TSTP Solution File: ITP012_1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP012_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:08:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   7 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   6   ~;   3   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   5   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  30   !;   0   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint: $tType ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    p: mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool > $o ).

tff(decl_70,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2: ( mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint * mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ) > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_72,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2: ( mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint * mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ) > mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool ).

tff(decl_74,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_76,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2: ( mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint * mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ) > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_96,type,
    esk1_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_97,type,
    esk2_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_98,type,
    esk3_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB,conjecture,
    ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X67: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66))
     => ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X67,X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X67) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.735YDK4TSC/E---3.1_13014.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RADD,axiom,
    ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X67: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66))
     => ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X67,X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X67) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.735YDK4TSC/E---3.1_13014.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RADD) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2Eint__sub,axiom,
    ! [X63: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X64: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X63,X64) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X63,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X64)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.735YDK4TSC/E---3.1_13014.p',thm_2Einteger_2Eint__sub) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG,axiom,
    ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66) )
      & ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X65),X66) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.735YDK4TSC/E---3.1_13014.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG) ).

tff(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X67: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
        ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66))
       => ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X67,X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X67) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB]) ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X81: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X82: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X83: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ~ p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X81,X82))
      | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X81,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X83,X82)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X81,X83) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RADD])])]) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X86: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X87: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X86,X87) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X86,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X87)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2Eint__sub]) ).

tff(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X84: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X85: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X84,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X85)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X84,X85) )
      & ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X84),X85) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X84,X85) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG]) ).

tff(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    & ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X37: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X37,X36)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X37) )
      | ~ p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X36)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X29,X36) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X36)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X36)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X36),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X37: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X36,X37)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X36) )
      | ~ p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X37)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem    : ITP012_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:21:48 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.735YDK4TSC/E---3.1_13014.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # new_bool_3 with pid 13093 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 13096 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48  # Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsed axioms                        : 158
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 143
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses                      : 213
% 0.19/0.48  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 181
% 0.19/0.48  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 32
% 0.19/0.48  # Processed clauses                    : 171
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.19/0.48  # ...subsumed                          : 102
% 0.19/0.48  # ...remaining for further processing  : 68
% 0.19/0.48  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 90
% 0.19/0.48  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Generated clauses                    : 606
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 346
% 0.19/0.48  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Paramodulations                      : 446
% 0.19/0.48  # Factorizations                       : 70
% 0.19/0.48  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Equation resolutions                 : 90
% 0.19/0.48  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Total rewrite steps                  : 117
% 0.19/0.48  # ...of those cached                   : 112
% 0.19/0.48  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.19/0.48  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.19/0.48  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 39
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 222
% 0.19/0.48  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1338
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.19/0.48  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 840
% 0.19/0.48  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 503
% 0.19/0.48  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 101
% 0.19/0.48  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.48  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 12253
% 0.19/0.48  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1775
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 2184 pages
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.19/0.48  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Total time               : 0.024 s
% 0.19/0.48  # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.19/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------