TSTP Solution File: ITP012^4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP012^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:15:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 186.99s 40.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 186.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  205 (  20   ~;  18   |;   7   &; 152   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0   ^  33   !;   0   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint: $tType ).

thf(decl_4721,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > $o ).

thf(decl_4728,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

thf(decl_4732,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

thf(decl_4794,type,
    esk1_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

thf(decl_4795,type,
    esk2_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

thf(decl_4796,type,
    esk3_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

thf(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB,conjecture,
    ! [X24807: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24808: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24809: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24807 @ X24808 )
     => ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24807 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24809 @ X24808 ) )
      <=> ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24807 @ X24809 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB) ).

thf(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__LSUB,axiom,
    ! [X24804: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24805: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24806: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24804 @ X24805 )
     => ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24804 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24805 @ X24806 ) )
      <=> ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24804 @ X24806 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__LSUB) ).

thf(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG,axiom,
    ! [X24802: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24803: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24802 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X24803 ) )
      <=> ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24802 @ X24803 ) )
      & ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X24802 ) @ X24803 )
      <=> ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24802 @ X24803 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG) ).

thf(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__NEG__SUB,axiom,
    ! [X24289: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24290: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24289 @ X24290 ) )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24290 @ X24289 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__NEG__SUB) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X24807: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24808: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24809: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
        ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24807 @ X24808 )
       => ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24807 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24809 @ X24808 ) )
        <=> ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24807 @ X24809 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
    & ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
    & ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
      | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X28071: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X28072: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X28073: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28071 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X28072 @ X28073 ) )
        | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28071 @ X28073 )
        | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28071 @ X28072 ) )
      & ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28071 @ X28073 )
        | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28071 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X28072 @ X28073 ) )
        | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28071 @ X28072 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__LSUB])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X28069: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X28070: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28069 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X28070 ) )
        | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28069 @ X28070 ) )
      & ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28069 @ X28070 )
        | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28069 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X28070 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X28069 ) @ X28070 )
        | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28069 @ X28070 ) )
      & ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X28069 @ X28070 )
        | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X28069 ) @ X28070 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X28088: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X28089: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X28088 @ X28089 ) )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X28089 @ X28088 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__NEG__SUB]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
    | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X24058: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24086: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24088: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24088 @ X24086 ) )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ X24086 )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ X24088 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X24058: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24086: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ X24086 ) )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ X24086 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X24086: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24058: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24058 @ X24086 ) )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24086 @ X24058 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
    | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X24058: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24088: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24086: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24086 @ X24088 ) )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24088 @ X24086 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X24058: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24088: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X24086: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ X24088 )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ X24086 @ X24088 ) )
      | ~ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ X24058 @ X24086 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides @ esk1_0 @ ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_11])]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : ITP012^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 15:58:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 186.99/40.64  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 186.99/40.64  # partial match(2): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 186.99/40.64  # Preprocessing class: HMLLSLLLSSSCHFA.
% 186.99/40.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting new_ho_2 with 1192s (4) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting sh3l with 596s (2) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 298s (1) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting full_lambda_7 with 298s (1) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # lpo5_rw_fix with pid 929 completed with status 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Result found by lpo5_rw_fix
% 186.99/40.64  # partial match(2): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 186.99/40.64  # Preprocessing class: HMLLSLLLSSSCHFA.
% 186.99/40.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting new_ho_2 with 1192s (4) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting sh3l with 596s (2) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 298s (1) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 186.99/40.64  # Search class: HGHSM-SMLM33-DHFFFSBC
% 186.99/40.64  # partial match(1): HGHSM-SMLM33-MHFFFSBC
% 186.99/40.64  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting new_ho_10 with 161s (1) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # new_ho_10 with pid 933 completed with status 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 186.99/40.64  # partial match(2): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 186.99/40.64  # Preprocessing class: HMLLSLLLSSSCHFA.
% 186.99/40.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting new_ho_2 with 1192s (4) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting sh3l with 596s (2) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 298s (1) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 186.99/40.64  # Search class: HGHSM-SMLM33-DHFFFSBC
% 186.99/40.64  # partial match(1): HGHSM-SMLM33-MHFFFSBC
% 186.99/40.64  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 297 seconds (297 total)
% 186.99/40.64  # Starting new_ho_10 with 161s (1) cores
% 186.99/40.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.238 s
% 186.99/40.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 186.99/40.64  
% 186.99/40.64  # Proof found!
% 186.99/40.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 186.99/40.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 186.99/40.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 33100
% 186.99/40.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 32099
% 186.99/40.64  # Initial clauses                      : 3945
% 186.99/40.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1013
% 186.99/40.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2932
% 186.99/40.64  # Processed clauses                    : 6706
% 186.99/40.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 469
% 186.99/40.64  # ...subsumed                          : 1598
% 186.99/40.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4639
% 186.99/40.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 497
% 186.99/40.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 53
% 186.99/40.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 61
% 186.99/40.64  # Generated clauses                    : 125384
% 186.99/40.64  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 120025
% 186.99/40.64  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 24
% 186.99/40.64  # Paramodulations                      : 124646
% 186.99/40.64  # Factorizations                       : 20
% 186.99/40.64  # NegExts                              : 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 640
% 186.99/40.64  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Total rewrite steps                  : 26061
% 186.99/40.64  # ...of those cached                   : 21808
% 186.99/40.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 186.99/40.64  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 186.99/40.64  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 186.99/40.64  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 186.99/40.64  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 186.99/40.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2379
% 186.99/40.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 268
% 186.99/40.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 186.99/40.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 157
% 186.99/40.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1945
% 186.99/40.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 118050
% 186.99/40.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 697058
% 186.99/40.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 186.99/40.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2118
% 186.99/40.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10624301
% 186.99/40.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 613620
% 186.99/40.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 799
% 186.99/40.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 98403
% 186.99/40.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 186.99/40.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2462
% 186.99/40.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 225
% 186.99/40.64  # Condensation attempts                : 6706
% 186.99/40.64  # Condensation successes               : 157
% 186.99/40.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 37423969
% 186.99/40.64  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 332739
% 186.99/40.64  
% 186.99/40.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 186.99/40.64  # User time                : 36.462 s
% 186.99/40.64  # System time              : 0.349 s
% 186.99/40.64  # Total time               : 36.811 s
% 186.99/40.64  # Maximum resident set size: 74768 pages
% 186.99/40.64  
% 186.99/40.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 186.99/40.64  # User time                : 39.270 s
% 186.99/40.64  # System time              : 0.428 s
% 186.99/40.64  # Total time               : 39.698 s
% 186.99/40.64  # Maximum resident set size: 63120 pages
% 186.99/40.64  % E---3.1 exiting
% 186.99/40.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------