TSTP Solution File: ITP019_2 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : ITP019_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:33:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 59 ( 59 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 0 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 7 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 0 ?; 2 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(35,axiom,
inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum(fo__c_2Enum_2E0) = c_2Enum_2E0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',stp_eq_fo_c_2Enum_2E0) ).
tff(52,axiom,
! [X: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(X))) != surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum(fo__c_2Enum_2E0))) )
| ( X = surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum(fo__c_2Enum_2E0))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).
tff(53,plain,
! [X: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(X))) != surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)) )
| ( X = surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)) ) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[52,35,theory(equality)]) ).
tff(56,negated_conjecture,
'SKOLEMAAAV4.tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal' != surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum(fo__c_2Enum_2E0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).
tff(57,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAV4.tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal' != surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,35,theory(equality)]) ).
tff(58,negated_conjecture,
surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal('SKOLEMAAAV4.tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal'))) = surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum(fo__c_2Enum_2E0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).
tff(59,plain,
surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal('SKOLEMAAAV4.tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal'))) = surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal(ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[58,35,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(202,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[53,59,57]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : ITP019_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 11:46:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.48 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48 *
% 0.20/0.49 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 "."
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-03T11:46:56
% 0.20/0.49 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-06-03T11:46:56
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 #||
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.58 ||#
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.58 ; 350 formulas have been input or derived (from 51 formulas).
% 0.20/0.58 ; 202 (58%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.58 ; 8 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.58 ; 194 (96%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.58 ;
% 0.20/0.58 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.014 15% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.002 2% Assert (45 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.024 26% Process new row (323 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.016 17% Resolution (100 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.001 1% Paramodulation (50 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (1 call)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.001 1% Condensing (80 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.005 5% Forward subsumption (80 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.001 1% Backward subsumption (77 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (7 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.001 1% Forward simplification (319 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.001 1% Backward simplification (198 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.001 1% Ordering (237 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (309 calls)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.026 28% Other
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.093 Total
% 0.20/0.58 ; 0.095 Real time
% 0.20/0.58 ;
% 0.20/0.58 ; Term-hash-array has 494 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.58 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 75 entries (75 at peak, 77 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.20/0.58 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 635 nodes (635 at peak, 659 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.20/0.58 ; Retrieved 16 possibly forward subsuming rows in 80 calls.
% 0.20/0.58 ; Retrieved 2 possibly backward subsumed rows in 77 calls.
% 0.20/0.58 ; Path-index has 505 entries (505 at peak, 511 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.20/0.58 ; Path-index has 1,395 nodes (1,395 at peak, 1,405 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.20/0.58 ; Trie-index has 505 entries (505 at peak, 511 added, 6 deleted).
% 0.20/0.58 ; Trie-index has 1,809 nodes (1,809 at peak, 1,837 added, 28 deleted).
% 0.20/0.58 ; Retrieved 153 generalization terms in 917 calls.
% 0.20/0.58 ; Retrieved 120 instance terms in 120 calls.
% 0.20/0.58 ; Retrieved 10,318 unifiable terms in 1,137 calls.
% 0.20/0.58 ;
% 0.20/0.58 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.20/0.58 ; 1 with value 10 1 with value 15 1 with value 22
% 0.20/0.58 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 7 entries:
% 0.20/0.58 ; 3 with value 23 1 with value 25 1 with value 34
% 0.20/0.58 ; 1 with value 24 1 with value 26
% 0.20/0.58 ; The agenda of rows to give has 138 entries:
% 0.20/0.58 ; 3 with value (4 7) 5 with value (4 16) 3 with value (4 23)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 2 with value (4 8) 7 with value (4 17) 3 with value (4 24)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 17 with value (4 10) 18 with value (4 18) 5 with value (4 25)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 7 with value (4 11) 10 with value (4 19) 5 with value (4 26)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 19 with value (4 12) 7 with value (4 20) 1 with value (4 27)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 6 with value (4 13) 3 with value (4 21) 1 with value (4 31)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 7 with value (4 14) 4 with value (4 22) 2 with value (4 32)
% 0.20/0.58 ; 3 with value (4 15)
% 0.20/0.58 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.58 0.095 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.58 0.083867 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.58 0.010838 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.58 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.58 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.58 4,884,264 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.58 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.58 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-03T11:46:56
% 0.20/0.58 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.58 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------