TSTP Solution File: ITP001+4 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : ITP001+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:20:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   7 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   0 usr;   3 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_5,type,
    sQ43_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_6,type,
    sQ44_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_7,type,
    sQ45_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).

fof(f886,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_instgen_refutation,[],[f410,f389]) ).

fof(f389,plain,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reserved_2Eho_2Etruth) ).

fof(f410,plain,
    ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f153]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    inference(flattening,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f88,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f87,conjecture,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.06  % Problem    : ITP001+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.02/0.07  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 23:20:46 EDT 2022
% 0.06/0.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.34  % (26320)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.10/0.34  % (26323)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.10/0.37  % (26315)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.10/0.38  % (26312)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.10/0.38  % (26321)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.10/0.38  % (26332)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26310)ott+10_1:32_abs=on:br=off:urr=ec_only:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26314)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26323)First to succeed.
% 0.10/0.39  % (26322)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26309)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26313)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26324)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.10/0.39  % (26328)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.10/0.40  % (26331)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.10/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)------------------------------
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Memory used [KB]: 6396
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)Instructions burned: 19 (million)
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)------------------------------
% 0.10/0.40  % (26323)------------------------------
% 0.10/0.40  % (26303)Success in time 0.138 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------