TSTP Solution File: ITP018+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : ITP018+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:34:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.92s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 7 equ; 34 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(esk2_0,esk3_0),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate(esk2_0,esk3_0),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))))) != ap(c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg,ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(X1,X2),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate(X1,X2),X3)) = ap(c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg,ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1)
| ~ mem(X3,ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
ne(esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
ne(esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(X1,X2),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(X1,X2),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)))) = ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp(X1,X2),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( mem(ap(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ mem(X2,X4)
| ~ mem(X1,arr(X4,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
( mem(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(X1,X2),arr(ty_2Ebool_2Eitself(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2)))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( mem(c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(X1),ty_2Ebool_2Eitself(X1))
| ~ ne(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( ne(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-sve0w07m/input.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(esk2_0,esk3_0),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate(esk2_0,esk3_0),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))))) != ap(c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg,ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0)))),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(X1,X2),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate(X1,X2),X3)) = ap(c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg,ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(X1,X2),X3))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1)
| ~ mem(X3,ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
ne(esk3_0),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
ne(esk2_0),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
( ap(c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg,ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(esk2_0,esk3_0),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))))) != ap(c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg,ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))))
| ~ mem(ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))),ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real(X1,X2),ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(X1,X2),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)))) = ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp(X1,X2),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( mem(ap(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ mem(X2,X4)
| ~ mem(X1,arr(X4,X3)) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( mem(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(X1,X2),arr(ty_2Ebool_2Eitself(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2)))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
~ mem(ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(esk2_0,esk3_0),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))),ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( mem(ap(c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min(X1,X2),X3),ty_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2))
| ~ mem(X3,ty_2Ebool_2Eitself(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
~ mem(c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0)),ty_2Ebool_2Eitself(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_46]),c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( mem(c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value(X1),ty_2Ebool_2Eitself(X1))
| ~ ne(X1) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
~ ne(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ne(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2))
| ~ ne(X2)
| ~ ne(X1) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_46]),c_0_47])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : ITP018+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 13:01:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.92/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.92/2.39 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.92/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 7.92/2.39
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof found!
% 7.92/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.92/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object total steps : 24
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 7.92/2.39 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 12
% 7.92/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.92/2.39 # Parsed axioms : 34
% 7.92/2.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Initial clauses : 34
% 7.92/2.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 7.92/2.39 # Processed clauses : 63
% 7.92/2.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 63
% 7.92/2.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 7.92/2.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Generated clauses : 82
% 7.92/2.39 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 77
% 7.92/2.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 7.92/2.39 # Paramodulations : 78
% 7.92/2.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 7.92/2.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 62
% 7.92/2.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 7.92/2.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 7.92/2.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 50
% 7.92/2.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48
% 7.92/2.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 253
% 7.92/2.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 425
% 7.92/2.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 175
% 7.92/2.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 7.92/2.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 7.92/2.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.92/2.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3521
% 7.92/2.39
% 7.92/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.92/2.39 # User time : 0.030 s
% 7.92/2.39 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.92/2.39 # Total time : 0.035 s
% 7.92/2.39 # ...preprocessing : 0.029 s
% 7.92/2.39 # ...main loop : 0.006 s
% 7.92/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.92/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------