TSTP Solution File: ITP005+5 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP005+5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:06:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.63s 2.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  21   ~;  16   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__inv,conjecture,
    ! [X9] :
      ( ne(X9)
     => ! [X11] :
          ( ne(X11)
         => ! [X178] :
              ( mem(X178,arr(X9,arr(X11,bool)))
             => ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(X9,X11),ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(X9,X11),X178)) = X178 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTBSMSUTaE/E---3.1_6567.p',conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__inv) ).

fof(conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__IS__UNCURRY,axiom,
    ! [X9] :
      ( ne(X9)
     => ! [X11] :
          ( ne(X11)
         => c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(X9,X11) = c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(X9,X11,bool) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTBSMSUTaE/E---3.1_6567.p',conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__IS__UNCURRY) ).

fof(conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel__IS__CURRY,axiom,
    ! [X9] :
      ( ne(X9)
     => ! [X11] :
          ( ne(X11)
         => c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(X9,X11) = c_2Epair_2ECURRY(X9,X11,bool) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTBSMSUTaE/E---3.1_6567.p',conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel__IS__CURRY) ).

fof(conj_thm_2Epair_2ECURRY__UNCURRY__THM,axiom,
    ! [X9] :
      ( ne(X9)
     => ! [X11] :
          ( ne(X11)
         => ! [X59] :
              ( ne(X59)
             => ! [X19] :
                  ( mem(X19,arr(X9,arr(X11,X59)))
                 => ap(c_2Epair_2ECURRY(X9,X11,X59),ap(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(X9,X11,X59),X19)) = X19 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTBSMSUTaE/E---3.1_6567.p',conj_thm_2Epair_2ECURRY__UNCURRY__THM) ).

fof(bool_ne,axiom,
    ne(bool),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTBSMSUTaE/E---3.1_6567.p',bool_ne) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X9] :
        ( ne(X9)
       => ! [X11] :
            ( ne(X11)
           => ! [X178] :
                ( mem(X178,arr(X9,arr(X11,bool)))
               => ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(X9,X11),ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(X9,X11),X178)) = X178 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__inv]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ne(esk1_0)
    & ne(esk2_0)
    & mem(esk3_0,arr(esk1_0,arr(esk2_0,bool)))
    & ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(esk1_0,esk2_0),ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)) != esk3_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X559,X560] :
      ( ~ ne(X559)
      | ~ ne(X560)
      | c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(X559,X560) = c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(X559,X560,bool) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__IS__UNCURRY])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(esk1_0,esk2_0),ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)) != esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln(X1,X2) = c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(X1,X2,bool)
    | ~ ne(X1)
    | ~ ne(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ne(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ne(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X568,X569] :
      ( ~ ne(X568)
      | ~ ne(X569)
      | c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(X568,X569) = c_2Epair_2ECURRY(X568,X569,bool) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel__IS__CURRY])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ap(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(esk1_0,esk2_0),ap(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(esk1_0,esk2_0,bool),esk3_0)) != esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel(X1,X2) = c_2Epair_2ECURRY(X1,X2,bool)
    | ~ ne(X1)
    | ~ ne(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1272,X1273,X1274,X1275] :
      ( ~ ne(X1272)
      | ~ ne(X1273)
      | ~ ne(X1274)
      | ~ mem(X1275,arr(X1272,arr(X1273,X1274)))
      | ap(c_2Epair_2ECURRY(X1272,X1273,X1274),ap(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(X1272,X1273,X1274),X1275)) = X1275 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Epair_2ECURRY__UNCURRY__THM])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ap(c_2Epair_2ECURRY(esk1_0,esk2_0,bool),ap(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(esk1_0,esk2_0,bool),esk3_0)) != esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ap(c_2Epair_2ECURRY(X1,X2,X3),ap(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY(X1,X2,X3),X4)) = X4
    | ~ ne(X1)
    | ~ ne(X2)
    | ~ ne(X3)
    | ~ mem(X4,arr(X1,arr(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    mem(esk3_0,arr(esk1_0,arr(esk2_0,bool))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ne(bool),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[bool_ne]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.47  % Problem    : ITP005+5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.47/0.48  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.51/0.69  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.51/0.69  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.51/0.69  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.51/0.69  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.51/0.69  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.51/0.69  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.51/0.69  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.51/0.69  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 12:03:06 EDT 2024
% 0.51/0.69  % CPUTime    : 
% 1.13/1.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 1.13/1.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.DTBSMSUTaE/E---3.1_6567.p
% 5.63/2.11  # Version: 3.1.0
% 5.63/2.11  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.63/2.11  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # new_bool_3 with pid 6645 completed with status 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 5.63/2.11  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.63/2.11  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.63/2.11  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.63/2.11  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 541s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 91s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 6653 completed with status 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 5.63/2.11  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 5.63/2.11  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.63/2.11  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 5.63/2.11  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 541s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 5.63/2.11  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 5.63/2.11  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.63/2.11  
% 5.63/2.11  # Proof found!
% 5.63/2.11  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.63/2.11  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.63/2.11  # Parsed axioms                        : 3163
% 5.63/2.11  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2859
% 5.63/2.11  # Initial clauses                      : 1541
% 5.63/2.11  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 916
% 5.63/2.11  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 625
% 5.63/2.11  # Processed clauses                    : 2041
% 5.63/2.11  # ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 5.63/2.11  # ...subsumed                          : 536
% 5.63/2.11  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1499
% 5.63/2.11  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 40
% 5.63/2.11  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Backward-subsumed                    : 123
% 5.63/2.11  # Backward-rewritten                   : 34
% 5.63/2.11  # Generated clauses                    : 29270
% 5.63/2.11  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28941
% 5.63/2.11  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 33
% 5.63/2.11  # Paramodulations                      : 29214
% 5.63/2.11  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 5.63/2.11  # NegExts                              : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Equation resolutions                 : 46
% 5.63/2.11  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Total rewrite steps                  : 9745
% 5.63/2.11  # ...of those cached                   : 9735
% 5.63/2.11  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.63/2.11  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.63/2.11  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.63/2.11  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.63/2.11  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.63/2.11  # Current number of processed clauses  : 742
% 5.63/2.11  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 5.63/2.11  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.63/2.11  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 5.63/2.11  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 726
% 5.63/2.11  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27435
% 5.63/2.11  # ...number of literals in the above   : 176344
% 5.63/2.11  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Current number of archived clauses   : 718
% 5.63/2.11  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 126248
% 5.63/2.11  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8830
% 5.63/2.11  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 574
% 5.63/2.11  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 432
% 5.63/2.11  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 5.63/2.11  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 5.63/2.11  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.63/2.11  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1039945
% 5.63/2.11  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 69686
% 5.63/2.11  
% 5.63/2.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.63/2.11  # User time                : 0.642 s
% 5.63/2.11  # System time              : 0.033 s
% 5.63/2.11  # Total time               : 0.675 s
% 5.63/2.11  # Maximum resident set size: 12536 pages
% 5.63/2.11  
% 5.63/2.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.63/2.11  # User time                : 1.804 s
% 5.63/2.11  # System time              : 0.066 s
% 5.63/2.11  # Total time               : 1.871 s
% 5.63/2.11  # Maximum resident set size: 8368 pages
% 5.63/2.11  % E---3.1 exiting
% 5.63/2.11  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------