TSTP Solution File: ITP010+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : ITP010+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:35:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : ITP010+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 23:17:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Fri Jun 3 23:17:40 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6996.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EF_2E0))|p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,A)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EF_2E0))|p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,A))| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EF_2E0)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 3 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0))| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EF_2E0)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,A))|s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)=s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C))| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B))|s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)=s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C))|s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)!=s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B))|s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)!=s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)| -p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),B),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(C,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),D)))=s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(C,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),app_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(C,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool)),c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(A,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),B))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(C,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),D))).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,3] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B))|s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,B)=s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)|p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,C)).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.00 sec ----> 69 [] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 Length of proof is -1. Level of proof is -1.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 69 [] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.37 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 Process 6996 finished Fri Jun 3 23:17:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------