TSTP Solution File: ITP019+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:34:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.03s 2.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 8 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( X1 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knz1ja_i/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_29,negated_conjecture,
mem(esk3_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knz1ja_i/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != esk3_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knz1ja_i/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk3_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-knz1ja_i/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( X1 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
mem(esk3_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) != esk3_0,
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk3_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : ITP019+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 11:41:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.03/2.37 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 8.03/2.37 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.03/2.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 8.03/2.37
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof found!
% 8.03/2.37 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.03/2.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 8.03/2.37 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 8.03/2.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.03/2.37 # Parsed axioms : 45
% 8.03/2.37 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Initial clauses : 45
% 8.03/2.37 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Initial clauses in saturation : 45
% 8.03/2.37 # Processed clauses : 46
% 8.03/2.37 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 8.03/2.37 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 8.03/2.37 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Generated clauses : 51
% 8.03/2.37 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 41
% 8.03/2.37 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Paramodulations : 47
% 8.03/2.37 # Factorizations : 2
% 8.03/2.37 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 8.03/2.37 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 8.03/2.37 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 8.03/2.37 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 8.03/2.37 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 8.03/2.37 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
% 8.03/2.37 # ...number of literals in the above : 146
% 8.03/2.37 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 124
% 8.03/2.37 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 8.03/2.37 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 8.03/2.37 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.03/2.37 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2070
% 8.03/2.37
% 8.03/2.37 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.03/2.37 # User time : 0.008 s
% 8.03/2.37 # System time : 0.003 s
% 8.03/2.37 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 8.03/2.37 # ...preprocessing : 0.009 s
% 8.03/2.37 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 8.03/2.37 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 8.03/2.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------