TSTP Solution File: ITP010_5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ITP010_5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:06:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 11.46s 10.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 5 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 2 sgn 8 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
del: $tType ).
tff(decl_22,type,
bool: del ).
tff(decl_24,type,
arr: ( del * del ) > del ).
tff(decl_25,type,
mem: ( $i * del ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
ap: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
p: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_3036,type,
c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq: ( del * del ) > $i ).
tff(conj_thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE,conjecture,
! [X11: del,X14: del,X324] :
( mem(X324,arr(X11,bool))
=> ! [X55] :
( mem(X55,arr(X14,bool))
=> ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(X11,X14),X324),X55))
<=> ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(X11,X14),X324),X55)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UVoRCejsgw/E---3.1_7866.p',conj_thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE) ).
tff(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X11: del,X14: del,X324] :
( mem(X324,arr(X11,bool))
=> ! [X55] : $true ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE])]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 3.02/3.09 % Problem : ITP010_5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 3.06/3.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 3.06/3.31 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 3.06/3.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 3.06/3.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 3.06/3.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 3.06/3.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 3.06/3.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 3.06/3.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 3.06/3.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:04:01 EDT 2024
% 3.06/3.31 % CPUTime :
% 8.81/9.04 Running first-order theorem proving
% 8.81/9.04 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UVoRCejsgw/E---3.1_7866.p
% 11.46/10.92 # Version: 3.1.0
% 11.46/10.92 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 11.46/10.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 7947 completed with status 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 11.46/10.92 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 11.46/10.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_R02_F100_L20000
% 11.46/10.92 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.46/10.92 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.46/10.92 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 162s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 7948 completed with status 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 11.46/10.92 # Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 11.46/10.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 299 seconds (2392 total)
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 897s (3) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 897s (3) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting sh5l with 299s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 299s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_R02_F100_L20000
% 11.46/10.92 # Search class: FGHSM-SMLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.46/10.92 # partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 11.46/10.92 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 11.46/10.92 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 162s (1) cores
% 11.46/10.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.045 s
% 11.46/10.92 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.46/10.92
% 11.46/10.92 # Proof found!
% 11.46/10.92 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.46/10.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.46/10.92 # Parsed axioms : 11903
% 11.46/10.92 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11587
% 11.46/10.92 # Initial clauses : 1179
% 11.46/10.92 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 32
% 11.46/10.92 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1147
% 11.46/10.92 # Processed clauses : 1
% 11.46/10.92 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # ...subsumed : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Generated clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Paramodulations : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Factorizations : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # NegExts : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # ...of those cached : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional check models : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 11.46/10.92 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 11.46/10.92 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 11.46/10.92 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 11.46/10.92 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 11.46/10.92 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1146
% 11.46/10.92 # ...number of literals in the above : 5913
% 11.46/10.92 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Condensation successes : 0
% 11.46/10.92 # Termbank termtop insertions : 517596
% 11.46/10.92 # Search garbage collected termcells : 247128
% 11.46/10.92
% 11.46/10.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.46/10.92 # User time : 0.278 s
% 11.46/10.92 # System time : 0.051 s
% 11.46/10.92 # Total time : 0.329 s
% 11.46/10.92 # Maximum resident set size: 47080 pages
% 11.46/10.92
% 11.46/10.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.46/10.92 # User time : 1.760 s
% 11.46/10.92 # System time : 0.094 s
% 11.46/10.92 # Total time : 1.854 s
% 11.46/10.92 # Maximum resident set size: 40052 pages
% 11.46/10.92 % E---3.1 exiting
% 11.74/10.92 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------