TSTP Solution File: ITP015_4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP015_4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:06:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 90.57s 68.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 90.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  19 unt;  20 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   5 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  10   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn  19   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    d: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    u: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort3,type,
    du: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort4,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort5,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint: $tType ).

tff(decl_22,type,
    tyop_2Emin_2Ebool: d ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    s: ( d * u ) > du ).

tff(decl_207,type,
    tyop_2Enum_2Enum: d ).

tff(decl_228,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0: mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum ).

tff(decl_249,type,
    i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum: mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum > u ).

tff(decl_2785,type,
    tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart: ( d * d ) > d ).

tff(decl_5198,type,
    tyop_2Einteger_2Eint: d ).

tff(decl_5339,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1: mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_5382,type,
    i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > u ).

tff(decl_5404,type,
    j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint: du > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_5841,type,
    c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1: du > u ).

tff(decl_5886,type,
    c_2Ewords_2Eword__2comp_2E1: du > u ).

tff(decl_8330,type,
    c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1: du > u ).

tff(decl_8348,type,
    c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1: du > u ).

tff(decl_8404,type,
    esk1_0: d ).

tff(ij_2Emono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,axiom,
    ! [X33672: u] : ( s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X33672)))) = s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X33672) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lkVoIK8Ecv/E---3.1_22265.p',ij_2Emono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger__word_2Eword__0__w2i,axiom,
    ! [X1: d] : ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))))) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lkVoIK8Ecv/E---3.1_22265.p',thm_2Einteger__word_2Eword__0__w2i) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w__0,conjecture,
    ! [X1: d] : ( s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lkVoIK8Ecv/E---3.1_22265.p',thm_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w__0) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w__w2i,axiom,
    ! [X1: d,X25780: u] : ( s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),X25780))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),X25780) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lkVoIK8Ecv/E---3.1_22265.p',thm_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w__w2i) ).

tff(thm_2Ewords_2EWORD__NEG__0,axiom,
    ! [X1: d] : ( s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2Eword__2comp_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lkVoIK8Ecv/E---3.1_22265.p',thm_2Ewords_2EWORD__NEG__0) ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X47678: u] : ( s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X47678)))) = s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X47678) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ij_2Emono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint]) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X47245: d] : ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X47245),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))))) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger__word_2Eword__0__w2i]) ).

tff(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: d] : ( s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w__0]) ).

tff(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X45230: d,X45231: u] : ( s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X45230),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X45230),X45231))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X45230),X45231) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w__w2i]) ).

tff(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X46720: d] : ( s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X46720),c_2Ewords_2Eword__2comp_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X46720),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X46720),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ewords_2EWORD__NEG__0]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3: u] : s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X3)))) = s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1: d] : j_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))))) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

tff(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,esk1_0),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) != s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,esk1_0),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: d,X3: u] : s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),X3))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: d] : s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2Eword__2comp_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: d] : s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,c_2Einteger__word_2Ew2i_2E1(s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))))) = s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,esk1_0),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) != s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,esk1_0),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

tcf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: d] : s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Einteger__word_2Ei2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Einteger_2Eint,i_mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__of__num_2E1(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Efcp_2Ecart(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,X1),c_2Ewords_2En2w_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,i_mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum(mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 6.07/6.13  % Problem    : ITP015_4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 6.07/6.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 6.18/6.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 6.18/6.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 6.18/6.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 6.18/6.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 6.18/6.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 6.18/6.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 6.18/6.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 6.18/6.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:00:59 EDT 2024
% 6.18/6.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 58.08/58.83  Running first-order theorem proving
% 58.08/58.83  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lkVoIK8Ecv/E---3.1_22265.p
% 90.57/68.29  # Version: 3.1.0
% 90.57/68.29  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 90.57/68.29  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_3 with 885s (3) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_1 with 885s (3) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting sh5l with 295s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 295s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # new_bool_1 with pid 22921 completed with status 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 90.57/68.29  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 90.57/68.29  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_3 with 885s (3) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_1 with 885s (3) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 90.57/68.29  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 90.57/68.29  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 884 seconds (884 total)
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 478s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_1 with 89s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 80s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 22929 completed with status 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Result found by SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 90.57/68.29  # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 90.57/68.29  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_3 with 885s (3) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_1 with 885s (3) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 90.57/68.29  # Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 90.57/68.29  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 884 seconds (884 total)
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 478s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting new_bool_1 with 89s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 80s (1) cores
% 90.57/68.29  # Preprocessing time       : 0.203 s
% 90.57/68.29  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 90.57/68.29  
% 90.57/68.29  # Proof found!
% 90.57/68.29  # SZS status Theorem
% 90.57/68.29  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 90.57/68.29  # Parsed axioms                        : 53921
% 90.57/68.29  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 51525
% 90.57/68.29  # Initial clauses                      : 5116
% 90.57/68.29  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 917
% 90.57/68.29  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4199
% 90.57/68.29  # Processed clauses                    : 5184
% 90.57/68.29  # ...of these trivial                  : 796
% 90.57/68.29  # ...subsumed                          : 1245
% 90.57/68.29  # ...remaining for further processing  : 3143
% 90.57/68.29  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 276
% 90.57/68.29  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Backward-subsumed                    : 13
% 90.57/68.29  # Backward-rewritten                   : 106
% 90.57/68.29  # Generated clauses                    : 1734
% 90.57/68.29  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1228
% 90.57/68.29  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 13
% 90.57/68.29  # Paramodulations                      : 1463
% 90.57/68.29  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 90.57/68.29  # NegExts                              : 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Equation resolutions                 : 288
% 90.57/68.29  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Total rewrite steps                  : 9234
% 90.57/68.29  # ...of those cached                   : 8023
% 90.57/68.29  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 90.57/68.29  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 90.57/68.29  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 90.57/68.29  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 90.57/68.29  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 90.57/68.29  # Current number of processed clauses  : 336
% 90.57/68.29  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 141
% 90.57/68.29  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 90.57/68.29  #    Negative unit clauses             : 56
% 90.57/68.29  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 134
% 90.57/68.29  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2687
% 90.57/68.29  # ...number of literals in the above   : 9218
% 90.57/68.29  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 90.57/68.29  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2595
% 90.57/68.29  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3305961
% 90.57/68.29  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 290527
% 90.57/68.29  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 810
% 90.57/68.29  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15362
% 90.57/68.29  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 14
% 90.57/68.29  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 5828
% 90.57/68.29  # BW rewrite match successes           : 318
% 90.57/68.29  # Condensation attempts                : 7128
% 90.57/68.29  # Condensation successes               : 59
% 90.57/68.29  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1823770
% 90.57/68.29  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 456485
% 90.57/68.29  
% 90.57/68.29  # -------------------------------------------------
% 90.57/68.29  # User time                : 3.991 s
% 90.57/68.29  # System time              : 0.191 s
% 90.57/68.29  # Total time               : 4.182 s
% 90.57/68.29  # Maximum resident set size: 107708 pages
% 90.57/68.29  
% 90.57/68.29  # -------------------------------------------------
% 90.57/68.29  # User time                : 14.139 s
% 90.57/68.29  # System time              : 0.410 s
% 90.57/68.29  # Total time               : 14.549 s
% 90.57/68.29  # Maximum resident set size: 91416 pages
% 90.57/68.29  % E---3.1 exiting
% 90.57/68.29  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------