KB]: 9594
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Time elapsed: 0.192 s
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)Instructions burned: 643 (million)
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)------------------------------
% 30.08/4.24 % (2028)------------------------------
% 30.32/4.25 % (2034)lrs+1010_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fsr=off:hud=5:kws=arity:nm=32:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=642,29:prag=on:i=222:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2961ds/222Mi)
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Instruction limit reached!
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)------------------------------
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Termination reason: Unknown
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Termination phase: Saturation
% 30.32/4.31
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Time elapsed: 0.062 s
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)Instructions burned: 222 (million)
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)------------------------------
% 30.32/4.31 % (2034)------------------------------
% 30.32/4.32 % (2035)ott+1010_1:4_cbe=off:chr=on:hfsq=on:hfsqr=1,16:hud=3:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tnu=2:i=68:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2960ds/68Mi)
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Instruction limit reached!
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Termination reason: Unknown
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Termination phase: Saturation
% 30.53/4.32
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Memory used [KB]: 11897
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Time elapsed: 0.236 s
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)Instructions burned: 644 (million)
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.32 % (2031)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Instruction limit reached!
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Termination reason: Unknown
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Termination phase: Saturation
% 30.53/4.33
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Memory used [KB]: 9466
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Time elapsed: 0.272 s
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)Instructions burned: 865 (million)
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.33 % (2029)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.33 % (2036)lrs+1010_1:1_chr=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:gs=on:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=5,1:prag=on:rawr=on:i=454:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2960ds/454Mi)
% 30.53/4.33 % (2037)dis+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_simp:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=360:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2960ds/360Mi)
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Instruction limit reached!
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Termination reason: Unknown
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 30.53/4.34
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Memory used [KB]: 2302
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Time elapsed: 0.023 s
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)Instructions burned: 69 (million)
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.34 % (2035)------------------------------
% 30.53/4.35 % (2038)lrs+1002_1:16_amm=sco:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:nm=60:piset=all_but_not_eq:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=2,1:rawr=on:sp=occurrence:ss=included:st=-1.0:i=157:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2960ds/157Mi)
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Instruction limit reached!
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Termination reason: Unknown
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 31.98/4.39
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Memory used [KB]: 2814
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Time elapsed: 0.043 s
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)Instructions burned: 157 (million)
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.39 % (2038)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.40 % (2039)ott+1004_1:24_anc=none:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen:fe=off:piset=not:prag=on:rp=on:i=5061:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2959ds/5061Mi)
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Instruction limit reached!
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Termination reason: Unknown
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Termination phase: Saturation
% 31.98/4.44
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Time elapsed: 0.104 s
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)Instructions burned: 360 (million)
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.44 % (2037)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.44 % (2040)lrs+1002_1:8_av=off:fd=off:hud=5:tnu=1:i=2401:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2959ds/2401Mi)
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Instruction limit reached!
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Termination reason: Unknown
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Termination phase: Saturation
% 31.98/4.45
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Memory used [KB]: 15863
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Time elapsed: 2.567 s
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)Instructions burned: 8250 (million)
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.45 % (1976)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Instruction limit reached!
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Termination reason: Unknown
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Termination phase: Saturation
% 31.98/4.45
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Memory used [KB]: 13304
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Time elapsed: 0.129 s
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)Instructions burned: 454 (million)
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.45 % (2036)------------------------------
% 31.98/4.46 % (2041)dis+10_1:1_av=off:e2e=on:nm=4:s2a=on:i=5798:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2959ds/5798Mi)
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Instruction limit reached!
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)------------------------------
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Termination reason: Unknown
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Termination phase: Saturation
% 32.56/4.46
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Memory used [KB]: 9850
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Time elapsed: 0.372 s
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)Instructions burned: 1174 (million)
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)------------------------------
% 32.56/4.46 % (2030)------------------------------
% 32.56/4.46 % (2042)dis+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=346:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2959ds/346Mi)
% 32.56/4.47 % (2044)lrs+1002_1:1_av=off:bd=off:bet=on:e2e=on:fde=unused:fe=off:plsq=on:prag=on:sos=on:i=1321:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2959ds/1321Mi)
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Instruction limit reached!
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)------------------------------
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Termination reason: Unknown
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Termination phase: Saturation
% 32.66/4.51
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Memory used [KB]: 9850
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Time elapsed: 0.312 s
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)Instructions burned: 1047 (million)
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)------------------------------
% 32.66/4.51 % (2033)------------------------------
% 32.66/4.51 % (2046)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:kws=inv_precedence:nwc=10.0:i=1312:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2958ds/1312Mi)
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Instruction limit reached!
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)------------------------------
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Termination reason: Unknown
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Termination phase: Saturation
% 32.79/4.54
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Memory used [KB]: 10234
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Time elapsed: 0.407 s
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)Instructions burned: 1203 (million)
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)------------------------------
% 32.79/4.54 % (2032)------------------------------
% 32.79/4.55 % (2047)ott+2_8:1_add=large:c=on:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:er=filter:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqr=1,1:ss=axioms:i=672:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2958ds/672Mi)
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Instruction limit reached!
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)------------------------------
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Termination reason: Unknown
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Termination phase: Saturation
% 32.79/4.56
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Memory used [KB]: 8315
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Time elapsed: 0.104 s
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)Instructions burned: 346 (million)
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)------------------------------
% 32.79/4.56 % (2042)------------------------------
% 32.79/4.57 % (2048)dis+10_1:1_au=on:c=on:e2e=on:fsr=off:sos=all:sp=const_frequency:ss=axioms:i=1897:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2957ds/1897Mi)
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Instruction limit reached!
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)------------------------------
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Termination reason: Unknown
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Termination phase: Saturation
% 33.15/4.77
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Memory used [KB]: 8443
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Time elapsed: 0.225 s
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)Instructions burned: 673 (million)
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)------------------------------
% 33.15/4.77 % (2047)------------------------------
% 33.15/4.78 % (2049)lrs+10_1:40_av=off:fde=unused:ntd=on:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsqr=411915,1048576:sp=unary_frequency:tgt=full:i=1202:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2955ds/1202Mi)
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Instruction limit reached!
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)------------------------------
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Termination reason: Unknown
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Termination phase: Saturation
% 33.46/4.87
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Memory used [KB]: 4221
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Time elapsed: 0.398 s
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)Instructions burned: 1323 (million)
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)------------------------------
% 33.46/4.87 % (2044)------------------------------
% 33.46/4.88 % (2050)dis+21_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:hfsq=on:hfsqc=40:hfsqr=8,1:ntd=on:sos=on:sp=occurrence:ss=axioms:i=1493:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2954ds/1493Mi)
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Instruction limit reached!
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)------------------------------
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Termination reason: Unknown
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Termination phase: Saturation
% 36.28/4.93
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Memory used [KB]: 10106
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Time elapsed: 0.413 s
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)Instructions burned: 1313 (million)
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)------------------------------
% 36.28/4.93 % (2046)------------------------------
% 36.28/4.94 % (2051)dis+1010_3:1_av=off:fde=unused:hud=10:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:i=7679:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2954ds/7679Mi)
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Instruction limit reached!
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Termination reason: Unknown
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Termination phase: Saturation
% 37.80/5.15
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Memory used [KB]: 4733
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Time elapsed: 0.371 s
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)Instructions burned: 1202 (million)
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.15 % (2049)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.16 % (2052)lrs+2_1:1024_anc=all:cnfonf=off:cs=on:e2e=on:nm=20:s2at=1.5:slsq=on:slsqr=1,2:spb=goal:i=340:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2952ds/340Mi)
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Instruction limit reached!
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Termination reason: Unknown
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Termination phase: Saturation
% 37.80/5.18
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Memory used [KB]: 11897
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Time elapsed: 0.611 s
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)Instructions burned: 1899 (million)
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.18 % (2048)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.19 % (2053)dis+1002_1:1_acc=model:au=on:nwc=5.0:sd=5:ss=axioms:st=2.5:i=3672:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2951ds/3672Mi)
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Instruction limit reached!
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Termination reason: Unknown
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Termination phase: Saturation
% 37.80/5.20
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Time elapsed: 0.756 s
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)Instructions burned: 2404 (million)
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.20 % (2040)------------------------------
% 37.80/5.21 % (2054)dis-1002_3:1_acc=model:bd=off:bsd=on:bsdmm=1:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:fd=off:fe=off:ntd=on:nwc=10.0:piset=equals:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_max:uhcvi=on:i=1535:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2951ds/1535Mi)
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Instruction limit reached!
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)------------------------------
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Termination reason: Unknown
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Termination phase: Saturation
% 38.29/5.26
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Time elapsed: 0.109 s
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)Instructions burned: 341 (million)
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)------------------------------
% 38.29/5.26 % (2052)------------------------------
% 38.29/5.27 % (2055)dis+10_16:1_hud=1:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sd=1:sgt=64:ss=axioms:i=4637:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2951ds/4637Mi)
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Instruction limit reached!
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)------------------------------
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Termination reason: Unknown
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Termination phase: Saturation
% 38.69/5.35
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Memory used [KB]: 13816
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Time elapsed: 0.479 s
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)Instructions burned: 1495 (million)
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)------------------------------
% 38.69/5.35 % (2050)------------------------------
% 38.69/5.36 % (2056)lrs+10_1:1_fde=unused:prag=on:sd=2:sgt=32:ss=axioms:i=3174:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2950ds/3174Mi)
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Instruction limit reached!
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)------------------------------
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Termination reason: Unknown
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Termination phase: Saturation
% 41.63/5.60
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Memory used [KB]: 12281
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Time elapsed: 1.879 s
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)Instructions burned: 6455 (million)
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)------------------------------
% 41.63/5.60 % (2020)------------------------------
% 41.63/5.61 % (2057)lrs+1010_1:10_au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:sp=occurrence:i=307:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2947ds/307Mi)
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Instruction limit reached!
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)------------------------------
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Termination reason: Unknown
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Termination phase: Saturation
% 42.24/5.67
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Memory used [KB]: 12792
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Time elapsed: 0.468 s
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)Instructions burned: 1535 (million)
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)------------------------------
% 42.24/5.67 % (2054)------------------------------
% 42.30/5.68 % (2058)dis+1002_5:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fs=off:fsr=off:sos=on:i=3619:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2946ds/3619Mi)
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Instruction limit reached!
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)------------------------------
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Termination reason: Unknown
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Termination phase: Saturation
% 42.30/5.70
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Time elapsed: 0.086 s
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)Instructions burned: 307 (million)
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)------------------------------
% 42.30/5.70 % (2057)------------------------------
% 42.58/5.71 % (2059)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:fde=none:ins=1:sp=const_max:i=2325:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2946ds/2325Mi)
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)------------------------------
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 42.58/5.73
% 42.58/5.73
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)Memory used [KB]: 7419
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)Time elapsed: 0.044 s
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)Instructions burned: 139 (million)
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)------------------------------
% 42.58/5.73 % (2058)------------------------------
% 42.70/5.73 % (2060)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:sac=on:sd=5:slsq=on:slsqr=1,4:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=2341:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2946ds/2341Mi)
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Instruction limit reached!
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)------------------------------
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Termination reason: Unknown
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Termination phase: Saturation
% 45.22/6.06
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Memory used [KB]: 28656
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Time elapsed: 1.661 s
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)Instructions burned: 5061 (million)
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)------------------------------
% 45.22/6.06 % (2039)------------------------------
% 45.22/6.07 % (2061)lrs+1010_1:16_apa=on:bsd=on:cnfonf=off:hud=10:sac=on:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=7257:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2943ds/7257Mi)
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Instruction limit reached!
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)------------------------------
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Termination reason: Unknown
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Termination phase: Saturation
% 46.31/6.20
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Memory used [KB]: 13176
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Time elapsed: 1.742 s
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)Instructions burned: 5798 (million)
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)------------------------------
% 46.31/6.20 % (2041)------------------------------
% 46.31/6.21 % (2062)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=3548551,65536:s2a=on:i=3710:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2941ds/3710Mi)
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (2056)------------------------------
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 46.80/6.27
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)Memory used [KB]: 11769
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)Time elapsed: 0.911 s
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)Instructions burned: 2781 (million)
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)------------------------------
% 46.80/6.27 % (2056)------------------------------
% 46.80/6.28 % (2063)lrs+1010_1:1_avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:kws=inv_arity:nwc=5.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:i=326:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2941ds/326Mi)
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Instruction limit reached!
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)------------------------------
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Termination reason: Unknown
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Termination phase: Saturation
% 47.01/6.33
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Memory used [KB]: 11257
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Time elapsed: 1.136 s
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)Instructions burned: 3674 (million)
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)------------------------------
% 47.01/6.33 % (2053)------------------------------
% 47.01/6.33 % (2064)lrs+1010_1:64_au=on:c=on:e2e=on:flr=on:hfsq=on:hfsql=off:hfsqr=4,1:ins=1:ntd=on:sp=occurrence:i=1100:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2940ds/1100Mi)
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Instruction limit reached!
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)------------------------------
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Termination reason: Unknown
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Termination phase: Saturation
% 47.16/6.39
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Memory used [KB]: 7931
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Time elapsed: 0.109 s
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)Instructions burned: 328 (million)
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)------------------------------
% 47.16/6.39 % (2063)------------------------------
% 47.16/6.40 % (2065)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fde=unused:kws=precedence:tgt=full:i=406:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2939ds/406Mi)
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Instruction limit reached!
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)------------------------------
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Termination reason: Unknown
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Termination phase: Saturation
% 47.64/6.44
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Memory used [KB]: 11257
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Time elapsed: 0.737 s
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)Instructions burned: 2325 (million)
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)------------------------------
% 47.64/6.44 % (2059)------------------------------
% 47.64/6.45 % (2066)dis+1010_1:1_aac=none:bd=preordered:e2e=on:fde=none:fe=axiom:nm=16:nwc=10.0:prag=on:i=1871:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2939ds/1871Mi)
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Instruction limit reached!
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)------------------------------
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Termination reason: Unknown
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Termination phase: Saturation
% 47.64/6.46
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Memory used [KB]: 9210
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Time elapsed: 0.732 s
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)Instructions burned: 2343 (million)
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)------------------------------
% 47.64/6.46 % (2060)------------------------------
% 47.64/6.47 % (2067)dis+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:hud=1:nm=3:piset=or:prag=on:s2a=on:sp=const_max:i=1194:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2939ds/1194Mi)
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (2065)------------------------------
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 47.84/6.53
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)Time elapsed: 0.132 s
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)Instructions burned: 402 (million)
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)------------------------------
% 47.84/6.53 % (2065)------------------------------
% 47.84/6.54 % (2068)dis+10_1:1024_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:spb=goal_then_units:i=474:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2938ds/474Mi)
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Instruction limit reached!
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)------------------------------
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Termination reason: Unknown
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Termination phase: Saturation
% 50.09/6.68
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Memory used [KB]: 9978
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Time elapsed: 0.349 s
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)Instructions burned: 1100 (million)
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)------------------------------
% 50.09/6.68 % (2064)------------------------------
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Instruction limit reached!
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)------------------------------
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Termination reason: Unknown
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Termination phase: Saturation
% 50.09/6.69
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Time elapsed: 0.175 s
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)Instructions burned: 475 (million)
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)------------------------------
% 50.09/6.69 % (2068)------------------------------
% 50.09/6.69 % (2069)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:ins=3:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=15142123,262144:sp=reverse_arity:i=3115:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2936ds/3115Mi)
% 50.09/6.70 % (2070)dis+10_1:1024_kws=precedence:prag=on:rawr=on:sos=all:sp=unary_first:i=831:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2936ds/831Mi)
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Instruction limit reached!
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)------------------------------
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Termination reason: Unknown
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Termination phase: Saturation
% 50.65/6.73
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Memory used [KB]: 14711
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Time elapsed: 1.466 s
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)Instructions burned: 4639 (million)
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)------------------------------
% 50.65/6.73 % (2055)------------------------------
% 50.65/6.74 % (2071)dis+1666_14:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:piset=all_but_not_eq:prag=on:sp=const_max:i=1188:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2936ds/1188Mi)
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Instruction limit reached!
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)------------------------------
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Termination reason: Unknown
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Termination phase: Saturation
% 50.94/6.83
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Memory used [KB]: 8699
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Time elapsed: 0.361 s
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)Instructions burned: 1195 (million)
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)------------------------------
% 50.94/6.83 % (2067)------------------------------
% 50.94/6.84 % (2072)ott+1010_1:20_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=axiom:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsqr=32,1:sac=on:sos=all:i=2868:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2935ds/2868Mi)
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Instruction limit reached!
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)------------------------------
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Termination reason: Unknown
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Termination phase: Saturation
% 51.67/6.96
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Memory used [KB]: 8955
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Time elapsed: 0.291 s
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)Instructions burned: 831 (million)
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)------------------------------
% 51.67/6.96 % (2070)------------------------------
% 51.67/6.97 % (2073)dis+10_1:4_atotf=0.1:avsq=on:bsr=unit_only:e2e=on:sd=1:sp=const_max:ss=axioms:i=1516:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2934ds/1516Mi)
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Instruction limit reached!
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)------------------------------
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Termination reason: Unknown
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Termination phase: Saturation
% 52.26/7.05
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Memory used [KB]: 13432
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Time elapsed: 0.604 s
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)Instructions burned: 1872 (million)
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)------------------------------
% 52.26/7.05 % (2066)------------------------------
% 52.26/7.06 % (2074)lrs+1002_1:20_afp=1000:au=on:bsd=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:sp=const_max:i=2321:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2933ds/2321Mi)
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Instruction limit reached!
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)------------------------------
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Termination reason: Unknown
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Termination phase: Saturation
% 52.45/7.11
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Memory used [KB]: 10362
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Time elapsed: 0.396 s
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)Instructions burned: 1189 (million)
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)------------------------------
% 52.45/7.11 % (2071)------------------------------
% 52.45/7.12 % (2075)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:bd=off:bsd=on:ixr=off:sp=const_max:i=2812:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2932ds/2812Mi)
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Instruction limit reached!
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)------------------------------
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Termination reason: Unknown
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Termination phase: Saturation
% 54.86/7.25
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Memory used [KB]: 12920
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Time elapsed: 2.293 s
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)Instructions burned: 7680 (million)
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)------------------------------
% 54.86/7.25 % (2051)------------------------------
% 54.86/7.26 % (2076)dis+1002_8:1_bd=off:sd=1:sgt=16:ss=axioms:i=4604:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2931ds/4604Mi)
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Instruction limit reached!
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)------------------------------
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Termination reason: Unknown
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Termination phase: Saturation
% 55.39/7.36
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Memory used [KB]: 18677
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Time elapsed: 1.156 s
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)Instructions burned: 3711 (million)
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)------------------------------
% 55.39/7.36 % (2062)------------------------------
% 55.77/7.37 % (2077)ott+1002_1:4_c=on:chr=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=10:nm=10:piset=all_but_not_eq:rp=on:spb=goal:uhcvi=on:i=2678:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2929ds/2678Mi)
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Instruction limit reached!
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)------------------------------
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Termination reason: Unknown
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Termination phase: Saturation
% 55.77/7.44
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Memory used [KB]: 10618
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Time elapsed: 0.492 s
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)Instructions burned: 1518 (million)
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)------------------------------
% 55.77/7.44 % (2073)------------------------------
% 56.22/7.45 % (2078)dis+1010_1:4_avsq=on:avsqr=16,1:bet=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=643:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2929ds/643Mi)
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (2074)------------------------------
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 56.70/7.56
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)Memory used [KB]: 12665
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)Time elapsed: 0.519 s
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)Instructions burned: 1698 (million)
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)------------------------------
% 56.70/7.56 % (2074)------------------------------
% 56.70/7.57 % (2079)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:pe=on:i=458:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2928ds/458Mi)
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Instruction limit reached!
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Termination reason: Unknown
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Termination phase: Saturation
% 57.03/7.63
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Memory used [KB]: 14456
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Time elapsed: 0.962 s
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)Instructions burned: 3117 (million)
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.63 % (2069)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.64 % (2080)lrs+1010_1:1_anc=all_dependent:apa=on:au=on:bd=off:c=on:cnfonf=off:ntd=on:i=2546:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2927ds/2546Mi)
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Instruction limit reached!
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Termination reason: Unknown
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Termination phase: Saturation
% 57.03/7.64
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Memory used [KB]: 9594
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Time elapsed: 0.194 s
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)Instructions burned: 644 (million)
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.64 % (2078)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.65 % (2081)dis+21_1:1_acc=model:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:ins=2:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=1432:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2927ds/1432Mi)
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Instruction limit reached!
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Termination reason: Unknown
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Termination phase: Saturation
% 57.03/7.68
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Memory used [KB]: 19061
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Time elapsed: 0.860 s
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)Instructions burned: 2868 (million)
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)------------------------------
% 57.03/7.68 % (2072)------------------------------
% 58.32/7.69 % (2082)dis+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=386:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2926ds/386Mi)
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Instruction limit reached!
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)------------------------------
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Termination reason: Unknown
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Termination phase: Saturation
% 58.32/7.70
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Memory used [KB]: 8571
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Time elapsed: 0.133 s
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)Instructions burned: 460 (million)
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)------------------------------
% 58.32/7.70 % (2079)------------------------------
% 58.32/7.71 % (2083)dis+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_simp:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=360:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2926ds/360Mi)
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Instruction limit reached!
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)------------------------------
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Termination reason: Unknown
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Termination phase: Saturation
% 59.00/7.80
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Memory used [KB]: 8955
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Time elapsed: 0.113 s
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)Instructions burned: 389 (million)
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)------------------------------
% 59.00/7.80 % (2082)------------------------------
% 59.00/7.81 % (2084)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=5446:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2925ds/5446Mi)
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Instruction limit reached!
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)------------------------------
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Termination reason: Unknown
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Termination phase: Saturation
% 59.00/7.81
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Memory used [KB]: 8827
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Time elapsed: 0.106 s
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)Instructions burned: 363 (million)
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)------------------------------
% 59.00/7.81 % (2083)------------------------------
% 59.00/7.82 % (2085)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=2573:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2925ds/2573Mi)
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Instruction limit reached!
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)------------------------------
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Instruction limit reached!
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)------------------------------
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Termination reason: Unknown
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Termination phase: Saturation
% 60.35/8.03
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Memory used [KB]: 12281
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Time elapsed: 0.381 s
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)Instructions burned: 1433 (million)
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)------------------------------
% 60.35/8.03 % (2081)------------------------------
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Termination reason: Unknown
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Termination phase: Saturation
% 60.35/8.03
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Memory used [KB]: 13816
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Time elapsed: 0.913 s
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)Instructions burned: 2812 (million)
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)------------------------------
% 60.35/8.03 % (2075)------------------------------
% 60.35/8.04 % (2086)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:tnu=1:i=2655:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2923ds/2655Mi)
% 60.35/8.04 % (2087)dis+1002_16:1_apa=on:au=on:av=off:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:nm=0:nwc=10.0:i=2781:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2923ds/2781Mi)
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Instruction limit reached!
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)------------------------------
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Termination reason: Unknown
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Termination phase: Saturation
% 61.15/8.15
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Memory used [KB]: 10874
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Time elapsed: 0.785 s
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)Instructions burned: 2678 (million)
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)------------------------------
% 61.15/8.15 % (2077)------------------------------
% 61.15/8.16 % (2088)lrs+1010_1:10_au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:sp=occurrence:i=307:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2922ds/307Mi)
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Instruction limit reached!
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)------------------------------
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Termination reason: Unknown
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Termination phase: Saturation
% 62.60/8.25
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Time elapsed: 0.087 s
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)Instructions burned: 310 (million)
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)------------------------------
% 62.60/8.25 % (2088)------------------------------
% 62.60/8.26 % (2089)lrs+1010_1:1_avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:kws=inv_arity:nwc=5.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:i=1548:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2921ds/1548Mi)
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Instruction limit reached!
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)------------------------------
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Termination reason: Unknown
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Termination phase: Saturation
% 63.69/8.38
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Memory used [KB]: 20596
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Time elapsed: 2.311 s
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)Instructions burned: 7258 (million)
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)------------------------------
% 63.69/8.38 % (2061)------------------------------
% 63.82/8.39 % (2090)lrs+10_1:3_alpa=true:hud=3:ins=1:ntd=on:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:s2a=on:s2agt=10:i=5214:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2919ds/5214Mi)
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Instruction limit reached!
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)------------------------------
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Termination reason: Unknown
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Termination phase: Saturation
% 64.08/8.48
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Memory used [KB]: 12025
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Time elapsed: 0.830 s
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)Instructions burned: 2546 (million)
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)------------------------------
% 64.08/8.48 % (2080)------------------------------
% 64.08/8.48 % (2091)dis+21_1:1_aac=none:bsr=on:nwc=3.0:s2a=on:i=3201:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2918ds/3201Mi)
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Instruction limit reached!
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)------------------------------
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Termination reason: Unknown
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Termination phase: Saturation
% 64.56/8.58
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Memory used [KB]: 16630
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Time elapsed: 0.759 s
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)Instructions burned: 2573 (million)
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)------------------------------
% 64.56/8.58 % (2085)------------------------------
% 64.91/8.59 % (2092)lrs+1010_1:1_chr=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:gs=on:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=5,1:prag=on:rawr=on:i=454:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2917ds/454Mi)
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Instruction limit reached!
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)------------------------------
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Termination reason: Unknown
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Termination phase: Saturation
% 64.91/8.63
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Memory used [KB]: 12665
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Time elapsed: 1.372 s
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)Instructions burned: 4605 (million)
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)------------------------------
% 64.91/8.63 % (2076)------------------------------
% 64.91/8.64 % (2093)lrs+1002_1:32_au=on:ins=2:nm=16:ntd=on:piset=all_but_not_eq:sp=occurrence:i=3049:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2917ds/3049Mi)
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Instruction limit reached!
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)------------------------------
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Termination reason: Unknown
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Termination phase: Saturation
% 65.40/8.72
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Memory used [KB]: 13560
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Time elapsed: 0.133 s
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)Instructions burned: 454 (million)
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)------------------------------
% 65.40/8.72 % (2092)------------------------------
% 65.40/8.73 % (2094)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=preordered:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:kws=inv_precedence:lwlo=on:sd=2:ss=axioms:i=7311:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2916ds/7311Mi)
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Instruction limit reached!
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)------------------------------
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Termination reason: Unknown
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Termination phase: Saturation
% 66.75/8.73
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Memory used [KB]: 11257
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Time elapsed: 0.479 s
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)Instructions burned: 1549 (million)
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)------------------------------
% 66.75/8.73 % (2089)------------------------------
% 66.75/8.74 % (2095)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=6804:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2916ds/6804Mi)
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)------------------------------
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 66.75/8.79
% 66.75/8.79
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)Time elapsed: 0.050 s
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)Instructions burned: 155 (million)
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)------------------------------
% 66.75/8.79 % (2095)------------------------------
% 66.75/8.80 % (2096)dis+1003_1:1_au=on:bd=preordered:fde=none:ixr=off:nwc=10.0:i=1683:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2915ds/1683Mi)
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Instruction limit reached!
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)------------------------------
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Termination reason: Unknown
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Termination phase: Saturation
% 67.40/8.82
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Memory used [KB]: 17142
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Time elapsed: 0.779 s
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)Instructions burned: 2656 (million)
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)------------------------------
% 67.40/8.82 % (2086)------------------------------
% 67.40/8.83 % (2097)lrs+10_8:1_au=on:av=off:bd=off:cs=on:e2e=on:hfsq=on:hfsqc=50:hfsql=off:nm=0:i=4688:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2915ds/4688Mi)
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Instruction limit reached!
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)------------------------------
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Termination reason: Unknown
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Termination phase: Saturation
% 67.84/8.91
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Memory used [KB]: 4861
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Time elapsed: 0.871 s
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)Instructions burned: 2781 (million)
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)------------------------------
% 67.84/8.91 % (2087)------------------------------
% 67.84/8.92 % (2098)dis-1_1:1_amm=off:au=on:cbe=off:spb=intro:i=2207:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2914ds/2207Mi)
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Instruction limit reached!
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)------------------------------
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Termination reason: Unknown
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Termination phase: Saturation
% 71.53/9.34
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Memory used [KB]: 10874
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Time elapsed: 0.538 s
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)Instructions burned: 1684 (million)
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)------------------------------
% 71.53/9.34 % (2096)------------------------------
% 71.53/9.35 % (2099)dis+1010_1:4_atotf=0.2:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fe=off:ins=2:ntd=on:s2a=on:s2at=5.0:sgt=5:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=8216:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2910ds/8216Mi)
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Instruction limit reached!
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)------------------------------
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Termination reason: Unknown
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Termination phase: Saturation
% 72.19/9.45
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Memory used [KB]: 12537
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Time elapsed: 0.976 s
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)Instructions burned: 3202 (million)
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)------------------------------
% 72.19/9.45 % (2091)------------------------------
% 72.19/9.46 % (2100)lrs+1010_1:1_atotf=0.5:au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:fe=off:nwc=5.0:spb=units:i=430:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2909ds/430Mi)
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (2094)------------------------------
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 72.19/9.47
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)Memory used [KB]: 11897
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)Time elapsed: 0.747 s
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)Instructions burned: 2310 (million)
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)------------------------------
% 72.19/9.47 % (2094)------------------------------
% 72.19/9.48 % (2101)lrs+1004_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:gs=on:hud=10:prag=on:tnu=1:i=2012:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2908ds/2012Mi)
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Instruction limit reached!
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)------------------------------
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Termination reason: Unknown
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Termination phase: Saturation
% 72.58/9.49
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Memory used [KB]: 8571
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Time elapsed: 0.848 s
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)Instructions burned: 3050 (million)
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)------------------------------
% 72.58/9.49 % (2093)------------------------------
% 72.58/9.50 % (2102)ott+1010_1:32_apa=on:atotf=0.3:au=on:c=on:cnfonf=off:fe=off:fsr=off:nm=6:piset=or:sac=on:sos=on:i=631:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2908ds/631Mi)
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Instruction limit reached!
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)------------------------------
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Termination reason: Unknown
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Termination phase: Saturation
% 72.92/9.59
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Memory used [KB]: 8059
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Time elapsed: 0.124 s
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)Instructions burned: 432 (million)
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)------------------------------
% 72.92/9.59 % (2100)------------------------------
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Instruction limit reached!
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)------------------------------
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Termination reason: Unknown
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Termination phase: Saturation
% 72.92/9.59
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Memory used [KB]: 19829
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Time elapsed: 1.781 s
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)Instructions burned: 5446 (million)
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)------------------------------
% 72.92/9.59 % (2084)------------------------------
% 72.92/9.59 % (2103)dis+2_1:1_bd=off:e2e=on:hud=1:nm=3:piset=or:prag=on:s2a=on:sp=const_max:i=8785:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2907ds/8785Mi)
% 72.92/9.60 % (2104)lrs-1002_1:128_abs=on:bd=preordered:cbe=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:fe=off:tgt=full:i=739:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2907ds/739Mi)
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Instruction limit reached!
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)------------------------------
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Termination reason: Unknown
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Termination phase: Saturation
% 73.20/9.62
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Memory used [KB]: 11129
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Time elapsed: 0.707 s
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)Instructions burned: 2207 (million)
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)------------------------------
% 73.20/9.62 % (2098)------------------------------
% 73.20/9.63 % (2105)dis+1002_1:1024_fe=off:hud=5:prag=on:i=5473:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2907ds/5473Mi)
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Instruction limit reached!
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)------------------------------
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Termination reason: Unknown
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Termination phase: Saturation
% 73.30/9.71
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Memory used [KB]: 11385
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Time elapsed: 0.216 s
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)Instructions burned: 632 (million)
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)------------------------------
% 73.30/9.71 % (2102)------------------------------
% 73.30/9.72 % (2106)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=43570:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2906ds/43570Mi)
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)------------------------------
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 73.69/9.74
% 73.69/9.74
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)Memory used [KB]: 6908
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)Time elapsed: 0.024 s
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)Instructions burned: 70 (million)
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)------------------------------
% 73.69/9.74 % (2106)------------------------------
% 73.69/9.75 % (2107)dis+1010_2:3_amm=off:fd=preordered:ixr=off:nm=0:pe=on:piset=equals:prag=on:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=8382:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2906ds/8382Mi)
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Instruction limit reached!
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)------------------------------
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Termination reason: Unknown
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Termination phase: Saturation
% 73.85/9.83
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Memory used [KB]: 8571
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Time elapsed: 0.240 s
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)Instructions burned: 739 (million)
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)------------------------------
% 73.85/9.83 % (2104)------------------------------
% 73.85/9.84 % (2108)dis-30_1:1_acc=on:bd=off:fsr=off:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:i=407:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2905ds/407Mi)
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Instruction limit reached!
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)------------------------------
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Termination reason: Unknown
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Termination phase: Saturation
% 76.40/9.97
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Memory used [KB]: 9210
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Time elapsed: 0.132 s
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)Instructions burned: 407 (million)
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)------------------------------
% 76.40/9.97 % (2108)------------------------------
% 76.40/9.98 % (2109)lrs+10_1:50_cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqr=1,32:sos=all:i=2971:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2904ds/2971Mi)
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Instruction limit reached!
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)------------------------------
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Termination reason: Unknown
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Termination phase: Saturation
% 76.40/10.01
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Memory used [KB]: 15607
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Time elapsed: 1.625 s
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)Instructions burned: 5215 (million)
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)------------------------------
% 76.40/10.01 % (2090)------------------------------
% 76.40/10.02 % (2110)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fe=off:piset=or:prag=on:rawr=on:sos=on:updr=off:i=9822:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2903ds/9822Mi)
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Instruction limit reached!
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)------------------------------
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Termination reason: Unknown
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Termination phase: Saturation
% 77.31/10.11
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Memory used [KB]: 20980
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Time elapsed: 0.626 s
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)Instructions burned: 2015 (million)
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)------------------------------
% 77.31/10.11 % (2101)------------------------------
% 77.31/10.11 % (2111)dis+10_5:1_av=off:ntd=on:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:sgt=16:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:i=8425:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2902ds/8425Mi)
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Instruction limit reached!
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)------------------------------
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Termination reason: Unknown
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Termination phase: Saturation
% 78.18/10.30
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Memory used [KB]: 12025
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Time elapsed: 1.479 s
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)Instructions burned: 4688 (million)
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)------------------------------
% 78.18/10.30 % (2097)------------------------------
% 78.18/10.31 % (2112)lrs+30_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cbe=off:cs=on:nm=2:rawr=on:sos=on:i=3107:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2900ds/3107Mi)
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Instruction limit reached!
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)------------------------------
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Termination reason: Unknown
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Termination phase: Saturation
% 83.57/10.86
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Memory used [KB]: 14967
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Time elapsed: 0.883 s
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)Instructions burned: 2971 (million)
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)------------------------------
% 83.57/10.86 % (2109)------------------------------
% 83.57/10.87 % (2113)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=7967:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2895ds/7967Mi)
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Instruction limit reached!
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)------------------------------
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Termination reason: Unknown
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Termination phase: Saturation
% 86.46/11.23
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Memory used [KB]: 8443
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Time elapsed: 1.600 s
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)Instructions burned: 5474 (million)
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)------------------------------
% 86.46/11.23 % (2105)------------------------------
% 86.46/11.24 % (2114)lrs+1010_10:959_abs=on:acc=on:bd=off:ccuc=small_ones:cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=3:ile=on:kws=inv_frequency:nm=2:piset=and:sd=5:sp=frequency:spb=goal_then_units:ss=axioms:st=4.5:i=3629:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2891ds/3629Mi)
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Instruction limit reached!
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)------------------------------
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Termination reason: Unknown
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Termination phase: Saturation
% 86.94/11.32
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Memory used [KB]: 13688
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Time elapsed: 1.029 s
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)Instructions burned: 3109 (million)
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)------------------------------
% 86.94/11.32 % (2112)------------------------------
% 86.94/11.33 % (2115)lrs+1010_1:1024_au=on:fe=axiom:lwlo=on:nm=0:ntd=on:nwc=10.0:spb=non_intro:uhcvi=on:i=939:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2890ds/939Mi)
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Instruction limit reached!
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)------------------------------
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Termination reason: Unknown
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Termination phase: Saturation
% 89.42/11.65
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Memory used [KB]: 11129
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Time elapsed: 0.345 s
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)Instructions burned: 940 (million)
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)------------------------------
% 89.42/11.65 % (2115)------------------------------
% 89.42/11.66 % (2116)dis+1666_14:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:piset=all_but_not_eq:prag=on:sp=const_max:i=1188:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2887ds/1188Mi)
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Instruction limit reached!
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)------------------------------
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Termination reason: Unknown
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Termination phase: Saturation
% 91.60/11.95
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Memory used [KB]: 17654
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Time elapsed: 2.615 s
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)Instructions burned: 8218 (million)
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)------------------------------
% 91.60/11.95 % (2099)------------------------------
% 91.60/11.96 % (2123)dis+21_3:2_avsq=on:cbe=off:e2e=on:flr=on:ile=on:nwc=5.0:piset=or:rawr=on:sp=occurrence:i=3205:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2884ds/3205Mi)
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded% (2113)------------------------------
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)Termination reason: Refutation not found, non-redundant clauses discarded
% 92.32/12.00
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)Memory used [KB]: 18421
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)Time elapsed: 1.151 s
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)Instructions burned: 3819 (million)
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)------------------------------
% 92.32/12.00 % (2113)------------------------------
% 92.32/12.01 % (2125)lrs+1010_1:1_cnfonf=off:ntd=on:nwc=3.0:s2a=on:sp=const_frequency:i=865:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2883ds/865Mi)
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Instruction limit reached!
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)------------------------------
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Termination reason: Unknown
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Termination phase: Saturation
% 93.06/12.04
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Memory used [KB]: 10234
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Time elapsed: 0.402 s
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)Instructions burned: 1190 (million)
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)------------------------------
% 93.06/12.04 % (2116)------------------------------
% 93.06/12.04 % (2126)ott+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:cbe=off:cha=on:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fd=off:fe=off:ntd=on:sp=const_frequency:i=7469:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2883ds/7469Mi)
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Instruction limit reached!
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)------------------------------
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Termination reason: Unknown
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Termination phase: Saturation
% 94.14/12.25
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Memory used [KB]: 15607
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Time elapsed: 2.669 s
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)Instructions burned: 8786 (million)
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)------------------------------
% 94.14/12.25 % (2103)------------------------------
% 94.14/12.26 % (2127)dis+10_1:10_bd=preordered:e2e=on:fde=none:fe=axiom:hud=3:kws=precedence:nwc=3.0:prag=on:sp=const_max:tgt=full:i=4165:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2881ds/4165Mi)
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Instruction limit reached!
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)------------------------------
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Termination reason: Unknown
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Termination phase: Saturation
% 94.75/12.28
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Memory used [KB]: 9338
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Time elapsed: 0.273 s
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)Instructions burned: 867 (million)
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)------------------------------
% 94.75/12.28 % (2125)------------------------------
% 94.75/12.29 % (2128)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:avsq=on:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fsr=off:ntd=on:nwc=10.0:sp=reverse_frequency:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=13468:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2880ds/13468Mi)
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Instruction limit reached!
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)------------------------------
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Termination reason: Unknown
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Termination phase: Saturation
% 95.02/12.40
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Memory used [KB]: 14711
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Time elapsed: 1.182 s
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)Instructions burned: 3630 (million)
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)------------------------------
% 95.02/12.40 % (2114)------------------------------
% 95.02/12.41 % (2129)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:bsr=unit_only:cbe=off:fe=off:fsr=off:nm=10:nwc=6.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sos=all:i=2635:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2879ds/2635Mi)
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Instruction limit reached!
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)------------------------------
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Termination reason: Unknown
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Termination phase: Saturation
% 95.46/12.46
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Memory used [KB]: 25074
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Time elapsed: 2.714 s
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)Instructions burned: 8382 (million)
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)------------------------------
% 95.46/12.46 % (2107)------------------------------
% 95.46/12.47 % (2130)dis+1010_1:4_avsq=on:avsqr=16,1:bet=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=5:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:i=631:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2878ds/631Mi)
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Instruction limit reached!
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)------------------------------
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Termination reason: Unknown
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Termination phase: Saturation
% 97.84/12.66
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Memory used [KB]: 9594
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Time elapsed: 0.192 s
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)Instructions burned: 632 (million)
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)------------------------------
% 97.84/12.66 % (2130)------------------------------
% 97.84/12.67 % (2131)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=15557:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2877ds/15557Mi)
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Instruction limit reached!
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)------------------------------
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Termination reason: Unknown
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Termination phase: Saturation
% 97.84/12.69
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Memory used [KB]: 14200
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Time elapsed: 2.595 s
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)Instructions burned: 8425 (million)
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)------------------------------
% 97.84/12.69 % (2111)------------------------------
% 97.84/12.70 % (2132)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:sac=on:sd=5:slsq=on:slsqr=1,4:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=2142:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2876ds/2142Mi)
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Instruction limit reached!
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)------------------------------
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Termination reason: Unknown
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Termination phase: Saturation
% 99.75/12.96
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Memory used [KB]: 11257
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Time elapsed: 0.993 s
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)Instructions burned: 3207 (million)
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)------------------------------
% 99.75/12.96 % (2123)------------------------------
% 99.75/12.97 % (2133)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:nwc=5.0:sgt=5:sp=reverse_arity:ss=axioms:i=5624:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2874ds/5624Mi)
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Instruction limit reached!
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)------------------------------
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Termination reason: Unknown
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Termination phase: Saturation
% 100.26/13.04
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Memory used [KB]: 20084
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Time elapsed: 3.024 s
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)Instructions burned: 9822 (million)
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)------------------------------
% 100.26/13.04 % (2110)------------------------------
% 100.26/13.05 % (2134)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:pe=on:i=1665:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2873ds/1665Mi)
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Instruction limit reached!
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)------------------------------
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Termination reason: Unknown
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Termination phase: Saturation
% 102.47/13.24
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Memory used [KB]: 12409
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Time elapsed: 0.831 s
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)Instructions burned: 2638 (million)
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)------------------------------
% 102.47/13.24 % (2129)------------------------------
% 102.71/13.24 % (2135)dis+1002_1:1_av=off:prag=on:sd=1:sos=on:sp=occurrence:ss=axioms:i=64912:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2871ds/64912Mi)
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Instruction limit reached!
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)------------------------------
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Termination reason: Unknown
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Termination phase: Saturation
% 103.29/13.38
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Memory used [KB]: 9083
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Time elapsed: 0.682 s
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)Instructions burned: 2142 (million)
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)------------------------------
% 103.29/13.38 % (2132)------------------------------
% 103.67/13.39 % (2136)lrs+10_1:32_atotf=0.1:avsq=on:bsr=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fde=unused:i=7801:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2869ds/7801Mi)
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Instruction limit reached!
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)------------------------------
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Termination reason: Unknown
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Termination phase: Saturation
% 104.67/13.56
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Memory used [KB]: 10234
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Time elapsed: 0.513 s
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)Instructions burned: 1667 (million)
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)------------------------------
% 104.67/13.56 % (2134)------------------------------
% 104.67/13.57 % (2137)ott+2_1:1_au=on:hfsq=on:hfsqc=5:hfsql=off:nwc=5.0:sd=3:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=15194:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2868ds/15194Mi)
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Instruction limit reached!
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)------------------------------
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Termination reason: Unknown
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Termination phase: Saturation
% 105.10/13.65
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Memory used [KB]: 26993
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Time elapsed: 1.386 s
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)Instructions burned: 4166 (million)
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)------------------------------
% 105.10/13.65 % (2127)------------------------------
% 105.10/13.66 % (2138)dis-1002_1:1_alpa=false:apa=on:au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:er=filter:fde=unused:plsq=on:plsqr=9699663,1048576:s2a=on:sos=on:sp=unary_first:i=6753:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2867ds/6753Mi)
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)------------------------------
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 105.35/13.71
% 105.35/13.71
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)Time elapsed: 0.051 s
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)Instructions burned: 156 (million)
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)------------------------------
% 105.35/13.71 % (2138)------------------------------
% 105.35/13.71 % (2139)lrs+1002_1:28_bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:plsq=on:plsqr=1,1:prag=on:i=1003:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2866ds/1003Mi)
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)First to succeed.
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 108.08/13.93 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 108.08/13.93 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_6, type, sigma_measure: ($tType) > $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_7, type, set: ($tType) > $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_8, type, int: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_9, type, finite_Cartesian_vec: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_10, type, n: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_11, type, real: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(type_def_12, type, nat: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_0, type, finite_Cartesian_vec: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_1, type, sigma_measure: ($tType) > $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_2, type, real: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_3, type, set: ($tType) > $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_4, type, nat: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_5, type, int: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_6, type, n: $tType).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_7, type, real_V2090557954_space: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_8, type, ordere890947078_space: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_9, type, type: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_10, type, plus: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_11, type, zero: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_12, type, minus: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_13, type, ring_char_0: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_14, type, group_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_15, type, lattice: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_16, type, finite_finite: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_17, type, monoid_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_18, type, countable: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_19, type, ab_group_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_20, type, semigroup_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_21, type, comm_monoid_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_22, type, ab_semigroup_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_23, type, comm_monoid_diff: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_24, type, semilattice_inf: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_25, type, cancel_semigroup_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_26, type, ordered_ab_group_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_27, type, topological_t2_space: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_28, type, cancel1352612707id_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_29, type, topolo1314133330id_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_30, type, cancel146912293up_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_31, type, linord219039673up_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_32, type, real_V1076094709vector: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_33, type, euclid925273238_space: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_34, type, ordere779506340up_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_35, type, topolo2117631714pology: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_36, type, topolo503727757_space: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_37, type, canoni770627133id_add: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_38, type, real_V55928688vector: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_39, type, ordere236663937imp_le: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_40, type, elemen1026692323pology: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_41, type, ordere516151231imp_le: !>[X0: $tType]:($o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_42, type, borel_is_borel: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X0 > X1) > sigma_measure @ X0 > $o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_43, type, borel_1404511681_borel: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_44, type, complete_completion: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0 > sigma_measure @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_45, type, complete_main_part: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0 > set @ X0 > set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_46, type, minus_minus: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_47, type, plus_plus: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_48, type, zero_zero: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_49, type, if: !>[X0: $tType]:($o > X0 > X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_50, type, inf_inf: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_51, type, lebesgue_lborel: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_52, type, minkow1937162798nt_vec: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:(finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ X0 > finite_Cartesian_vec @ X1 @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_53, type, ord_Least: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_54, type, ord_less_eq: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > X0 > $o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_55, type, collect: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_56, type, image: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X0 > X1) > set @ X0 > set @ X1)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_57, type, vimage: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X0 > X1) > set @ X1 > set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_58, type, sigma_measurable: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0 > sigma_measure @ X1 > set @ (X0 > X1))).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_59, type, sigma_restrict_space: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0 > set @ X0 > sigma_measure @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_60, type, sigma_sets: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0 > set @ set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_61, type, sigma_space: !>[X0: $tType]:(sigma_measure @ X0 > set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_62, type, sigma_vimage_algebra: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:(set @ X0 > (X0 > X1) > sigma_measure @ X1 > sigma_measure @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_63, type, member: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > set @ X0 > $o)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_64, type, r: finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n > set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_65, type, s: set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_66, type, t: finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n > set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_67, type, t2: finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n > set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_68, type, a: finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_88, type, sK1: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:(set @ X0 > (X0 > X1) > (X0 > X1) > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_89, type, sK2: !>[X0: $tType]:(set @ X0 > set @ X0 > X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_90, type, sK3: !>[X0: $tType]:(set @ X0 > X0 > set @ X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_91, type, sK4: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1 > X0) > (X0 > $o) > (X1 > $o) > X1)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_92, type, sK5: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1 > X0) > X0 > set @ X1 > X1)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_93, type, sK6: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X0 > X1) > sigma_measure @ X0 > sigma_measure @ X1 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_94, type, sK7: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X0 > X1) > sigma_measure @ X0 > sigma_measure @ X1 > set @ X1)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_95, type, sK8: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1 > X0) > (X1 > X0) > X1)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_96, type, sK9: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:(set @ X0 > (X0 > X1) > (X1 > $o) > X1)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_97, type, sK10: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1 > X0) > set @ X1 > set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_98, type, sK11: !>[X0: $tType]:(set @ X0 > set @ X0 > X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_99, type, sK12: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:((X1 > X0) > set @ X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(func_def_100, type, ph13: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10862,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 $false),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f4366,f10829,f10854])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10854,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ~spl0_193),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f10853])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10853,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 $false | ~spl0_193),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f10833])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10833,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = $false) | ~spl0_193),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(superposition,[],[f10828,f2168])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2168,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ a))) @ (t2 @ a)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) = $false)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f1570])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1570,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = (~ (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ a))) @ (t2 @ a)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f542])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f542,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = (~ (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ a))) @ (t2 @ a)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f541])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f541,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ~(member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[X0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n] : (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ X0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ a))) @ (t2 @ a)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f399])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f399,negated_conjecture,(
% 108.08/13.93 ~(member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[X6 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n] : (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ X6 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ a))) @ (t2 @ a)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f398])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f398,conjecture,(
% 108.08/13.93 (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[X6 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n] : (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ X6 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ a))) @ (t2 @ a)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10828,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X0))) @ (t2 @ X0)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) ) | ~spl0_193),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f10827])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10827,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 spl0_193 <=> ! [X0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : ($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X0))) @ (t2 @ X0)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))),
% 108.08/13.93 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_193])])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10829,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 spl0_24 | spl0_193),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10811,f10827,f4023])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4023,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 spl0_24 <=> (euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n = $false)),
% 108.08/13.93 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_24])])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10811,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : ((euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n = $false) | ($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X0))) @ (t2 @ X0)) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(superposition,[],[f10773,f1730])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1730,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : set @ X0] : (((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ X1)) = X1) | (euclid925273238_space @ X0 = $false)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f1729])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1729,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : set @ X0] : ((euclid925273238_space @ X0 = $false) | ($true = ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ X1)) = X1))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f1728])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1728,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : set @ X0] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : set @ X0]: ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ Y0)) = Y0)) @ X1)) | (euclid925273238_space @ X0 = $false)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f1727])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1727,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (($true = (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ Y0)) = Y0)))) | (euclid925273238_space @ X0 = $false)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f1472])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1472,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (($true = (euclid925273238_space @ X0 => (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ Y0)) = Y0)))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1202])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1202,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType] : ($true = (euclid925273238_space @ X0 => (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ Y0)) = Y0)))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(closure,[],[f1036])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1036,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (($true = (euclid925273238_space @ X0 => (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ Y0)) = Y0)))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f1035])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1035,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType] : (euclid925273238_space @ X0 => ! [X1 : set @ X0] : ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ X1)) = X1))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f163])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f163,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType] : (euclid925273238_space @ X0 => ! [X24 : set @ X0] : ((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ (complete_completion @ X0 @ lebesgue_lborel @ X0) @ X24)) = X24))),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_162_space__lebesgue__on)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10773,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (sigma_restrict_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n) @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X1))) @ (t2 @ X1)))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f10772,f1886])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1886,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : sigma_measure @ X0,X1 : set @ X0] : (((sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ X2 @ X1)) = (inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ X1 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ X2)))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f1885])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1885,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : sigma_measure @ X0,X1 : set @ X0] : (($true = ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ X1 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ X2)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ X2 @ X1))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f1884])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1884,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : sigma_measure @ X0,X1 : set @ X0] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : sigma_measure @ X0]: ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ X1 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ Y0)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ Y0 @ X1)))) @ X2))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f1883])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1883,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : set @ X0] : (($true = (!! @ sigma_measure @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : sigma_measure @ X0]: ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ X1 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ Y0)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ Y0 @ X1))))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f1882])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1882,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : set @ X0] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : set @ X0]: (!! @ sigma_measure @ X0 @ (^[Y1 : sigma_measure @ X0]: ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ Y0 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ Y1)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ Y1 @ Y0)))))) @ X1))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f1573])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1573,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (($true = (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: (!! @ sigma_measure @ X0 @ (^[Y1 : sigma_measure @ X0]: ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ Y0 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ Y1)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ Y1 @ Y0))))))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1308])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1308,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType] : ($true = (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: (!! @ sigma_measure @ X0 @ (^[Y1 : sigma_measure @ X0]: ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ Y0 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ Y1)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ Y1 @ Y0))))))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(closure,[],[f840])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f840,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (($true = (!! @ set @ X0 @ (^[Y0 : set @ X0]: (!! @ sigma_measure @ X0 @ (^[Y1 : sigma_measure @ X0]: ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ Y0 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ Y1)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ Y1 @ Y0))))))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f839])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f839,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : sigma_measure @ X0,X2 : set @ X0] : ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ X2 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ X1)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f156])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f156,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType,X8 : sigma_measure @ X0,X45 : set @ X0] : ((inf_inf @ set @ X0 @ X45 @ (sigma_space @ X0 @ X8)) = (sigma_space @ X0 @ (sigma_restrict_space @ X0 @ X8 @ X45)))),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_155_space__restrict__space)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10772,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X1))) @ (t2 @ X1)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f10771])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f10771,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = $false) | ($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X1))) @ (t2 @ X1)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f2314,f2475])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2475,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X1) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f2474])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2474,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : ((((^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n]: (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ Y0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f1433])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1433,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = (!! @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n]: (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ Y0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f838])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f838,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = (!! @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n]: (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ Y0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f837])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f837,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X3 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X3) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3__092_060open_062_092_060And_062a_O_AT_Aa_A_092_060in_062_Asets_Alebesgue_092_060close_062)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2314,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X1) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) = $false) | ($true = (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X1))) @ (t2 @ X1)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f2313])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2313,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X1) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) => (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y0 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X1))) @ (t2 @ X1)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f2312])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2312,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : (($true = ((^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n]: ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ Y0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) => (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y1 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ Y0))) @ (t2 @ Y0)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))) @ X1))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(pi_clausification,[],[f1568])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1568,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = (!! @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n]: ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ Y0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) => (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y1 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ Y0))) @ (t2 @ Y0)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f446])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f446,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = (!! @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n @ (^[Y0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n]: ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ Y0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) => (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[Y1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n]: (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ Y1 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ Y0))) @ (t2 @ Y0)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n)))))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f445])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f445,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X0) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) => (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[X1 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n] : (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ X1 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X0))) @ (t2 @ X0)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f3])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f3,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X5 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ int @ n] : ((member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (t2 @ X5) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) => (member @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (inf_inf @ set @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (vimage @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (^[X6 : finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n] : (plus_plus @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ X6 @ (minkow1937162798nt_vec @ n @ real @ X5))) @ (t2 @ X5)) @ (sigma_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))) @ (sigma_sets @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ (complete_completion @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n @ lebesgue_lborel @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n))))),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2__092_060open_062_092_060And_062a_O_AT_Aa_A_092_060in_062_Asets_Alebesgue_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_A_I_092_060lambda_062x_O_Ax_A_L_Aof__int__vec_Aa_J_A_N_096_AT_Aa_A_092_060inter_062_Aspace_Alebesgue_A_092_060in_062_Asets_Alebesgue_092_060close_062)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4366,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f4365])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4365,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 $false | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f4364])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4364,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ($true = $false) | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f1465,f4300])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4300,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ real = $false) | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f4299])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4299,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ real = $false) | ($true = $false) | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f4298,f1425])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1425,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (finite_finite @ n = $true)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f976])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f976,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (finite_finite @ n = $true)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f975])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f975,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 finite_finite @ n),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f397])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f397,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 finite_finite @ n),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_0)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4298,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ real = $false) | (finite_finite @ n = $false) | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f4296])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4296,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ real = $false) | (finite_finite @ n = $false) | ($true = $false) | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(superposition,[],[f2660,f4025])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f4025,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ real @ n = $false) | ~spl0_24),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f4023])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2660,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType] : (($true = euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X1 @ X0) | (finite_finite @ X0 = $false) | (euclid925273238_space @ X1 = $false)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f2659])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f2659,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType] : (((euclid925273238_space @ X1 & finite_finite @ X0) = $false) | ($true = euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X1 @ X0)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f1435])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1435,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType] : (($true = ((euclid925273238_space @ X1 & finite_finite @ X0) => euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X1 @ X0))) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1377])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1377,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType] : ($true = ((euclid925273238_space @ X1 & finite_finite @ X0) => euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X1 @ X0))),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f1287])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1287,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType] : (((euclid925273238_space @ X0 & finite_finite @ X1) => euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X0 @ X1) = $true)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(closure,[],[f490])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f490,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType] : ((((euclid925273238_space @ X0 & finite_finite @ X1) => euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X0 @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f489])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f489,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType] : ((finite_finite @ X1 & euclid925273238_space @ X0) => euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X0 @ X1)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f372])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f372,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 ! [X65 : $tType,X66 : $tType] : ((finite_finite @ X66 & euclid925273238_space @ X65) => euclid925273238_space @ finite_Cartesian_vec @ X65 @ X66)),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tcon_Finite__Cartesian__Product_Ovec___Euclidean__Space_Oeuclidean__space_81)).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1465,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ real = $true)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1004])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1004,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 (euclid925273238_space @ real = $true)),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f1003])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f1003,plain,(
% 108.08/13.93 euclid925273238_space @ real),
% 108.08/13.93 inference(rectify,[],[f343])).
% 108.08/13.93 thf(f343,axiom,(
% 108.08/13.93 euclid925273238_space @ real),
% 108.08/13.93 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tcon_Real_Oreal___Euclidean__Space_Oeuclidean__space)).
% 108.08/13.93 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)------------------------------
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)Termination reason: Refutation
% 108.08/13.93
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)Memory used [KB]: 13560
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)Time elapsed: 1.637 s
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)Instructions burned: 5206 (million)
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)------------------------------
% 108.08/13.93 % (2128)------------------------------
% 108.08/13.93 % (1533)Success in time 13.562 s
% 108.08/13.93 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------