TSTP Solution File: ITP010+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : ITP010+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:43:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.24s 1.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   3 unt;  25 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    9 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   23 (  13   >;  10   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   22 (  22 usr;  12 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (;   4   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ mem > p > ne > k > c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq > arr > ap > #nlpp > i > c_2Emin_2E_3D > c_2Ebool_2E_21 > ind > c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E > c_2Ebool_2E_7E > c_2Ebool_2E_5C_2F > c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C > c_2Ebool_2ET > c_2Ebool_2EF > bool > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_4 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq,type,
    c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(arr,type,
    arr: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(ne,type,
    ne: $i > $o ).

tff(c_2Ebool_2EF,type,
    c_2Ebool_2EF: $i ).

tff(i,type,
    i: $i > $i ).

tff(c_2Ebool_2E_21,type,
    c_2Ebool_2E_21: $i > $i ).

tff(bool,type,
    bool: $i ).

tff(mem,type,
    mem: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(ap,type,
    ap: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i > $o ).

tff(ind,type,
    ind: $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E,type,
    c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E: $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff(c_2Ebool_2E_5C_2F,type,
    c_2Ebool_2E_5C_2F: $i ).

tff(c_2Ebool_2E_7E,type,
    c_2Ebool_2E_7E: $i ).

tff(c_2Ebool_2ET,type,
    c_2Ebool_2ET: $i ).

tff(k,type,
    k: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c_2Emin_2E_3D,type,
    c_2Emin_2E_3D: $i > $i ).

tff(c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C,type,
    c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C: $i ).

tff(f_438,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A_27a] :
        ( ne(A_27a)
       => ! [A_27b] :
            ( ne(A_27b)
           => ! [V0s] :
                ( mem(V0s,arr(A_27a,bool))
               => ! [V1t] :
                    ( mem(V1t,arr(A_27b,bool))
                   => ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t))
                    <=> ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t)) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE) ).

tff(c_1247,plain,
    ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq('#skF_4','#skF_5'),'#skF_6'),'#skF_7')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_438]) ).

tff(c_1245,plain,
    p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq('#skF_4','#skF_5'),'#skF_6'),'#skF_7')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_438]) ).

tff(c_1256,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1247,c_1245]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : ITP010+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:07:01 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.24/1.97  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.24/1.98  
% 4.24/1.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.24/2.01  
% 4.24/2.01  Inference rules
% 4.24/2.01  ----------------------
% 4.24/2.01  #Ref     : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Sup     : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Fact    : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Define  : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Split   : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Chain   : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Close   : 0
% 4.24/2.01  
% 4.24/2.01  Ordering : KBO
% 4.24/2.01  
% 4.24/2.01  Simplification rules
% 4.24/2.01  ----------------------
% 4.24/2.01  #Subsume      : 44
% 4.24/2.01  #Demod        : 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Tautology    : 582
% 4.24/2.01  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 4.24/2.01  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.24/2.01  
% 4.24/2.01  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.24/2.01  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.24/2.01  
% 4.24/2.01  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.24/2.01  ----------------------
% 4.24/2.02  Preprocessing        : 0.85
% 4.37/2.02  Parsing              : 0.26
% 4.37/2.02  CNF conversion       : 0.10
% 4.37/2.02  Main loop            : 0.06
% 4.37/2.02  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 4.37/2.02  Reduction            : 0.03
% 4.37/2.02  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 4.37/2.02  BG Simplification    : 0.12
% 4.37/2.02  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 4.37/2.02  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.37/2.02  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.37/2.02  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.37/2.02  Total                : 0.96
% 4.37/2.02  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.37/2.02  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.37/2.02  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.37/2.02  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------