TSTP Solution File: ITP019+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : ITP019+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:19:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 5.99s 4.14s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
! [X75] :
( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
=> s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV,axiom,
! [X75] : s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV) ).
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0,axiom,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X75] :
( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
=> s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X14943] : s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X14943))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X14943),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
& s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X1))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.08 % Problem : ITP019+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.29 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.29 % DateTime : Sat May 18 18:47:54 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.99/4.14 # Version: 3.1.0
% 5.99/4.14 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.99/4.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 891s (3) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 891s (3) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting sh5l with 297s (1) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 297s (1) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # new_bool_1 with pid 23095 completed with status 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 5.99/4.14 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.99/4.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 891s (3) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 891s (3) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.99/4.14 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 5.99/4.14 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 891 seconds (891 total)
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 446s (1) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 112s (1) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 112s (1) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23101 completed with status 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 5.99/4.14 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.99/4.14 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 297 seconds (2376 total)
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_3 with 891s (3) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting new_bool_1 with 891s (3) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.99/4.14 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 5.99/4.14 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 891 seconds (891 total)
% 5.99/4.14 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 446s (1) cores
% 5.99/4.14 # Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 5.99/4.14 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.99/4.14
% 5.99/4.14 # Proof found!
% 5.99/4.14 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.99/4.14 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.99/4.14 # Parsed axioms : 23399
% 5.99/4.14 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 22862
% 5.99/4.14 # Initial clauses : 1549
% 5.99/4.14 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 865
% 5.99/4.14 # Initial clauses in saturation : 684
% 5.99/4.14 # Processed clauses : 699
% 5.99/4.14 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 5.99/4.14 # ...subsumed : 302
% 5.99/4.14 # ...remaining for further processing : 391
% 5.99/4.14 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 5.99/4.14 # Generated clauses : 13
% 5.99/4.14 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 5.99/4.14 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Paramodulations : 13
% 5.99/4.14 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # NegExts : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Total rewrite steps : 51
% 5.99/4.14 # ...of those cached : 27
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional check models : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.99/4.14 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.99/4.14 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.99/4.14 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.99/4.14 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.99/4.14 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 5.99/4.14 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 5.99/4.14 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 5.99/4.14 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 5.99/4.14 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 364
% 5.99/4.14 # ...number of literals in the above : 882
% 5.99/4.14 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Current number of archived clauses : 380
% 5.99/4.14 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45220
% 5.99/4.14 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27205
% 5.99/4.14 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 299
% 5.99/4.14 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # BW rewrite match attempts : 330
% 5.99/4.14 # BW rewrite match successes : 39
% 5.99/4.14 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.99/4.14 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1501739
% 5.99/4.14 # Search garbage collected termcells : 375228
% 5.99/4.14
% 5.99/4.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.99/4.14 # User time : 0.409 s
% 5.99/4.14 # System time : 0.084 s
% 5.99/4.14 # Total time : 0.493 s
% 5.99/4.14 # Maximum resident set size: 68864 pages
% 5.99/4.14
% 5.99/4.14 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.99/4.14 # User time : 3.785 s
% 5.99/4.14 # System time : 0.200 s
% 5.99/4.14 # Total time : 3.985 s
% 5.99/4.14 # Maximum resident set size: 59220 pages
% 5.99/4.14 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------