TSTP Solution File: ITP019+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : ITP019+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:34:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.00s 5.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 8 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1578,plain,
( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1)) = X1
| ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v08mic90/lgb.p',i_0_1578) ).
cnf(i_0_1584,negated_conjecture,
mem(esk183_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v08mic90/lgb.p',i_0_1584) ).
cnf(i_0_1582,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk183_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v08mic90/lgb.p',i_0_1582) ).
cnf(i_0_1574,plain,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v08mic90/lgb.p',i_0_1574) ).
cnf(i_0_1583,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != esk183_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-v08mic90/lgb.p',i_0_1583) ).
cnf(c_0_1590,plain,
( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1)) = X1
| ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
i_0_1578 ).
cnf(c_0_1591,negated_conjecture,
mem(esk183_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
i_0_1584 ).
cnf(c_0_1592,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk183_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
i_0_1582 ).
cnf(c_0_1593,plain,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
i_0_1574 ).
cnf(c_0_1594,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != esk183_0,
i_0_1583 ).
cnf(c_0_1595,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1590,c_0_1591]),c_0_1592]),c_0_1593]),c_0_1594]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : ITP019+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 02:01:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.26/1.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.26/1.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.26/1.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 12.00/5.86 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 12.00/5.86 # No SInE strategy applied
% 12.00/5.86 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 12.00/5.86 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___100_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 12.00/5.86 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 12.00/5.86 #
% 12.00/5.86 # Preprocessing time : 0.042 s
% 12.00/5.86
% 12.00/5.86 # Proof found!
% 12.00/5.86 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.00/5.86 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.00/5.86 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.00/5.86
% 12.00/5.86 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.00/5.86 # User time : 0.059 s
% 12.00/5.86 # System time : 0.007 s
% 12.00/5.86 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 12.00/5.86 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 12.00/5.86
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------