TSTP Solution File: ITP001^4 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : ITP001^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:15:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 8 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 1 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 ^ 2 !; 0 ?; 2 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_50,type,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET: $o ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH,conjecture,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF,axiom,
( mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET
<=> ! [X42: $o] :
( X42
<=> X42 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
( mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET
<=> ! [X42: $o] : $true ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ITP001^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat May 18 17:26:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSLSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # full_lambda_9 with pid 32738 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by full_lambda_9
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSLSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HGHSM-FFLM31-DHFFFFBN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FFLM31-DSFFFFBN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best5 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # ehoh_best5 with pid 32739 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by ehoh_best5
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSLSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HGHSM-FFLM31-DHFFFFBN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(1): HGHSM-FFLM31-DSFFFFBN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best5 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 218
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 164
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 137
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 30
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 107
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 105
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 264
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 21238
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2810
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 2500 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1976 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------