TSTP Solution File: ITP019+2 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.10
% Problem  : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  7 10:35:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 123.14s 23.39s
% Output   : Refutation 123.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   7 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  25 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  150 (  18   ~;   8   |;   1   &; 112   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(mem_type,type,
    mem: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(ty_2Epair_2Eprod_type,type,
    ty_2Epair_2Eprod: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_type,type,
    ty_2Erealax_2Ereal: $i ).

thf(ap_type,type,
    ap: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_type,type,
    c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num: $i ).

thf(c_2Enum_2E0_type,type,
    c_2Enum_2E0: $i ).

thf(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_type,type,
    c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv: $i ).

thf(sk1_type,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
     => ( ( A
         != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
       => ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
         != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
       => ( ( A
           != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
         => ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
           != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
       => ( ( A
           != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
         => ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
           != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ sk1 )
    = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[35]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ sk1 )
    = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

thf(34,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
     => ( ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
          = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
      <=> ( A
          = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).

thf(114,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
     => ( ( ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
            = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
         => ( A
            = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) )
        & ( ( A
            = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
         => ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
            = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(115,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
      | ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
       != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[114]) ).

thf(117,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A )
       != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
      | ( A
        = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
      | ~ ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[115]) ).

thf(34438,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
        = ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
      | ~ ( mem @ A @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) )
      | ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ sk1 )
       != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ A ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[39,117]) ).

thf(34439,plain,
    ( ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 )
      = sk1 )
    | ~ ( mem @ sk1 @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[34438:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    mem @ sk1 @ ( ty_2Epair_2Eprod @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[35]) ).

thf(48528,plain,
    ( ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 )
      = sk1 )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[34439,38]) ).

thf(48529,plain,
    ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 )
    = sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[48528]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ( sk1
   != ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[35]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ( ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 )
   != sk1 ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(48530,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[48529,40]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Mon May  6 22:16:09 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.92/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.19/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (130ms). 
% 1.34/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.74/1.19  % [INFO] 	 nitpick registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.96/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 32 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.96/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 32 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.16/1.35  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.16/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.33/1.36  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 123.14/23.38  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 123.14/23.39  % Time passed: 22860ms (effective reasoning time: 22394ms)
% 123.14/23.39  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 123.14/23.39  % Axioms used in derivation (1): conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0
% 123.14/23.39  % No. of inferences in proof: 17
% 123.14/23.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 22860 ms resp. 22394 ms w/o parsing
% 123.14/23.42  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 123.14/23.42  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------