TSTP Solution File: ITP019+4 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ITP019+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:06:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 17.84s 16.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 17.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 13 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
! [X75] :
( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
=> s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7mzpQnqn9R/E---3.1_32657.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV,axiom,
! [X75] : s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7mzpQnqn9R/E---3.1_32657.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV) ).
fof(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0,axiom,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7mzpQnqn9R/E---3.1_32657.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X75] :
( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
=> s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X75))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X14943] : s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X14943))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X14943),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
& s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X1))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),esk1_0) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 3.39/3.43 % Problem : ITP019+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 3.39/3.45 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 3.46/3.66 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 3.46/3.66 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 3.46/3.66 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 3.46/3.66 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 3.46/3.66 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 3.46/3.66 % CPULimit : 300
% 3.46/3.66 % WCLimit : 300
% 3.46/3.66 % DateTime : Fri May 3 12:43:40 EDT 2024
% 3.46/3.66 % CPUTime :
% 13.89/14.06 Running first-order theorem proving
% 13.89/14.06 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7mzpQnqn9R/E---3.1_32657.p
% 17.84/16.84 # Version: 3.1.0
% 17.84/16.84 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 17.84/16.84 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 894s (3) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_1 with 894s (3) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 298s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # new_bool_1 with pid 990 completed with status 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 17.84/16.84 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 17.84/16.84 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 894s (3) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_1 with 894s (3) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 17.84/16.84 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 17.84/16.84 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 894 seconds (894 total)
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 447s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 112s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 112s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 996 completed with status 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 17.84/16.84 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 17.84/16.84 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_3 with 894s (3) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting new_bool_1 with 894s (3) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 17.84/16.84 # Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 17.84/16.84 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 894 seconds (894 total)
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 447s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 112s (1) cores
% 17.84/16.84 # Preprocessing time : 0.039 s
% 17.84/16.84 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 17.84/16.84
% 17.84/16.84 # Proof found!
% 17.84/16.84 # SZS status Theorem
% 17.84/16.84 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 17.84/16.84 # Parsed axioms : 23399
% 17.84/16.84 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 22862
% 17.84/16.84 # Initial clauses : 1549
% 17.84/16.84 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 865
% 17.84/16.84 # Initial clauses in saturation : 684
% 17.84/16.84 # Processed clauses : 699
% 17.84/16.84 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 17.84/16.84 # ...subsumed : 302
% 17.84/16.84 # ...remaining for further processing : 391
% 17.84/16.84 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 17.84/16.84 # Generated clauses : 13
% 17.84/16.84 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 17.84/16.84 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Paramodulations : 13
% 17.84/16.84 # Factorizations : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # NegExts : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Total rewrite steps : 51
% 17.84/16.84 # ...of those cached : 27
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional check models : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 17.84/16.84 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 17.84/16.84 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 17.84/16.84 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 17.84/16.84 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 17.84/16.84 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 17.84/16.84 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 17.84/16.84 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 17.84/16.84 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 17.84/16.84 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 364
% 17.84/16.84 # ...number of literals in the above : 882
% 17.84/16.84 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Current number of archived clauses : 380
% 17.84/16.84 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45220
% 17.84/16.84 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27205
% 17.84/16.84 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 299
% 17.84/16.84 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # BW rewrite match attempts : 330
% 17.84/16.84 # BW rewrite match successes : 39
% 17.84/16.84 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Condensation successes : 0
% 17.84/16.84 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1501739
% 17.84/16.84 # Search garbage collected termcells : 375228
% 17.84/16.84
% 17.84/16.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 17.84/16.84 # User time : 0.434 s
% 17.84/16.84 # System time : 0.089 s
% 17.84/16.84 # Total time : 0.523 s
% 17.84/16.84 # Maximum resident set size: 68916 pages
% 17.84/16.84
% 17.84/16.84 # -------------------------------------------------
% 17.84/16.84 # User time : 2.815 s
% 17.84/16.84 # System time : 0.214 s
% 17.84/16.84 # Total time : 3.029 s
% 17.84/16.84 # Maximum resident set size: 59256 pages
% 17.84/16.84 % E---3.1 exiting
% 17.84/16.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------