%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : ITP001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:33:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.75s 2.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d_y3uogc/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-d_y3uogc/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2ET_2E0)),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem  : ITP001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.08/0.09  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 21:55:02 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 5.75/2.11  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 5.75/2.11  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.75/2.11  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.75/2.11  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.75/2.11  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.75/2.11  #
% 5.75/2.11  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 5.75/2.11  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.75/2.11  
% 5.75/2.11  # Proof found!
% 5.75/2.11  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.75/2.11  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.75/2.11  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.75/2.11  
% 5.75/2.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.75/2.11  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 5.75/2.11  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 5.75/2.11  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 5.75/2.11  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 5.75/2.11  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------